Baseball Rejects Cable Offer to Match DirecTV Deal

Search

And if the Road Warrior says it, it must be true..
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,481
Tokens
Baseball Rejects Cable Offer to Match DirecTV Deal (Update2)

By Erik Matuszewski
March 21 (Bloomberg) -- Major League Baseball rejected a bid by cable-television companies to retain a premium package of games, saying the offer doesn't meet demands set by the league.
The proposal by cable companies ``falls short of nearly all the material conditions,'' the league said today in a statement. Baseball said cable companies and EchoStar Communications Corp.'s Dish Network may still match a deal the league struck with satellite-TV operator DirecTV Group Inc.
The dispute threatens to cut off out-of-market baseball games, called the Extra Innings package, to as many as 75 million cable households. The league said the cable industry failed to meet demands related to carrying a new baseball channel that starts in 2009 and fee-sharing.
``We, like many, many others, question MLB's commitment to its fans by limiting distribution of both Extra Innings and the Baseball Channel,'' said Robert Jacobson, president of In Demand Networks, a programming group owned by cable operators including the two largest, Comcast Corp. and Time Warner Cable Inc.
The cable companies were given until the end of the month to match the terms of a March 8 agreement between baseball and DirecTV, which gave the nation's biggest satellite operator the right to broadcast out-of-market games for seven years.
DirecTV also received a stake in the Baseball Channel. Under pressure from lawmakers, Major League Baseball gave up an attempt to make the DirecTV deal exclusive.
Strike Out?
Extra Innings features 60 games a week. If the rival services are unable to reach a deal with baseball, fans would have to subscribe to DirecTV to continue receiving the games. DirecTV has almost 16 million subscribers.
``By rejecting this matching offer, MLB has proven it never intended for In Demand to have a fair and equal opportunity to bid for Extra Innings,'' Jacobson said in a statement. The cable proposal ``was fully responsive'' to the league, he said.
Tim Brosnan, baseball's executive vice president of business, said In Demand wasn't willing to offer the Baseball Channel to enough homes or share fees along the lines sought by the league.
``We made them an offer that wasn't open to negotiation,'' Brosnan said in a telephone interview. ``They didn't match on anything.''
Seven-Year Deal
Shares of El Segundo, California-based DirecTV rose $1.13, or 5 percent, to $23.75 at 4:01 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Time Warner Cable, based in Stamford, Connecticut, fell 4 cents to $38.26. Philadelphia-based Comcast climbed 57 cents to $26.85 on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
The cable companies are seeking a seven-year commitment for the Extra Innings package and the MLB Channel. In Demand said the companies would agree to distribute the Baseball Channel to at least as many subscribers as DirecTV has when the channel goes on the air.
The cable companies' offer didn't discuss ownership of the Baseball Channel. FCC rules bar cable companies from demanding an ownership stake in a network as a condition of carriage.
``We have offered to carry The Baseball Channel to the same number of subscribers as Direct TV and have offered the same compensation to MLB as DirecTV,'' Jacobson said.
DirecTV spokesman Robert Mercer declined to comment.
To contact the reporter on this story: Erik Matuszewski in New York at matuszewski@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: March 21, 2007 18:04 EDT
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
What a bunch of greedy fucks. Dont they realize that this is only going to hurt in the long run?
 

And if the Road Warrior says it, it must be true..
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,481
Tokens
MLB, IN Demand Vague About Rights Dispute

John Consoli

MARCH 21, 2007 -

Major League Baseball president and COO Bob DuPuy said today that IN Demand’s offer to match DirecTV’s $700 million, seven-year carriage rights deal, is “not responsive” to the terms set forth by MLB to allow it to match, adding that the offer “fails short of all the material conditions.”

But IN Demand president Robert Jacobson disagreed, stating, “Our offer was fully responsive to Major League Baseball’s requirements and public statements.”

Both sides were vague as to what the points within the deal were matched or not matched specifically, but sources familiar with the situation said that while In Demand offered to match the dollar amount to carry the MLB Extra Innings package of out-of-market games and to launch the MLB Channel, the disagreement is over how the MLB Channel will be carried or distributed.

Through the deal with DirecTV, MLB Channel will be offered on Total Choice, its basic tier. Total Choice on DirecTV reaches over 15 million households in the U.S., and In Demand offered to carry MLB Channel in a similar amount of homes, but all those households would not necessarily be on basic tiers.

In Demand is a partnership between cable operators Time Warner, Comcast and Cox.

“By rejecting the matching offer, MLB has proven it never intended for In Demand to have a fair and equal opportunity to bid for Extra Innings,” Jacobson said in a statement. But a MLB source said, “IN Demand’s offer had to be identical to the terms of the DirecTV deal and it wasn’t.”

The disagreement took place on the same day that MLB sent a 10-page letter to the Federal Communications Commission, providing it with information about its deal with DirecTV, which had been requested by the FCC.

The letter, from DuPuy, states, “We remain hopeful that EchoStar and IN Demand will capitalize on the opportunity” to match the DirecTV deal. DuPuy adds that if those two parties do not make matching offers, “our agreement with DirecTV is fully consistent with the policies adopted by both Congress and the Commission.”

The letter says the while MLB is being taken to task for doing a possible exclusive deal with DirecTV for the Extra Innings package should no one else match, cable operators have done this for sports programming in the past and “Congress has not taken any action to prohibit such contracts.”

The letter cites Comcast doing exclusive cable-only deals for Comcast SportsNet in Philadelphia, which carries Philadelphia Flyers and Philadelphia 76ers games, both owned by Comcast.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
Phillies games are not part of the package either, unless you get the other team's feed. I actually agree with Directv here. They negiotiated a price for exclusive rights. Why should another company think they can come in and match it?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,303
Tokens
Phillies games are not part of the package either, unless you get the other team's feed. I actually agree with Directv here. They negiotiated a price for exclusive rights. Why should another company think they can come in and match it?

Who cares about DTV, the fans are the most important part of the product. Without fans, there is no league. Cutting off the majority of your fans for more money is not just classless but horrible business sense.

Deals like these should not be allowed.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
Who cares about DTV, the fans are the most important part of the product. Without fans, there is no league. Cutting off the majority of your fans for more money is not just classless but horrible business sense.

Deals like these should not be allowed.

Why is this deal any different than the NFL Sunday Ticket? The people of Wisconsin knows Bud Selig would sell anything for money - look at Miller Park.

Pisses me off more knowing you cannot get the Phillies, Padres, or Blue Jays games. Also the Fox network out-of-market games should be included too.
 

And if the Road Warrior says it, it must be true..
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,481
Tokens
Who cares about DTV, the fans are the most important part of the product. Without fans, there is no league. Cutting off the majority of your fans for more money is not just classless but horrible business sense.

Deals like these should not be allowed.

IMO Directv will do to baseball what it did for NFL. They are going to create a channel that has all the scores, another channel w/ lookins on games that just scored or about to score. The fan IMO will benifit from this agreement.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,447
Tokens
IMO Directv will do to baseball what it did for NFL. They are going to create a channel that has all the scores, another channel w/ lookins on games that just scored or about to score. The fan IMO will benifit from this agreement.

Yeah, because there is no way they could have done that with cable:ohno:
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
IMO Directv will do to baseball what it did for NFL. They are going to create a channel that has all the scores, another channel w/ lookins on games that just scored or about to score. The fan IMO will benifit from this agreement.

Yeah, because every baseball fan has Directv
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,474
Messages
13,451,852
Members
99,417
Latest member
go789click
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com