Is this good value?

Search

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
5,936
Tokens
i really want to put a bet on the Warriors and they are 10-1 to win finals

But Baron Davis is 25-1 to win Finals MVP

I think he is a lock to win it if they go the distance

Am i getting good value relative to the 10-1?
 

Woah, woah, Daddy's wrong, Mommy's right.
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
7,977
Tokens
considering they were 10-1 to win the last series I would have to say no. Beating Dallas for them was a hell of a lot easier than beating the next teams they play.

They are playing great basketball right now, but even if they win this next series, either team they run into (Phoe or SA) gives them absolute fits. Phoe is the same team only better at virtually every position and they do EVERYTHING GSW does but better. SA is SA, too fundamental and won't be pushed around or change their style of play like Dallas did.

The Dallas series was lightning in a bottle IMO, perfect confluence of events for GSW to pull off the upset. I would love to see them get to the finals, but I don't see it happening since they have to run through Phoe or SA.

As far as Davis goes, for the difference in price it is worth it if you wanted to the route of GSW winning it all, but I think Jackson could also win it if GSW were to win it all. What is Jackson to win MVP? If you want to take a flyer on GSW to win it all, I think taking those two to win MVP would pay better than GSW at 10-1.

I have to think Jax is higher than Davis, so say he is 40-1. Instead of 100 to win 1000 on GSW, 50 on Davis and 50 on Jackson would pay either +1200 or +1950. I don't see anyone else winning MVP from that team if they win.
 

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
5,936
Tokens
Richardson i was more scared of than Jackson
 

Woah, woah, Daddy's wrong, Mommy's right.
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
7,977
Tokens
I think Richardson is too up and down. he also doesn't play well on the road. Jackson just doesn't care and is a more seasoned playoff guy (he won a title w/ SA), he is also more well rounded (defense and rebounding) and look how he stepped up last night w/ Davis hurting. You could probably throw Richardson in too and still provide for a better payout with little more risk.

If Richardson is also 40-1

50 on Davis = +1150
50 on Jackson or Richardson = +1900

Risk = $150 instead of $100 for a $1000 payout.

However, I don't think there is any value as I don't see them getting past SA or Phoe.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
255
Tokens
The MVP almost certainly is the guy who can attract multiple defenders, and who can create own shots, and still be able to score and assist. Davis has to perform like MVP in order for GS to win.
 

Rx. Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
2,879
Tokens
This is like betting the Lakers to win the championship last season had they advanced past the Suns, which was very likely had Odom grabbed that final rebound. Certainly no one would've been claiming Lakers would win the championship. Lakers matched up well with just one elite team and that just happened to be the Suns, just like GS matched up well with the Mavs. Doesn't mean they can get by Spurs or Suns as effortlessly as over the Mavs.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
732
Tokens
Personally, I think they lose in 5 to whoever wins game 7 in the Utah/Houston game, but to answer your question, yes. The only conceivable way they would win it all is if Davis continues to play like a possessed man.
 

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
5,936
Tokens
Guys i am not putting real money into this just 25 bucks so i can root for the Warriors

I figured if the Warriors actually ran the table, wasnt it worth it to bet on BD to win MVP instead
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,910
Tokens
Guys i am not putting real money into this just 25 bucks so i can root for the Warriors

I figured if the Warriors actually ran the table, wasnt it worth it to bet on BD to win MVP instead


I absolutely agree that if you are sold on betting the warriors in some way, Baron is the better play than the warriors at 10.
 

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
5,936
Tokens
I absolutely agree that if you are sold on betting the warriors in some way, Baron is the better play than the warriors at 10.
Thx thats what i wanted to know

No fun rooting for Cinderella if no money on the line
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,224
Messages
13,449,733
Members
99,402
Latest member
jb52197
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com