Agreed. I had the winning side, so it didn't matter. Just curious as I've never seen it come up. I can't think exactly what rule it falls under but no there is a house rule stating "protests, forfeits, etc. will not overturn results".
I remember a few months ago some guy came in to the book and thought we would grade his USC season wins under if they had to forfeit games in 2005 for Reggie Bush. So it is covered.
I remember a few months ago some guy came in to the book and thought we would grade his USC season wins under if they had to forfeit games in 2005 for Reggie Bush. So it is covered.
Can't see any logic why it would have any effect for any sport. It opens up a can of worms. The sports body rules on the final outcome and that is the result for betting purposes.
In horse racing once the result is official any protest or subsequent disqualification due to drug tests is moot for betting purposes.
In horse racing once the result is official any protest or subsequent disqualification due to drug tests is moot for betting purposes.
If Bet Jamaica takes my $$ back after the O's win, I am driving to Sam Perlozzo's house and asking him for the 2 c-notes. He had to be told three innings later by fellow coach Tom Trebelhorn about the rule.
I like Perlozzo, but several of us at the bar immediately said that run should have counted and could not figure out why there was no protest to the umps.
Three innings and two Irish Car Bombs later, they protested but I was too drunk to care.
I like Perlozzo, but several of us at the bar immediately said that run should have counted and could not figure out why there was no protest to the umps.
Three innings and two Irish Car Bombs later, they protested but I was too drunk to care.
