Good luck, flacapper & WVU. It felt like I was having popcorn watching side action in that MM thread. :toast:
With the deal about 100 bets, as WVU would know, that is quite a small sample so flacapper has a chance to succeed, but I do agree that in the long long long term, maintaining 60% is just not feasible. GL to you two again.
* CalvinTY
With the deal about 100 bets, as WVU would know, that is quite a small sample so flacapper has a chance to succeed, but I do agree that in the long long long term, maintaining 60% is just not feasible. GL to you two again.
* CalvinTY
LOL I am not stealing your thunder. I will continue to insist that 60% long term win rate is unachievable. Hit 60% in this thread and then continue on with your picks if you want. You will certainly get a chance to have a following. I wish you would have started this thread in the main forum as we all love a good challenge.
I am rooting for you to either win this bet or come close. Either way I know I made a good bet and I also set a fair line.
I am rooting for you to either win this bet or come close. Either way I know I made a good bet and I also set a fair line.
geez you really think im trying to do that?
you really are scared arent you?
this game was at 110 on betjam when i posted.
I already know that and dont want it any other way.
I only look for 110 games of course I see others but go over them.
Please have some respect and know that im only going to pick 110 games.
i understand the rules.
This is what I show for the Pit/SD Under line history below.
=====
Bet JamaicaPittsburgh Pirates vs. San Diego Padres
Totals
I actually have to ask "just where the boundaries are" because stopping a person from making a -115 MLB total wager is also ridiculous, IMHO.
However, I do understand that U8.5 +100 or Under 9 -120 are two essentially different bets. There would be an advantage for an Under 9 -120 bettor to at least push and then not count against the winning percentage.
So, I'm very nosy, grins, where is the line? Looks like you two are on different wavelengths on this.
Disclaimer: I recognized that bet because I had the Pit/SD Under 9 -115 at Skybook as one of my 2 funded book with that best juice at that point at -115, with the other one being BetJam. I just reviewed the pending Skybook wager; I made the -115 bet at 2:04pm Eastern (LOL, about the same time flacapper posted in this thread).
My post is for MOOT... haha, as it's 9 runs in already at 3-6 in 4th so it's at best a push or a loss.
* CalvinTy
=====
Bet JamaicaPittsburgh Pirates vs. San Diego Padres
Totals
- 09/19/2007 3:41PM: o9 -110 /u9 -110 Opener
- 09/20/2007 11:08AM: o9 -115 / u9 -105
- 09/20/2007 12:37PM: o9 -110 / u9 -110
- 09/20/2007 1:43PM: o9 -105 / u9 -115
I actually have to ask "just where the boundaries are" because stopping a person from making a -115 MLB total wager is also ridiculous, IMHO.
However, I do understand that U8.5 +100 or Under 9 -120 are two essentially different bets. There would be an advantage for an Under 9 -120 bettor to at least push and then not count against the winning percentage.
So, I'm very nosy, grins, where is the line? Looks like you two are on different wavelengths on this.
Disclaimer: I recognized that bet because I had the Pit/SD Under 9 -115 at Skybook as one of my 2 funded book with that best juice at that point at -115, with the other one being BetJam. I just reviewed the pending Skybook wager; I made the -115 bet at 2:04pm Eastern (LOL, about the same time flacapper posted in this thread).
My post is for MOOT... haha, as it's 9 runs in already at 3-6 in 4th so it's at best a push or a loss.
* CalvinTy
ha ha I'm not scared. Just getting it out early. I will get $200 entertainment out of this challenge win or lose.
This one was a riot:
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=458256&highlight=choptalk+poker+challenge
