paul maholm, kill yourself ... youre an underdog to jeff weaver - wow ...

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
8,334
Tokens
crazy thing is that i used to be a big fan of weaver back when he was starting out as a damn good under the radar pitcher with detroit. but this motherfu.cker (and im stating the obvious here) is an absolute gas can right now.

0-6 with a 10.97 era.

... and he's favored at about 6/5 over paul maholm. that has to make pirates fans feel great. if thats not an indictment of their former #1 draft pick maholm, im not sure what is.

not only has weaver been horrible, but the mariners arent scoring for him either. theyve been outscored 48-10 the last 5 times weaver has taken the ball.

maholm should be ashamed to be a dog in this game.
 

antigravity
Joined
Jan 19, 2006
Messages
2,640
Tokens
i was kinda of shocked to see this line as well. sadly though, i dont have enough faith in Maholm to outpitch Weaver to bet him haha
 

THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX.
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
15,349
Tokens
Seattle's lineup hits lefties very hard. Haevn't scoured the lines yet but if Beltre was in there I'd probably hammer Seattle. Maybe I still will. I'm dumb.


Ughhhhh Weaver? I'd play the over on these two bums. Although, keep in mind, Maholm pitched a great game his last time out....I think.......pretty sure I faded his ass and lost.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
1,752
Tokens
Beltre was in the game last night. Something wrong with these slackers.

Notice, there are several teams right now who's 'chemistry' is missing.

Something (don't know what) is wrong.

Texas Rangers - my GOD - how F;ing awful can you be? I think the super-star combo of Sosa-Lofton + that manager (if you can call him that) + NO pitching, I mean NONE = disaster. They lost to a crappy pitcher and team last night at home, line dropped from Cubs -135 to about -120 at kick.

Lost 5-4, couldn't even f'ing hit the over, no bats last nite, either.

They might be the best "fade-till-end-of-season" team in the league, I'm not kidding. I have won ONCE with an over, and lost every time I think they have even a remote possiblity of a WIN. HA! Fade.

Mets look like they have issues = but I'm not close enough to know about those guys, only that they have cost me (and others) $$$.

Teams with high-payrolls should play better, don't you think? But, not always the case. Hmmmmm......maybe too much f'ing around money.


gl


US
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,529
Messages
13,452,372
Members
99,422
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com