Question on middling with 2 full points differential?

Search

Raising 4 girls!
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
4,514
Tokens
I know I had collected this information somewhere, but can somebody re-post the percentages of whether a NFL game lands on a particular number?

I have a dilemma in where I can see a line at 2 different books for a 4pm game with a FULL 2 point differential and one at -105 juice. However, obviously the number "5" is a rarity so it's more of hitting the 4 *OR* 6 for a push & a win.

Book A; NE -4 -110
Book B; DAL +6 -105


Worth the math?

* CalvinTy
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
I'd do that one, but it's not awesome. I might pass now without NT. I posted it here once ( Ganchrow's data).
 

Rx Wizard
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
11,731
Tokens
I would say it is barely profitbale longterm as 5 is a dead number.

Like someone else said the best move is too take the +6, as that number is best when the consensus line is around 4.5.
 

Raising 4 girls!
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
4,514
Tokens
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I had to go offline to the animal hospital as our cat had been lethargic and had very bad breath; turned out to be a very serious pus infection under his tongue that required immediate surgery & loss of 1/3 of his tongue. Depending on how the tongue recovers, we might have to put him to sleep this week pending the biopsy results.

Back to the thread, I decided to take small equal bets on both sides & not caring if I don't push/win. I felt it was worth it (not because of the dead "5" number, but because I could also PUSH/WIN on *either 4 or 6* which boosts the math "more" into my favor).

* CalvinTy
 

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
204
Tokens
Checking the line history, the "fair" market line at the time this was posted was about ±4½.

Using my half-point calculator, we see that NFL probabilities for a 4, 5, and 6 are about 3.0%, 1.7%, and 3.4% respectively.

Plugging in the prevailing market line of ±4½, we see that the net expected profit from the -4 -110 would be approximately -1.6% and from the +6 -105 would be approximately 4.5%.

To equalize losses on the outside of the middle, for every 1.0000 units bet at -110, one would be 0.9778 units at -105.

Hence ROI would be (-1.6% + 0.9778*4.5%)/1.9778 ≈ 1.42%

And expected return as % of value-at-risk would be (-1.6% + 0.9778*4.5%) / (1-0.9778*100/105) ≈ 40.72%.

Very sorry to hear about your cat, Calvin. We have two ourselves. My sympathies.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,479
Messages
13,451,907
Members
99,416
Latest member
go789click
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com