Penny looks like the obvious, one-sided play = that being said, the ML is revolting against this fact. check it:
OV LINE -120
OP LINE -125
current line as of 900am -117
then, as the day progresses:
-117, -113, -110, -110, -110, -108
Penny ERA last three 0.47
Santana ERA last three 5.12
Penny team wl 7-1
Santana team wl 2-5
Penny ind wl 5-0
Santana ind wl 2-5
Line goes from OV -120 Penny to -110. In spite of all this heavy, obvious number info for Penny.
Take LAA for the win.
US
OV LINE -120
OP LINE -125
current line as of 900am -117
then, as the day progresses:
-117, -113, -110, -110, -110, -108
Penny ERA last three 0.47
Santana ERA last three 5.12
Penny team wl 7-1
Santana team wl 2-5
Penny ind wl 5-0
Santana ind wl 2-5
Line goes from OV -120 Penny to -110. In spite of all this heavy, obvious number info for Penny.
Take LAA for the win.
US
US, so the underlying factor is how the line movement & "obvious numbers" is convincing you to take LAA? I can see the reasoning, but let me ask you a question.
If you hadn't seen the line at all & someone says you have LAD/Penny at LAA/Santana tonight. What line would you have capped this at? -120 on Santana or what? Just wondering.
Then, after determining the line you created, assuming -120 or less.... you think there's value on +106 or such playing against a top-tier pitcher regardless of ballpark & opposing pitcher?
* CalvinTy
If you hadn't seen the line at all & someone says you have LAD/Penny at LAA/Santana tonight. What line would you have capped this at? -120 on Santana or what? Just wondering.
Then, after determining the line you created, assuming -120 or less.... you think there's value on +106 or such playing against a top-tier pitcher regardless of ballpark & opposing pitcher?
* CalvinTy
