I also agree with you guys and think they are a top notch team in the NFC (which may not be saying much). I picked them as my most underrated team last week in a thread asking that question.
The problem is they have not covered the last 2 weeks and they have cost me some decent coin:monsters-
The problem is they have not covered the last 2 weeks and they have cost me some decent coin:monsters-
Are you guys serious? Washington barely, and I mean barely hung on against Arizona. Arizona completely dominated Washington, but because Arizona is coached by an ass, Wasington ultimately won the game.
Also, Warner scored all the points for Washington. Washington is a decent team, but they are far from Dallas.
The NFC is really bad, so I can see your thinking on the Washington Train
Also, Warner scored all the points for Washington. Washington is a decent team, but they are far from Dallas.
The NFC is really bad, so I can see your thinking on the Washington Train
They were not completely dominated. The Skins dominated the first <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
ffice:cs:smarttags" /><st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="1">1</st1:NumConv6p0>/<st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="2">2</st1:NumConv6p0>... They were up <st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="14">14</st1:NumConv6p0>-<st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="0">0</st1:NumConv6p0> with on the cards <st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="40">40</st1:NumConv6p0> with under <st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="2">2</st1:NumConv6p0> min to play when a ball was batted into another linemans hands and he ran to the Skins <st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="20">20</st1:NumConv6p0>. It took them a broken ass play on <st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="4">4</st1:NumConv6p0><SUP>th</SUP> down to get a TD to cut the lead to <st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="6">6</st1:NumConv6p0>. The second ½ Gibbs became conservative like he has done all season and allowed the Cards to come back…<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
fficeffice" /><o
> </o>Skins have dominated every first ½ of all games this season. Up <st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="17">17</st1:NumConv6p0>-<st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="3">3</st1:NumConv6p0> on Giants. Up <st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="14">14</st1:NumConv6p0>-<st1:NumConv6p0 sch="1" val="7">7</st1:NumConv6p0> on GB. Both these games ended up as loses b/c Gibbs does not know how to go for the kill or to kick a team when they are down.
<o
> </o>Gibbs second ½ adjustments have sucked and they usually try to hold onto small leads in the second ½ when Gibbs get ultra conservative.
<o
> </o><o
></o>I will take +17 if it ever gets there...
Washington has a chance to compete against anyone in the NFC, but they far from dominated Arizona at any time in that game....just look at the stats and your 14-0 lead was because of two INT's, one for a TD, the other set them up for a TD at the Cards 25. Their offense was horrendous yesterday, Very good defensive team though. I'll take the Giants and CowboysThey were not completely dominated. The Skins dominated the first <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
Skins have dominated every first ½ of all games this season. Up <st1:NumConv6p0 val="17" sch="1">17</st1:NumConv6p0>-<st1:NumConv6p0 val="3" sch="1">3</st1:NumConv6p0> on Giants. Up <st1:NumConv6p0 val="14" sch="1">14</st1:NumConv6p0>-<st1:NumConv6p0 val="7" sch="1">7</st1:NumConv6p0> on GB. Both these games ended up as loses b/c Gibbs does not know how to go for the kill or to kick a team when they are down.
<o
Gibbs second ½ adjustments have sucked and they usually try to hold onto small leads in the second ½ when Gibbs get ultra conservative.
<o
<o
I will take +17 if it ever gets there...
