wtf is the hold up in wash vs. the cards?

Search

New member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
2,281
Tokens
WHY The FVCk would You Delay A game With 2 outs N a FUll Fvckn Count ? ....Don't They Know WE NEED to GRADE The Results...ONE more GOddamn Pitch ....Now, EVereything Will Be Considered A Fvckn Push Unless They Make it official...UNfvcknbelievable !!!!
 

morally bankrupt
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
5,005
Tokens
Not to be a smartass but nothing would have been considered a push. I believe they would have reverted to the last completed inning in which the over was already decided and St. Louis was still winning.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
2,281
Tokens
Not to be a smartass but nothing would have been considered a push. I believe they would have reverted to the last completed inning in which the over was already decided and St. Louis was still winning.


you r wrong again bro....vegas rules state that the top of the ninth inning has to be COMPLETED for any totals to take effect !
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
Not to be a smartass but nothing would have been considered a push. I believe they would have reverted to the last completed inning in which the over was already decided and St. Louis was still winning.
They wouldn't have reverted back. It would have 8-6 final score. ML's would have action, RL and totals no action.
 

morally bankrupt
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
5,005
Tokens
Well, you said 'everything' was going to be a push. Totals might be an exception. I thought we saw this in a Cubs game earlier this year when Pittsburgh took the lead in the top of the inning but the game was called because of rain. Pittsburgh was graded a loss, Cubs a win because all wagers had to be graded the same night and ML reverted to last completed inning.

I could be wrong and delusional though.
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
Well, you said 'everything' was going to be a push. Totals might be an exception. I thought we saw this in a Cubs game earlier this year when Pittsburgh took the lead in the top of the inning but the game was called because of rain. Pittsburgh was graded a loss, Cubs a win because all wagers had to be graded the same night and ML reverted to last completed inning.

I could be wrong and delusional though.
The difference in that game was that the visiting team took the lead in the top half. Then they revert back for the ML.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
2,281
Tokens
Well, you said 'everything' was going to be a push. Totals might be an exception. I thought we saw this in a Cubs game earlier this year when Pittsburgh took the lead in the top of the inning but the game was called because of rain. Pittsburgh was graded a loss, Cubs a win because all wagers had to be graded the same night.

I could be wrong and delusional though.


IF They made the Game Official AFTER the 8th inning ...the CARDS Would WIN on the Moneyline , But totals n Run lines would be Pushes / no Bets .

But As the Situation Was in the 9th , THere Was A CHANCE the Game WOULD BE SUSPENDED into The Next Day ....IN That CASE , EVERYTHING Wouldve Been a PUSH/ Non BET ..that's What I was refering to !
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
IF They made the Game Official AFTER the 8th inning ...the CARDS Would WIN on the Moneyline , But totals n Run lines would be Pushes / no Bets .

But As the Situation Was in the 9th , THere Was A CHANCE the Game WOULD BE SUSPENDED into The Next Day ....IN That CASE , EVERYTHING Wouldve Been a PUSH/ Non BET ..that's What I was refering to !
You're wrong. ML bets would have had action if they had not finished it.
 

New member
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
9,387
Tokens
IF They made the Game Official AFTER the 8th inning ...the CARDS Would WIN on the Moneyline , But totals n Run lines would be Pushes / no Bets .

But As the Situation Was in the 9th , THere Was A CHANCE the Game WOULD BE SUSPENDED into The Next Day ....IN That CASE , EVERYTHING Wouldve Been a PUSH/ Non BET ..that's What I was refering to !

"If a game is called <b>or suspended</b>, the winner is determined by the score after the last full inning unless the home team scores to tie, or takes the lead in the bottom half of the inning, in which case the winner is determined by the score at the time the game is called. Monies will be refunded if the home team ties the game and it is then suspended. "

StL ML would win if the game was suspended

rule taken from pinny, but it's pretty universal
 

New member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
2,281
Tokens
You're wrong. ML bets would have had action if they had not finished it.


illini....IF THE GAME WAS SUSPENDED into the Next DAY ...Then Moneylines Would NOT Be Graded !!!!!

NOw What YOU are referring To IS The Game Be' in Officially CALLED in the Ninth.THEN OF cOURSE The CARDS WOULD WIN on the MONEYLINE !!!

BUT...There Are Times When They Continue / or SUSPEND the Game into NEXT day ....THEN , I BELIEVE I AM 100% CORRECT ......NOTHING COUNTS including Moneylines...that's What I was Referring To Bud! SO YOU're WRONG !!!...hee..hee:thumbsup:
 

morally bankrupt
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
5,005
Tokens
illini....IF THE GAME WAS SUSPENDED into the Next DAY ...Then Moneylines Would NOT Be Graded !!!!!

NOw What YOU are referring To IS The Game Be' in Officially CALLED in the Ninth.THEN OF cOURSE The CARDS WOULD WIN on the MONEYLINE !!!

BUT...There Are Times When They Continue / or SUSPEND the Game into NEXT day ....THEN , I BELIEVE I AM 100% CORRECT ......NOTHING COUNTS including Moneylines...that's What I was Referring To Bud! SO YOU're WRONG !!!...hee..hee:thumbsup:

No, moneylines would have counted no matter what. They would not have carried over to the next day because St. Lous was still winning when the game was delayed.
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
illini....IF THE GAME WAS SUSPENDED into the Next DAY ...Then Moneylines Would NOT Be Graded !!!!!

NOw What YOU are referring To IS The Game Be' in Officially CALLED in the Ninth.THEN OF cOURSE The CARDS WOULD WIN on the MONEYLINE !!!

BUT...There Are Times When They Continue / or SUSPEND the Game into NEXT day ....THEN , I BELIEVE I AM 100% CORRECT ......NOTHING COUNTS including Moneylines...that's What I was Referring To Bud! SO YOU're WRONG !!!...hee..hee:thumbsup:
Cardinals win the game and the moneylines win at the books, if it rains until 6am. There would not be a suspended game in this situation.
 

morally bankrupt
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
5,005
Tokens
They wouldn't have reverted back. It would have 8-6 final score. ML's would have action, RL and totals no action.

You're right and wrong according to the rule.

"If a game is called or suspended, the winner is determined by the score after the last full inning unless the home team scores to tie, or takes the lead in the bottom half of the inning, in which case the winner is determined by the score at the time the game is called. Monies will be refunded if the home team ties the game and it is then suspended. "

Would have been 8-4, not 8-6 ML graded. Scores would have been reverted according to that phrase to last inning and the 2 runs not counted from the top of the 9th.
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
You're right and wrong according to the rule.

"If a game is called or suspended, the winner is determined by the score after the last full inning unless the home team scores to tie, or takes the lead in the bottom half of the inning, in which case the winner is determined by the score at the time the game is called. Monies will be refunded if the home team ties the game and it is then suspended. "

Would have been 8-4, not 8-6 ML graded. Scores would have been reverted according to that phrase to last inning and the 2 runs not counted from the top of the 9th.
The official score would have been 8-6. All stats from the top half count. If the books want to make it a 8-4 final, so be it. But it wouldn't matter anyway, as the RL's and totals don't count.
 

morally bankrupt
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
5,005
Tokens
Vegas would have graded it 8-4. If all stats were counted in grading, the scenerio in question (The Pittsburgh/Cubs game) then Pittsburgh would have been graded a win after taking the lead in the top half of the inning. Instead they were a loss, despite scoring more runs. I'm not questioning whether the stats would have counted in the game, but grading wise it would have been 8-4. And as you said they would 'Not have reverted' (the score), is the only reason why I'm aruging this now stale conversation.
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
Vegas would have graded it 8-4. If all stats were counted in grading, the scenerio in question (The Pittsburgh/Cubs game) then Pittsburgh would have been graded a win after taking the lead in the top half of the inning. Instead they were a loss, despite scoring more runs. I'm not questioning whether the stats would have counted in the game, but grading wise it would have been 8-4. And as you said they would 'Not have reverted' (the score), is the only reason why I'm aruging this now stale conversation.
Whether or not the books revert the score is irrelevant. Who wins is the only thing that's important, since moneylines are the only bets with action. MLB would not have reverted. In that Cubs game, the Cubs were trailing when they took the lead in the top half. The game was then suspended, and Pittsburgh was declared the winner at the books after reverting back.

Kind of fucked up. Cubs were leading when the game was suspended, and they ended up winning the game. But they lost the moneyline. I think the only reason the books won't change it is because if it rains out the next day, they don't want a pending straight bet for 2 months. They want the bettors to have funds available to lose to them. Because really, they should change the rule. Betting on the moneyline should be a winner if your team wins. That's the definition of a moneyline bet.
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
Vegas would have graded it 8-4. If all stats were counted in grading, the scenerio in question (The Pittsburgh/Cubs game) then Pittsburgh would have been graded a win after taking the lead in the top half of the inning. Instead they were a loss, despite scoring more runs. I'm not questioning whether the stats would have counted in the game, but grading wise it would have been 8-4. And as you said they would 'Not have reverted' (the score), is the only reason why I'm aruging this now stale conversation.
The reason why reverting back meant something in that game is because the visiting team took the lead. That was a suspended game. This one wouldn't have been.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 15, 2005
Messages
1,191
Tokens
Whether or not the books revert the score is irrelevant. Who wins is the only thing that's important, since moneylines are the only bets with action. MLB would not have reverted. In that Cubs game, the Cubs were trailing when they took the lead in the top half. The game was then suspended, and Pittsburgh was declared the winner at the books after reverting back.

Kind of fucked up. Cubs were leading when the game was suspended, and they ended up winning the game. But they lost the moneyline. I think the only reason the books won't change it is because if it rains out the next day, they don't want a pending straight bet for 2 months. They want the bettors to have funds available to lose to them. Because really, they should change the rule. Betting on the moneyline should be a winner if your team wins. That's the definition of a moneyline bet.


Stupidest rule that I have or will ever see in my life.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,706
Messages
13,453,643
Members
99,429
Latest member
AnthonyPoi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com