I have a new "Sopranos" betting system.

Search

"I like ketchup. It's like tomato wine."
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
10,015
Tokens
You bet against whatever Tony bets. He's ice cold!!!! Should never bet against the Mavs. :lolBIG:
 

Self appointed RX World Champion Handicapper
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
15,052
Tokens
how bout the crazy kid and the columbine reference this week..

eeerrriieee .. knowing this was filmed months ago..
 

Rx Realist
Joined
Dec 21, 2003
Messages
2,731
Tokens
http://www.aolsportsblog.com/2007/04/29/why-tony-soprano-bet-on-a-fake-nfl-game/

Why Tony Soprano Bet on a Fake NFL Game

Posted Apr 29th 2007 9:52PM by Michael David Smith

If you're planning to watch this week's episode of The Sopranos but haven't seen it yet, you might want to skip this post.

On tonight's Sopranos, Tony Soprano bet on a football game. He watched the game on television, and it was portrayed as an actual NFL game between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Buffalo Bills.

At one point the announcer even referred to "Losman," as in J.P. Losman, the Bills' starting quarterback. But if you looked closely you probably noticed that it wasn't actually an NFL game. The reason is that the NFL strictly guards the use of images from its games. Before any television show or movie can show footage from an NFL game, the league has to approve the script. And given that Tony Soprano was illegally gambling on this game and watching it surrounded by topless women, you can bet that the NFL would not have approved this script.

The NFL previously turned down the producers of Brokeback Mountain when they asked for the rights to show a brief snippet of an NFL game. Unless the NFL approves of the content of a script, the NFL doesn't allow its games to be shown. And that's why when you watched The Sopranos, Tony was watching a fake NFL game.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
God forbid the NFL acknowledge people bet on their product....the NFL is so full of itself with all these freaking infringement rules and dress codes..
 

New member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
1,415
Tokens
They must have changed the script a bit after the NFL footage was not allowed. He ended up only listening to the radio for scores and reading the newspaper.
 

too bad!
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
733
Tokens
http://www.aolsportsblog.com/2007/04/29/why-tony-soprano-bet-on-a-fake-nfl-game/

Why Tony Soprano Bet on a Fake NFL Game

Posted Apr 29th 2007 9:52PM by Michael David Smith

If you're planning to watch this week's episode of The Sopranos but haven't seen it yet, you might want to skip this post.

On tonight's Sopranos, Tony Soprano bet on a football game. He watched the game on television, and it was portrayed as an actual NFL game between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Buffalo Bills.

At one point the announcer even referred to "Losman," as in J.P. Losman, the Bills' starting quarterback. But if you looked closely you probably noticed that it wasn't actually an NFL game. The reason is that the NFL strictly guards the use of images from its games. Before any television show or movie can show footage from an NFL game, the league has to approve the script. And given that Tony Soprano was illegally gambling on this game and watching it surrounded by topless women, you can bet that the NFL would not have approved this script.

The NFL previously turned down the producers of Brokeback Mountain when they asked for the rights to show a brief snippet of an NFL game. Unless the NFL approves of the content of a script, the NFL doesn't allow its games to be shown. And that's why when you watched The Sopranos, Tony was watching a fake NFL game.


I read last year or the year before that the footage they actually show is from the CFL. I read this after they had a scene at Bobby's house during Thanksgiving or some holiday.
 

too bad!
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
733
Tokens
Anyway during last night's show I found something funny. He made a bet on a harness race at Batavia Downs on the #1 horse. They show the odds on the #1 horse prior to him betting it. The odds were 2-1. He put some obscene amount on the #1 (between $10,000 and $20,000, I think). They show the race towards the end and the #1 horse still has odds of 2-1. Batavia Downs is and small track. They are lucky to get $10,000 in the win pool for 5 races combined. It would have been more realistic if they showed the odds at 1-9, which it would have been if he bet. If they did this though, it would have painted Tony as a bigger idiot for betting blind on a 1-9 shot at Batavia Downs.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
1,415
Tokens
Anyway during last night's show I found something funny. He made a bet on a harness race at Batavia Downs on the #1 horse. They show the odds on the #1 horse prior to him betting it. The odds were 2-1. He put some obscene amount on the #1 (between $10,000 and $20,000, I think). They show the race towards the end and the #1 horse still has odds of 2-1. Batavia Downs is and small track. They are lucky to get $10,000 in the win pool for 5 races combined. It would have been more realistic if they showed the odds at 1-9, which it would have been if he bet. If they did this though, it would have painted Tony as a bigger idiot for betting blind on a 1-9 shot at Batavia Downs.

Yes - good catch realizing that! Normally that would drive the odds down so much that he might as well have bet to show instead of win. Would have paid about the same anyway!
 

Old School
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,128
Tokens
Anyway during last night's show I found something funny. He made a bet on a harness race at Batavia Downs on the #1 horse. They show the odds on the #1 horse prior to him betting it. The odds were 2-1. He put some obscene amount on the #1 (between $10,000 and $20,000, I think). They show the race towards the end and the #1 horse still has odds of 2-1. Batavia Downs is and small track. They are lucky to get $10,000 in the win pool for 5 races combined. It would have been more realistic if they showed the odds at 1-9, which it would have been if he bet. If they did this though, it would have painted Tony as a bigger idiot for betting blind on a 1-9 shot at Batavia Downs.


But to bad 99% of the people that watch the show wouldnt understand that and truthfully is a meaningless point in the final 5 shows.
 

too bad!
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
733
Tokens
But to bad 99% of the people that watch the show wouldnt understand that and truthfully is a meaningless point in the final 5 shows.

I didn't say it was a monumental moment. The producers didn't drop the ball. I'm not going to write David Chase. It won't affect their probable writers guild award.
 

Old School
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,128
Tokens
:missingte

Just saying would kind of be a strange last 5 episodes if it was centered around explaining how harness racing works and how the odds work.

:banger:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,760
Tokens
The horse racing scene was inaccurate on SO many levels. Odds as were discussed earlier. They showed these guys like they were cheering for the horse about to finish, the first time they were approacing the 1/2 mile, then cheering again, then as they were to hit the wire. Bad editing. Also Batavia was bring shown, but off to the side of the main screen, Belmont Park was up. Belmont runs in the afternoon, Batavia at night. They were showing the payouts from the Grand Slam as the Batavia race was going off. That means Belmont still have one race left to run. Then to top this shit sundae of a scene, it was followed up by the screen changing to Los Alamitos. I would love to see the day that Los Al and Batavia and Belmont run at the same time.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,527
Messages
13,452,320
Members
99,418
Latest member
TennisMonger
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com