I swear the GB game looked fixed!!!

RDENBOER · Oct 7, 2007

Maybe I'm just going crazy, but I swear if a game ever looked fixed, it was this one! How does GB mop the field with Chicago in the first half.... then have Favre throw a gimme pic on his own 20 right into the hands of Urlacher... Then call all kinds of conservative plays.... Then play the 2:00 clock at the end of the game with no sense of urgency?

Looked a little odd, to say the least.

Biggamer3 · Oct 7, 2007

Go away

Brett Favre would rather make a few bucks betting than go 5-0 right?

TheRightSide · Oct 7, 2007

another idiot that bet Gb. Yeah Farve never throws ints OMG what is happenning here he has never played like this.

idiot

billhill999 · Oct 7, 2007

Biggamer3 said:
Go away

Brett Favre would rather make a few bucks betting than go 5-0 right?

Thank you !

WharfRat+ · Oct 7, 2007

They don't fix divisional games. Only non-conference games.

Thought everyone knew that.

lifexpired · Oct 8, 2007

WharfRat said:
They don't fix divisional games. Only non-conference games.

Thought everyone knew that.

:lolBIG:

RDENBOER · Oct 8, 2007

How the hell does he just take the short shit and not hurry the team up to the line, or take a play to the sidelines? He walked through that 2-minute drill. He played the whole 2nd half like he didn't care. You don't find that odd?

maruiz85 · Oct 8, 2007

yes yes everytime you lose a bet its for another reason than you picking a loser

as a previous poster stated - why would a hall of fame player with more money than he knows what to do with rig a game?

RDENBOER · Oct 8, 2007

TheRightSide said:
another idiot that bet Gb. Yeah Farve never throws ints OMG what is happenning here he has never played like this.

idiot

Assume what you want, you're the idiot. I won my money on Chicago tonight, but everyone at this party seen the same thing I did. Brett just playing like he didn't care if they won or lost. Maybe it was the play calling from up stairs, who knows. Just seemed fishy is all.

Timetopay · Oct 8, 2007

I dont think it was rigged but I dont remember seeing a slant pass the whole 2nd half that Bears couldnt stop first half

RDENBOER · Oct 8, 2007

maruiz85 said:
yes yes everytime you lose a bet its for another reason than you picking a loser

as a previous poster stated - why would a hall of fame player with more money than he knows what to do with rig a game?

Why are you 2 losers putting words in my mouth? I only said the game looked fixed. Not that Brett fixed it, himself. It could of been play calling, could of been anything. But, explain it for me. Tell me how you justify what you just seen? Just gonna right it off as GB giving up and not playing the 2nd half? What about the 2-minute drill being executed exceptionally horrible?

maruiz85 · Oct 8, 2007

yeah i wondered too - but i'm not in the game..i don't know whats being called what the plan is so im not going to assume anything

i'll agree that it was surprising from Favre

TheRightSide · Oct 8, 2007

RDENBOER said:
Assume what you want, you're the idiot. I won my money on Chicago tonight, but everyone at this party seen the same thing I did. Brett just playing like he didn't care if they won or lost. Maybe it was the play calling from up stairs, who knows. Just seemed fishy is all.

LOL So you hang around with other idiots like yourself.

Favre is old and done.

Why did the Eagles act the same way in the damn Superbowl. Most football players are idiots and need to be controled. Otherwise they would have no clue. I wouldn't let Favre be a waterboy.

RDENBOER · Oct 8, 2007

Timetopay said:
I dont think it was rigged but I dont remember seeing a slant pass the whole 2nd half that Bears couldnt stop first half

One of our exact points..... why wouldn't you run that play during the 2-minute drill... or any other time. Why take dink & dunk passes to your tightend in the middle of the field, and not rush up to the line?

Oh, and why challenge a play that was so close, when you knew your timeouts would be VERY handy minutes later?

blueedwards · Oct 8, 2007

i thought the stl/arz game was fixed too...until they stuck it in during garbage time and got the 2-point conversion for a back-door special.

:dancefool

Timetopay · Oct 8, 2007

I thought the detroit 2nd half over was fixed until the meaningless pick 6 :dancefool

valdosta · Oct 8, 2007

RDENBOER said:
Oh, and why challenge a play that was so close, when you knew your timeouts would be VERY handy minutes later?

Probably because that was a huge play if Chicago don;t get the first down there they had a tough decision. You are really reaching.

BTW- On the replay I don't think he had the first down either.

maruiz85 · Oct 8, 2007

RDENBOER said:
One of our exact points..... why wouldn't you run that play during the 2-minute drill... or any other time. Why take dink & dunk passes to your tightend in the middle of the field, and not rush up to the line?

Oh, and why challenge a play that was so close, when you knew your timeouts would be VERY handy minutes later?

I'd have to guess that Chicago adjusted at half time and took those plays away from Brett -

RDENBOER · Oct 8, 2007

If it was short, who says Chicago doesn't go for it anyways? It was on the 42, not out of the question and a QB sneak gets you 6" that you needed.

I'm not saying it was definitely fixed... just pisspoor playcalling & execution tend to make you wonder sometimes....

Timetopay · Oct 8, 2007

valdosta said:
Probably because that was a huge play if Chicago don;t get the first down there they had a tough decision. You are really reaching.

BTW- On the replay I don't think he had the first down either.

So the refs were in on it.Replay booth was in on it?Favre was in on it?What other players would you think???They really paid off alot of people:lolBIG: