Jibba's Wed MLB

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Favorites: 28-10 for +13.87 units (73.7%)
Underdogs: 7-4 for +4.67 units (63.6%)
Total: 35-14 for +19.8 units (71.4%)

Well I lost a little over a unit yesterday I believe. Day didn't turn out as I had hoped after a 2-0 start in the early games. Regarding yesterday's games, I was very impressed with Toronton and Chacin. It was a great game to watch but unfortunately turned on an error by Lugo (although scored a hit). Props to Jays backers though. I also was off base on how Oakland and NY would react to the emotional game Monday night. Live and learn. I like the card today and hope to get back on track.

Cincinatti -134: To me, this play is largely about the pitching. Harang does not get enough credit in the eyes of the public IMO, and he pitched great against Houston last season. In 4 starts against the Astros, he went 4-0 with a 2.76 ERA, a 0.92 WHIP, a .208 BAA, and 23 strikeouts against only 5 walks. He pitched better on the road last year and was prone to the HR at home, but I think he can take it to the next level this year. I'm only hoping that he can stop Berkman, who's always hit him well.

On the other side, Chris Sampson takes the Hill for Houston. Sampson looked decent in 5 innings against the Cubs in his first start last week (started season a reliever), but left the game with a tightened calf muscle. He'll have a somewhat hot Reds offense to deal with, which has scored 17 runs in their last 2 games. 1.34 units to win 1.

Chicago (NL) -103: I love this spot. We have a current public favorite in Atlanta going up against a Cubs team that couldn't have looked much worse over the past week and a half. But I don't think we'll get many shots with Zambrano at basically even money against a mediocre team like the Braves. I also like this spot for Zambrano because he was a better pitcher on the road last year. In 14 starts on the road, he went 9-1 with an ERA under 3. He's also looked great in 2 career starts in Turner Field, going 1-0 with a 0.75 ERA and a .105 BAA. Zambrano is one of the best pitchers in the league and should not be getting virtually even money with the Braves.

The biggest argument you're likely to see for taking the Braves today is that the Cubs are awful. Sure . . . they've played awful lately. But they're not as bad as they've looked. I think getting away from Wrigley might even be good for them and help with some of the pressure. I know Atlanta owned the Cubs last year, and that makes me slightly weary of this one, but I can't pass up Zambrano at this price. 1.03 units to win 1.

Will post more in a bit. I currently have leans on Arizona, NYM and KC. Looking hard at a bunch of other games, as there are a lot of good ones on the card today.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Jibba,

Does yesterday's extra inning game concern you at all?

I don't put all that much stock in stuff like this. They're all professionals and can handle the extra innings. Zambrano is still going to be Zambrano. And it would appear that the line accounts for the long game yesterday. If this game had been played last week before the public's perception of the Cubs plumetted and before the Cubs lost that emotional game yesterday, I think Zambrano v. Davies would be closer to -140 to -150.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
I'm really liking the Angels. Need to take another look or two, but that's pretty much all I have time for this morning.

I keep going back and forth on that one myself. Lackey has owned Oakland lately, but LA is really playing horrible ball these days. As much as I like Lackey, I'm not sure this offense can get out of their funk without Vlad. I expected them to yesterday but was flat out wrong.
 

Banned
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Messages
1,175
Tokens
I don't put all that much stock in stuff like this. They're all professionals and can handle the extra innings. Zambrano is still going to be Zambrano. And it would appear that the line accounts for the long game yesterday. If this game had been played last week before the public's perception of the Cubs plumetted and before the Cubs lost that emotional game yesterday, I think Zambrano v. Davies would be closer to -140 to -150.

That's funny, because last week I was fading Zambano (and I was right!). He's sometimes so inconsistent. This week, given the price, I agree with you. I think Zambrano will pitch a semi-decent game today, but regardless the Cubs bats have to be alive for them to win. Look at the games they have won this season: 4, 9, 6, 7, and 12. They are going to have to produce a fair amount of runs win today.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
That's funny, because last week I was fading Zambano (and I was right!). He's sometimes so inconsistent. This week, given the price, I agree with you. I think Zambrano will pitch a semi-decent game today, but regardless the Cubs bats have to be alive for them to win. Look at the games they have won this season: 4, 9, 6, 7, and 12. They are going to have to produce a fair amount of runs win today.

Definitely. But I just don't think Davies has gone from a pitcher with an 8.38 ERA in 14 starts last season to a pitcher with a 2.70 ERA in just one offseason. BOL on your plays.
 

Banned
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Messages
1,175
Tokens
Definitely. But I just don't think Davies has gone from a pitcher with an 8.38 ERA in 14 starts last season to a pitcher with a 2.70 ERA in just one offseason. BOL on your plays.

Oh, I agree.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Adding Philadelphia -140 to win 1 unit. Will post a writeup a bit later. But basically I think Eaton is a solid pitcher who has never lived up to expectations, partially due to injuries. Bergmann has looked ok, but with more walks than strikeouts, I think it's mostly been smoke and mirrors. Also still watching the NYM line, as it continues to grow, as well as the Colorado line which is doing the same. Still have leans on Arizona, KC, Baltimore, LAA, and Cleveland, but not sure which ones I'll play.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Kansas City +190: Bonderman is a very good young pitcher, but I just don't think he deserves this line in this matchup. His ERA at home last year was a mediocre 4.57 (3.63 on the road) and allowed opposing teams to hit .270 at Comerica (.248 on the road). Now Meche has never been a great road pitcher, but it's not like he's facing the Yankees offense today. The Tigers are without I-Rod behind the plate and that's a big hole left in a decent, but not great lineup. In a game that may turn into a bit of a pitcher's duel, I'll take the almost 2-1 odds we're getting on KC. I may regret actually putting money on a bad Royals team, but as we all know, they have to win sometime, and with their ace on the hill is the best time for it.

BOL to everyone. Back in a bit.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Took me 10 minutes to just get on the site (for some reason it's loading very slowly) so I don't have time to post my writeups with enough time before the games. Will post my plays and then follow them with the writeups.

Baltimore +122: 0.5 units to win 0.61

LA Angels +115: 1 unit to win 1.15
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Losing the KC game right now 3-1, although I still think it was a solid play the way the game has played out as a low scoring affair. Followed Mista for half a unit on the under, which is still looking good, so on a personal level I'm potentially looking at losing a half unit. But would be 0-1, down a unit officially if there's no change.

Baltimore +122: Lot of people on the D-Rays and Kazmir today. This is not disrespect to him, as I think he's a great young pitcher. I just think that Bedard is undervalued by the public, which is all over Tampa today. I do agree that Tampa gets a slight nod in pitching today, but this Baltimore offense makes up for it IMO. Bedard has played Tampa well in the past, so I'll take my chances with this line. Although I will admit that I've been feeling a bit of buyer's remorse since hitting submit. At least I kept it small on this one. 0.5 units to win 0.61.

LA Angels: I'll go with the popular pick on this one. Lackey has pitched the A's very well lately and this team has to start coming together eventually, even without Vlad. And although their offense hasn't done much lately, it's not like they're going up against a dominating offense in the A's. Love getting Lackey at + money. 1 unit to win 1.15.

BTW, Yahoo just put up the lineup for the Angels game:

LA:

Matthews
Cabrera
Izturis
Anderson
Kotchman
Hillenbrand
Aybar
Molina
Willits

Oakland:

Stewart
Swisher
Chavez
Piazza
Walker
Crosby
Buck
Kendall
Scutaro
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Damnit. For the sake of full disclosure, my play on LA never officially went through and there is no live betting on this one so it's too late. I'll still gladly stand by it as an official play for my record, but just wanted to get it out there. Disappointed as I liked that one. Will be adding a play or two within an hour.

Oh . . . and go Kansas City baby!! John Buck you are the new Marco Scutaro. :lol:
 

New member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
4,087
Tokens
Alright. KC with the nice come from behind win to put me at 1-0 for +1.9 units on the day so far. Like I said, I unfortunately missed the LAA/Oak bet, but so be it. Like I said, I'll still include it on my record so I'm still rooting for them. Wanted to wait on a game or two, but my internet was screwy at home last night so I'm putting them in now to get them official.

NY Mets +113: Dontrelle is a very good pitcher, but he was much better on the road last year and has started off this season in the same fashion. Maine has the stuff to match Willis pitch for pitch in this game. And the Mets' offense definitely gets the nod in this one. Add to that that they're a very solid team on the road and I think taking +112 is a solid play. 1 unit to win 1.13.

Arizona -115: I know . . . another big public play to go along with the Angels, but Zona really should win this one. San Diego is not playing their best ball right now and send old David Wells to the mound. Until he shows me he's still got a couple good games left in him, I'll take the D-Backs with Webb on the mound at -115 everyday. I know Webb has never been great against the Padres, but I can't see him not being motivated to get the monkey of a bad start off his back tonight. 1.15 units to win 1.

Chicago (AL) -113: The Chi Sox disappointed me last night and looked like they just never really showed up. Although Chicago hasn't looked very solid this year, they are a much better team than these Rangers. And Buehrle is a much better pitcher than Milwood IMO. While none of his numbers from last year were very impressive, he's definitely a better pitcher at home than he is on the road. There's nothing one specific reason for this play. I just think the number is low for a team that, overall, is far better than the Texas Rangers IMO. 1.13 units to win 1.

Pittsburgh +125: I think an argument could be made that the Pirates should be favored in this one, or at least around even money. Pittsburgh is playing solid ball right now, and they've been doing it on the road. The Brewers, on the other hand, have been hit or miss on any given day. And with Vargas going, there aren't many teams in the majors Milwaukee should be favored over. I've always seen him as a below average to straight up bad starting pitcher. And he's never been able to pitch well at home. Maholm has never really lived up to expectations, but I'd take him over Vargas any day. And at +125, I think the price is right. 1 unit to win 1.25.

I'm considering a small play on the Twins, but don't want to push my luck after the KC win today. Part of me wants to go right back to the Tribe with Sowers pitching, but I'm not getting a good feel for that one. Anyway, my card is bigger than I'd like today as is, but I put in a lot of time with these plays so I feel confident. As always, BOL to everyone on their plays today.

Final card as of now:

Kansas City +190: 1 unit to win 1.9 (win)
Cincinatti -134: 1.34 units to win 1
Chicago (NL) -103: 1.03 units to win 1
Philadelphia -140: 1.40 units to win 1
Baltimore +122: 0.5 units to win 0.61
LA Angels +115: 1 unit to win 1.15 (play was not properly submitted but will count for record purposes)
NY Mets +113: 1 unit to win 1.13
Arizona -115: 1.15 units to win 1
Chicago (AL) -113: 1.13 units to win 1
Pittsburgh +125: 1 unit to win 1.25
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,706
Messages
13,453,618
Members
99,429
Latest member
AnthonyPoi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com