Weak schedule, stuggle vs. weak teams...blah blah blah....this year, EVERYBODY lost and Hawaii survived....they were tested many times....down 14 on the road (twice), back up QB playing 95% of game, down 21 to a Pac 10 team (not good, but not as bad as their record).....They are barely being considered for a Sugar Bowl bid (last pick)....what is wrong with these ppl.....Utah won, Boise won (and they pretty much dominated 80% of the game before the miracles), and Hawaii undefeated (alone) will barely qualify for this?
who are we talking about?
Ohio St - no one wants them there but they qualify, why not Hawaii?
Georgia - lost to 4 loss team, lost to a .500 team, and didn't even play in title game....wtf??? how the hell can they be above Hawaii???? Hawaii gets shit for their close wins, not only did GA lose twice, they beat vandy by 3....only hawaii gets penalized for close wins.
Kansas - weak schedule....we all know it....didn't play in the title game....how can someone not even champ of their conf. be ahead of the only undefeated team in college football....and a conf champ. (also barely beat Colorado, A&M, KState...but only hawaii gets penalized for close wins)
Virginia Tech - 2 losses (abosultely raped by LSU)....yes, LSU but raped is raped....barely beat E Carolina and UNC...(but only hawaii gets penalized for close wins)
LSU - 2 losses but at least they won their conf (barely)...against better (SEC) teams, but lots of close wins
USC - not sure they are in the convo but lost to stanford....not even gonna continue...
I agree most of these teams (if not all) are probably better than Hawaii, would be favored by over a TD, but the record speaks for itself.....you can't penalize a team for winning every game in this year's college football craziness....they found a way to win when a lot of others couldn't....and they should be rewarded....we look at the 2 OT wins(and probably this one too), but seems like other teams have close wins vs. mediocre teams and NO ONE talks about that when considering others for the BCS NC....
bastards....all bastards....i'm going back in my grass hut to vent.....sorry had to get it off
who are we talking about?
Ohio St - no one wants them there but they qualify, why not Hawaii?
Georgia - lost to 4 loss team, lost to a .500 team, and didn't even play in title game....wtf??? how the hell can they be above Hawaii???? Hawaii gets shit for their close wins, not only did GA lose twice, they beat vandy by 3....only hawaii gets penalized for close wins.
Kansas - weak schedule....we all know it....didn't play in the title game....how can someone not even champ of their conf. be ahead of the only undefeated team in college football....and a conf champ. (also barely beat Colorado, A&M, KState...but only hawaii gets penalized for close wins)
Virginia Tech - 2 losses (abosultely raped by LSU)....yes, LSU but raped is raped....barely beat E Carolina and UNC...(but only hawaii gets penalized for close wins)
LSU - 2 losses but at least they won their conf (barely)...against better (SEC) teams, but lots of close wins
USC - not sure they are in the convo but lost to stanford....not even gonna continue...
I agree most of these teams (if not all) are probably better than Hawaii, would be favored by over a TD, but the record speaks for itself.....you can't penalize a team for winning every game in this year's college football craziness....they found a way to win when a lot of others couldn't....and they should be rewarded....we look at the 2 OT wins(and probably this one too), but seems like other teams have close wins vs. mediocre teams and NO ONE talks about that when considering others for the BCS NC....
bastards....all bastards....i'm going back in my grass hut to vent.....sorry had to get it off