MLB: Friday April 6th Plays

Search

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
I will more than likely add one or two come tomorrow if the lines drop a bit.


Mariners @ Indians
Play: Mariners +130
Intrinsic Value: -103
Consider Betting: +112
Comment:

No, I don’t expect the books to open the Mariners as the favorite in this game, but I do feel they have just as good chance (slightly better) of winning in this spot. Byrd showed enough evidence last year that he is essentially done being an effective pitcher on the mound, and those quietly solid numbers he was generating in years prior will be really hard to obtain now that he is 36. He no longer can hide his inability to pitcher to left handed batters and was owned by them last year. He is also one of those rare pitchers that always put up better numbers on the road, no matter what team he pitched for. Part of the value potentially derived on the Mariners might be influenced by his solid career numbers against the team. However, all those numbers were generated while he was an effective pitcher, and in his only start against them last year, he last just three innings before getting taken out. Both these teams have actually been more productive on a three year weighted average hitting on the road as well (partially derived by the pitchers park in Seattle). Add that to Byrd never pitching effectively at home, and home field advantage is inflated in this spot. The Indians just got finished playing a hard fought series against the White Sox on Thursday where they had to use a lot of bullpen pitchers. Byrd has never been a solid innings eater, something that should hold especially true with his first start.

Ramirez has yet to pitch to his potential, but being traded for Soriano shows what the Mariners think about him. He has three solid pitches that has made him effective against left handed bats, which is a huge asset going up against a team whose three starting outfielders bat from the left side, while both Hafner and Martinez do so as well. He seems to be harder to pick up under the nights with the notable disparity of numbers, and is backed by a deeper and better rested bullpen than his opponents.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Twins @ White Sox
Play: White Sox -120
Intrinsic Value: -170
Consider Betting Price: -156
Comment:

Prior to seasons start, I was expecting for the White Sox to be an intriguing go- against, as I have been waiting for their inevitable regression from their World Series title. However, it appears that so are the linesmakers, as they have put a line out for them for the third straight game in which I deem below their intrinsic value. A couple of years ago I was expecting Silva to be a nice complementary right hander for Santana for many years to come. Last years disaster blamed by the WBC and inability to locate his sinker has left a lot to be desired. However, prior to last year, he was still very hittable and relied on his sinker (that has depreciated in value) to get him out of a lot of jams. He comes into this season with an OBA over .300. Silva also is much more effective inside his dome, and even when pitching well, was never effective as a road starter. He has also been known to start seasons slow, coming into today’s game with a career April ERA of nearly five. He was extremely vulnerable to the long ball last year once his sinker become ineffective, which is a disaster when pitching in this park. If there is one team that has his number, it is the White Sox, as his near six career ERA against them will reflect. Not suprisngly, Cellular Field has eaten him alive, allowing over seven runs per nine and a home run less than every three innings. Also night a surprise is the amount of players on the White Sox with past success against him, including new addition Erstad. Silva is backed by the best bullpen, but most of its strength is in the backend defending a lead. Pulling the trigger early on Silva might be hard with Ponson on the mound the following day.

The Twins lineup is improved, but is nothing to write home about outside their dome. Vazquez’s low career WHIP shows there is upside off his high ERA. He did a good job limiting the home runs allowed in this park, and his struggles against the Twins last year came in the dome. He is a right hander that is more effective against left handed hitters, which works in his favor, as the Twins two best bats are from the left side. His bullpen is suspect and has seen a lot of work, but their pitcher throwing better than any, Aardsma had the day off yesterday.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Blue Jays @ Devil Rays
Play: Devil Rays +126
Intrinsic Value – 102
Consider Betting Price: +112


The Devil Rays should Thursday against the Yankees that they have a lot of fight in them and should not be taken lightly. The Devil Rays have shown the last few years that they are much better when defending their home park, and seem to play with an increased energy level. Their lineup is young and underrated, and have a second straight game in which they are primed to do some damage against the opponents starting pitcher. Albeit, Chacin was plagued by injuries last year, but even during his solid rookie season, he supported a dangerous whip, something he has done all throughout the minors as well. His spring was not impressive either. His wind up makes him hard on left handers, but will not be seeing many against the Rays. Home runs allowed and high walk total is becoming an increasing concern, two things you don’t want in this park. The Rays have a better chance of using their speed against him this time around as well without Molina as their catcher. The Devil Rays bats are simply underrated.

You can add Shields to the underrated list as well. His high ERA last year might scare away the public, but not me. His solid K/BB ratio last year was foretelling of his potential, and having a solid sinker and groundball ratio should curtail his propensity to allow the long ball. He pitched well in spring. He was much better at home last year, and handled the Blue Jays bats at ease in his only start against them last year. The Blue Jays have a dangerous lineup, but might have the highest disparity of productivity of home vs. away if the recent past is any indicator. The Devil Rays bullpen is scary bad, but it is not too often that that problem is not reflected in the line.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Dodgers @ Giants
Play: Giants -104
Intrinsic Value: -122
Consider Betting Price: -110
Comment:

Two years ago I was really high on the southpaw Lowry. Despite last year, my expectations of him being a very solid pitcher has not changed whatsoever. Lowry was plagued by two injuries throughout last season that really hindered his pitching ability, inflated his numbers, and has now created value on him coming into this year. His changeup is as good as it gets for a southpaw, and his increasing velocity to his fastball makes it that much more effective. He has established a comfort level on his home mound, pitching much more effective here, and has been harder to pick up during night games. If one team knows Lowry’s potential, it is the Dodgers, who he dominated when healthy, and pitched better against them than his numbers last year(bullpen allowed a lot of his runs). Backed by a sub par bullpen, but a bullpen that can pitch the Dodgers well. The Dodgers lineup is old, and not as effective away from home, despite playing in a hitters park.

You never know what you are going to get with Penny, but another late season collapse on his part makes me think his name and reputation exceeds his worth. The bottom of the line is that he comes into the season with a not terribly impressive career WHIP and ERA, and those numbers are actually a concern on the road. Despite being a pitchers park, Penny has never had success in SF.
 

Uno

Ban Teddy
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
7,057
Tokens
Love the Sox, Drays and Mariners man.

Good luck.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
2,425
Tokens
really glad you are on the drays. loved seeing that line this morning. i really like shields. was hoping for more value on the pirates. what do you think about the tigers and padres?
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
I'm also glad to see you like the D-Rays as that was one of the games that stuck out to me. I also feel like St. Louis is in a very good spot and at -110 for what I see as a bit of a pitching mismatch, I think it's got some value. Would love to hear your thoughts on that one if you get a chance. Thanks for the plays and BOL.
 

Hang em and Bang Em
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
1,186
Tokens
Good luck buffet like the White Sox...Silva cant get major league hitters out anymore.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
1,752
Tokens
Buffett - SUPER analysis, hell I can almost see the game as you describe the details. This type of post/analysis is my favorite, as I have close to a photographic memory when it comes to remembering sports stats/leans/adv's, etc, as I see them a a picture, or a picture of the text, then I remember it.

Your posts, with detailed information sticks in my mind more than say, pick the Twins today. Better is "comes into game with acareer April ERA of nearly five", that works for me.

I have a question, if you find any time to answer (greatly appreciated)

I am more than intrigued with your 'intrinsic valuation' you apply to your picks.
I've dalied with the ROI calculators, followed line movement, and tried to justify the best dogs using those methods.

Can you shed some light, or maybe point me in the direction of a few of the elements you use to determine the 'intrinsic value' number you apply to your picks? Is there a combination you crunch to get to that number?

I know I'm asking a lot here, but any tips, help would be greatly appreciated. I use a completely different technique for college baskets and NFL, but baseball is more complicated than just being able to slap formulaic grids to determine an outcome.

Any help would be greatly appreciated (and, no, not asking for trade secrets, only some guidance).

Two great books, since you like Stats and seem to understand that world:

"Theory of Games and Economic Behavior", John Von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern", Princeton Press, 1990 (sixth printing).

"The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic" revised edition, by Richard A Epstein, Academic Press, 1977. The entire book is great, especially the chapter on Decision Making and Utility.

Anyway, thought you might like to check 'em out.

I'm on your picks today. Any help with the 'instrinsic value' question I have would be deeply appreciated (if you have any spare time.)

Uncle Steve in TexLand
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Thanks guys.

Steve,
I made a post prior to season's start sharing my valuation process. Here is the link. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=470681



Finamn,
I didn’t derive an intrinsic value on the Pirates game. Both have young pitchers going on the mound whose worth should have little to do with last years performances. I want to see a couple of starts from them before valuing them. Betting on that game involves a lot of speculation, and quantifying a line would be accompanied with a soft valuation.

I didn’t handicap the Padres game either, as Hirsh is a pitcher that I must see first. On the surface, I see no value on the Padres.

I am really surprised to see the Tigers undervalued a bit against a Royals team, but in my opinion, they are a bit in this game. I value them at -171, and would enter a position at
-151. But I doubt it will drop to where I feel they warrant a play. But the time to bet on Verlander is early when he is fresh.

Jibba,
When I derived a line for the Cardinals game before the lines came out yesterday, I was expecting them to be a play. I valued them at -108, and thought they might be a dog on the road. But it is not the case. The big pitching disparity that we agree upon was fully factored into the opening line, and line movement has made the Cardinals a bit overvalued. With the way they are playing, they don’t warrant laying odds on the road. I would bet them at +107, something that they won’t get near in this game. But I am fine with that, as they are not that good of a team.

I am adding another play soon, and will be back with a write up.

Good luck.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
As always, thanks for your willingness to come back and answer a few questions for those of us trying to learn.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
1,752
Tokens
Thanks guys.

Steve,
I made a post prior to season's start sharing my valuation process. Here is the link. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=470681



Finamn,
I didn’t derive an intrinsic value on the Pirates game. Both have young pitchers going on the mound whose worth should have little to do with last years performances. I want to see a couple of starts from them before valuing them. Betting on that game involves a lot of speculation, and quantifying a line would be accompanied with a soft valuation.

I didn’t handicap the Padres game either, as Hirsh is a pitcher that I must see first. On the surface, I see no value on the Padres.

I am really surprised to see the Tigers undervalued a bit against a Royals team, but in my opinion, they are a bit in this game. I value them at -171, and would enter a position at
-151. But I doubt it will drop to where I feel they warrant a play. But the time to bet on Verlander is early when he is fresh.

Jibba,
When I derived a line for the Cardinals game before the lines came out yesterday, I was expecting them to be a play. I valued them at -108, and thought they might be a dog on the road. But it is not the case. The big pitching disparity that we agree upon was fully factored into the opening line, and line movement has made the Cardinals a bit overvalued. With the way they are playing, they don’t warrant laying odds on the road. I would bet them at +107, something that they won’t get near in this game. But I am fine with that, as they are not that good of a team.

I am adding another play soon, and will be back with a write up.

Good luck.

Thanks much for the fast action/reply.

I'm in Dallas area, and Opening Day for Tex Rangers. It is very cool (weather) here today, a little windy. Wakefield going against Rangers, and if I remember correctly, last time he pitched here, they jacked him up good. I'm on your picks, but I'm gonna go against Sox today, Rangers will come out swinging, might be a very high score today with wind blowing out of the north! That knuckle junk will be flying out backed by north winds gusting to 25mph! Straight out to any field, r, middle, or left. Just an FYI.

Thanks. I'm going back and read your original post and work on it. (rangers start early today, as well)

US
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
2,016
Tokens
Cubs @ Brewers
Play: Brewers -116
Intrinsic Value: -130
Consider Betting Price: -117
Comment:

The Cubs once again started the season playing well below their potential. They might have to wait another day before they play to form, as they are up against a favorable situational pitcher primed for a breakout season. If Bush’s age, Whip to ERA disparity ratio, and quality pitches are any future indicator, and Bush should improve nicely off of last year. No matter the team, Bush has always carried one of the higher disparities of home vs. away numbers in the league, and last year, he was one of the few pitchers that actually had a WHIP below one at home. He is hard to hit, and can limit the long ball well. His only problem is his inability to pitch to left handed hitters effectively, something that he is getting progressively better at. The Cubs best hitters are all from the right side, which he has shown little problems against. He faced the Cubs five times last year and handled them well. This holds especially true in his three home starts against them, as they were all quality starts. He is backed by a bullpen with depth and is well rested. Both lineups are much more potent at home, so home field advantage is magnified in this game.

Rich Hill is a bit of a concern in this game, as his performances are heavily dependent on the type of lineup he is up against. He has a downright filthy curveball but lacks control at times, therefore, needs to go up against a lineup that lacks patience. The Brewers lack such. However, he has yet to show he could handle the pressure of pitching on the road, as his numbers last year away from home were alarming, although in limited innings. He has also been bothered by a blister problem that could be a problem. He gives up his fair share of walks, and struggles to locate against left handed bats, something that he will have to overcome in this game. His curveball takes time getting used to, and having seen him twice last year should help the Brewers lineup. He breaks down early in games, and shouldn’t see more than five innings in this game. Although he is backed by a solid bullpen, it is a bullpen that doesn’t look sharp, as a few of their pitchers seem to not have their arm strength up to par. The Brewers are better rested.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Interesting play. Two somewhat unknown pitchers with high expectations going head to head. Actually wish I could watch this one. Thanks for the plays and BOL. On all of them with ya.

And Uncle Steve, as a big Sox fan I can tell you that Texas has given Wakefield more trouble than any other ballpark. Going against him in that spot isn't a bad idea. That said, he's very focused on putting up a good performance there.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,263
Messages
13,450,019
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com