Not sure it is worth the time and effort but after looking at a few posts on the RX about betting horses I have changed my mind a little. It all boils down to one HUGE point (and I cannot stress the word huge enough).
They don't add the money (from what I understand and I could be wrong) into the the track mutal pools. Being a follower of a few small harness tracks this means everything. Just putting $50 on a horse to win at a small harness track and you crush your odds. Offshore would not effect it.
Now dont get me wrong the track take sucks (but I havent added in the rebate factor either which helps) but if you follow a small (key word) harness track your competition is very weak, I should know I have seen it for nearly 20 years.
You would have to bet to win the majority of the time for a few reasons and it would be a true grind but this would give you your best chance to beat the track. There are so many overlays that you would not effect the odds on because there has been little or no money bet into the REAL track mutal pools.
Has anyone looked into this? The smaller the track the better. I know most here don't like harness racing but like a few have said (myself included) they can still see value on horses there from years of expierence.
I am sure books are making a killing booking horses but I have to believe that this gives is a huge point not talked about enough. It would be like being able to bet more than the max on a football game and they dont EVER move the line on you. Your effecting the odds but your not. Granted you have to be a decent capper and be able to beat the take but if you are than it can be beat.
Would like to hear what other horse players think about this.
They don't add the money (from what I understand and I could be wrong) into the the track mutal pools. Being a follower of a few small harness tracks this means everything. Just putting $50 on a horse to win at a small harness track and you crush your odds. Offshore would not effect it.
Now dont get me wrong the track take sucks (but I havent added in the rebate factor either which helps) but if you follow a small (key word) harness track your competition is very weak, I should know I have seen it for nearly 20 years.
You would have to bet to win the majority of the time for a few reasons and it would be a true grind but this would give you your best chance to beat the track. There are so many overlays that you would not effect the odds on because there has been little or no money bet into the REAL track mutal pools.
Has anyone looked into this? The smaller the track the better. I know most here don't like harness racing but like a few have said (myself included) they can still see value on horses there from years of expierence.
I am sure books are making a killing booking horses but I have to believe that this gives is a huge point not talked about enough. It would be like being able to bet more than the max on a football game and they dont EVER move the line on you. Your effecting the odds but your not. Granted you have to be a decent capper and be able to beat the take but if you are than it can be beat.
Would like to hear what other horse players think about this.