Anyone betting Nadal?

Biggamer3

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time

Joined

Aug 9, 2006

Messages

5,936

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #1

+500 sounds really enticing though i know nothing about tennis other than Federer is great

Will lay a small bet on Nadal, Anyone know which channel hosts it, USA or ESPN or CBS?

and what time will the match be

 

SayHeyKid

"Here we go again"

Joined

Jul 1, 2006

Messages

4,507

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #2

Match will be on NBC.....I didn't bet Nadal. However, sportsbook layed a federer winning 1 grand slam this year at 20-1 before wimbledon, so i took that small. Hoping Nadal can pull it out, +500 is great value IMO.

 

Biggamer3

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time

Joined

Aug 9, 2006

Messages

5,936

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #3

THx, BTW what time?

 

SayHeyKid

"Here we go again"

Joined

Jul 1, 2006

Messages

4,507

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #4

9 am eastern according to pinnacle sports.

 

Biggamer3

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time

Joined

Aug 9, 2006

Messages

5,936

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #5

thx

 

nctarheelfans

DirtySanchez4Life

Joined

Aug 27, 2005

Messages

5,138

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #6

Roger owns Nadal on all surfaces but clay...........

Roger wins this.............

 

Railbird

The Great Govenor of California

Joined

Feb 21, 2001

Messages

15,972

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #7

guy is twice the scumbag Barry Bonds is. Im going to make a lot this summer fading NAdal.

 

nctarheelfans

DirtySanchez4Life

Joined

Aug 27, 2005

Messages

5,138

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #8

Rail,

Federer is a steal.....................

:money8:

 

gskiman

Member

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

3,441

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #9

nctarheelfans said:

Roger owns Nadal on all surfaces but clay...........

Roger wins this.............

Click to expand...

Not true.
Federer's record against Nadal
Hardcourt 2-2
Clay 1-6
Grass 1-0

 

nctarheelfans

DirtySanchez4Life

Joined

Aug 27, 2005

Messages

5,138

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #10

Ok........................

Then how is the over not the bet.........
Total Games In The Match


<table class="ctable3" border="0"><tbody><tr><td class="ctd1">3</td><td class="ctd2">Over 38.5 Games </td><td class="ctd3"> -125</td><td class="ctd4">WIN <input value="r1" name="idradiocn0" checked="checked" type="radio"> </td><td class="ctd5">RISK <input value="r2" name="idradiocn0" type="radio"> </td><td class="ctd6"><input size="5" name="idtextcn0" type="text"> </td></tr><tr><td class="ctd1">4</td><td class="ctd2">Under 38.5 Games
</td><td class="ctd3"> -115</td><td class="ctd4">WIN <input value="r1" name="idradiocn1" checked="checked" type="radio"> </td><td class="ctd5">RIS</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

RupertPupkin

I say vee cut off your Chonson !!!!

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

5,446

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #11

Im not sure what the line is now , but at +500 there is tremendous value in betting Nadal. When the two best players in the world face off , and you get 5/1 with one of them , its pretty much a no brainer to bet the dog. Would you wrather take +500 or lay -800 ... this isnt Ali against Quarry ... its a match between two studs , and yes Federer has had the edge sans clay, but Nadal is no slouch and outside of Roger is easilly second best around. I would have took Agassi plus the money against Sampras too.( and he did win a big one as a big dog more than once... I think ?)

 

nctarheelfans

DirtySanchez4Life

Joined

Aug 27, 2005

Messages

5,138

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #12

I just think that at the end of the day, the sun may get in Nadal's eyes causing him a couple of extra double faults.............uppy:

 

billhill999

New member

Joined

Jun 2, 2006

Messages

29,253

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #13

RupertPupkin said:

Im not sure what the line is now , but at +500 there is tremendous value in betting Nadal. When the two best players in the world face off , and you get 5/1 with one of them , its pretty much a no brainer to bet the dog. Would you wrather take +500 or lay -800 ... this isnt Ali against Quarry ... its a match between two studs , and yes Federer has had the edge sans clay, but Nadal is no slouch and outside of Roger is easilly second best around. I would have took Agassi plus the money against Sampras too.( and he did win a big one as a big dog more than once... I think ?)

Click to expand...

And I totally agree.
I am going to make a real small play on nadal, really small.

 

Railbird

The Great Govenor of California

Joined

Feb 21, 2001

Messages

15,972

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #14

I dont like -600 steals.

 

Railbird

The Great Govenor of California

Joined

Feb 21, 2001

Messages

15,972

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #15

This is Novak Djokoivic

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=435 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=TableSubheading colSpan=3>Miami</TD><TD class=TableSubheading align=right colSpan=2>USA</TD></TR><TR><TD class=TableSubheading>MS</TD><TD class=TableSubheading colSpan=2>21 Mar 2007 to 01 Apr 2007</TD><TD class=TableSubheading>Entry : DA</TD><TD class=TableSubheading align=right>Hard (O) </TD></TR><TR><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>128</TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>B</TD><TD class=TableCellEven colSpan=2 height=21>http://www.itftennis.com/mens/players/player.asp?player=</TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>BYE</TD></TR><TR><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>64</TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>W</TD><TD class=TableCellEven colSpan=2 height=21> Daniele BRACCIALI (ITA) </TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>7-6(4) 6-4</TD></TR><TR><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>32</TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>W</TD><TD class=TableCellEven colSpan=2 height=21> Michael LLODRA (FRA) </TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>6-4 6-1</TD></TR><TR><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>16</TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>W</TD><TD class=TableCellEven colSpan=2 height=21> Feliciano LOPEZ (ESP) </TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>6-0 6-3</TD></TR><TR><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>QF</TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>W</TD><TD class=TableCellEven colSpan=2 height=21> Rafael NADAL (ESP) </TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>6-3 6-4</TD></TR><TR><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>SF</TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>W</TD><TD class=TableCellEven colSpan=2 height=21> Andy MURRAY (GBR) </TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>6-1 6-0</TD></TR><TR><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>FR</TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>W</TD><TD class=TableCellEven colSpan=2 height=21> Guillermo CANAS (ARG) </TD><TD class=TableCellEven height=21>6-3 6-2 6-4</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

 

Railbird

The Great Govenor of California

Joined

Feb 21, 2001

Messages

15,972

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #16

18 months from now, Fed and Nadal will be 2 and 3.

 

slapshot

Member

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

19,209

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #17

Railbird said:

I dont like -600 steals.

Click to expand...

:toast: damn straight :toast:

 

billhill999

New member

Joined

Jun 2, 2006

Messages

29,253

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #18

slapshot said:

:toast: damn straight :toast:

Click to expand...

Agreed.
There is no such thing as a -600 steal.
I don't care how much bank you have, I can't speak for anybody else, but if you lay 6-1 on #1 v. #2, I'll be sweating that bet.

 

Biggamer3

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time

Joined

Aug 9, 2006

Messages

5,936

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #19

NAdal looking good guys
ties 1 set apiece

 

billhill999

New member

Joined

Jun 2, 2006

Messages

29,253

Tokens

• Jul 8, 2007

• #20

Biggamer3 said:

NAdal looking good guys
ties 1 set apiece

Click to expand...

And it could have been 2-0 Nadal.
I'm beggining to think upset here.
:money8: