Did you just compare Liriano to Linecum?Nathan had one good year as a reliever. Every year there are about 20 relievers who pitch that well, then end up sucking.
Liriano was a great prospect, but look at how lincecum has pitched so far this year and how many top pitching prospects turn into busts. And lets not forget that Liriano is out of the season with elbow problems. Not a good sign for a young pitcher.
Boof bonser has a 4.5 ERA this year and is 26 years old already.
That trade was only horrible if you are results oriented.
I guess I hear what you're saying, in that they had no idea that Liriano was gonna be that good. But AJ only had one year left, and they gave up a motherload of potential for a rent-a-player.Nathan had one good year as a reliever. Every year there are about 20 relievers who pitch that well, then end up sucking.
Liriano was a great prospect, but look at how lincecum has pitched so far this year and how many top pitching prospects turn into busts. And lets not forget that Liriano is out of the season with elbow problems. Not a good sign for a young pitcher.
Boof bonser has a 4.5 ERA this year and is 26 years old already.
That trade was only horrible if you are results oriented.
Nathan had one good year as a reliever. Every year there are about 20 relievers who pitch that well, then end up sucking.
Liriano was a great prospect, but look at how lincecum has pitched so far this year and how many top pitching prospects turn into busts. And lets not forget that Liriano is out of the season with elbow problems. Not a good sign for a young pitcher.
Boof bonser has a 4.5 ERA this year and is 26 years old already.
That trade was only horrible if you are results oriented.
nathan only one good year??? try the guy has dominated since he was traded to minny... here are his numbers for minnesota...<TABLE class=player_stats cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR class=bg2 vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD align=left>
2006
</TD><TD align=left>
MIN
</TD><TD>
68.1
</TD><TD>
0
</TD><TD>
7
</TD><TD>
0
</TD><TD>
36
</TD><TD>
95
</TD><TD>
16
</TD><TD>
38
</TD><TD>
1.586
</TD><TD>
0.793
</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD align=left>2005</TD><TD align=left>MIN</TD><TD>70.0</TD><TD>0</TD><TD>7</TD><TD>4</TD><TD>43</TD><TD>94</TD><TD>22</TD><TD>46</TD><TD>2.700</TD><TD>0.971</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD align=left>2004</TD><TD align=left>MIN</TD><TD>72.1</TD><TD>0</TD><TD>1</TD><TD>2</TD><TD>44</TD><TD>89</TD><TD>23</TD><TD>48</TD><TD>1.623</TD><TD>0.985</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
nathan only one good year??? try the guy has dominated since he was traded to minny... here are his numbers for minnesota...<table class="player_stats" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr class="bg2" align="right" height="17" valign="center"><td align="left">
2006
</td><td align="left">
MIN
</td><td>
68.1
</td><td>
0
</td><td>
7
</td><td>
0
</td><td>
36
</td><td>
95
</td><td>
16
</td><td>
38
</td><td>
1.586
</td><td>
0.793
</td></tr><tr class="bg2" align="right" height="17" valign="center"><td align="left">2005</td><td align="left">MIN</td><td>70.0</td><td>0</td><td>7</td><td>4</td><td>43</td><td>94</td><td>22</td><td>46</td><td>2.700</td><td>0.971</td></tr><tr class="bg2" align="right" height="17" valign="center"><td align="left">2004</td><td align="left">MIN</td><td>72.1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>44</td><td>89</td><td>23</td><td>48</td><td>1.623</td><td>0.985</td></tr></tbody></table>
He must have been talking about his numbers before being traded.nathan only one good year??? try the guy has dominated since he was traded to minny... here are his numbers for minnesota...<TABLE class=player_stats cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR class=bg2 vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD align=left>
2006
</TD><TD align=left>
MIN
</TD><TD>
68.1
</TD><TD>
0
</TD><TD>
7
</TD><TD>
0
</TD><TD>
36
</TD><TD>
95
</TD><TD>
16
</TD><TD>
38
</TD><TD>
1.586
</TD><TD>
0.793
</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD align=left>2005</TD><TD align=left>MIN</TD><TD>70.0</TD><TD>0</TD><TD>7</TD><TD>4</TD><TD>43</TD><TD>94</TD><TD>22</TD><TD>46</TD><TD>2.700</TD><TD>0.971</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD align=left>2004</TD><TD align=left>MIN</TD><TD>72.1</TD><TD>0</TD><TD>1</TD><TD>2</TD><TD>44</TD><TD>89</TD><TD>23</TD><TD>48</TD><TD>1.623</TD><TD>0.985</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I was referring to before he was traded. But thanks for pointing out the obvious.
Yeah, lincecum is healthy and Liriano is coming off elbow surgery after his first full year in the majors.
Lincecum was one of the top pitching prospects in baseball coming into this year and has not had his elbow opened up.
not trying to be a dick but u said he had ONE good year, did u mean one good year in sf because here is his line the year before getting<table class="player_stats" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr class="bg2" align="right" height="17" valign="center"><td align="left">
2003
</td><td align="left">SF</td><td>79.0</td><td>0</td><td>12</td><td>4</td><td>0</td><td>83</td><td>33</td><td>51</td><td>2.962</td><td>1.063</td></tr></tbody></table>
those are great numbers for a reliever, sf fucked up big time with this deal... for a one year guy if they traded nathan himself that wouldve been plenty...