Overtime shouldnt count toward 2nd half totals ...

WorldNumberOne · Dec 31, 2007

You got it figured out perfectly only to have the fucking game go into OT..

Sorry about the under you nailed by 11 points ..

Bullshit rule..

TheWolf · Dec 31, 2007

Agreed.....Im sure somehow the books benefit from this otherwise they wouldnt count it.

Drop2 · Dec 31, 2007

lol, i lose a lot of unders due to overtime. let me guess, u had the orlando/chicago under? me too.

Doug · Dec 31, 2007

You can play quarters then. It's not a conspiracy.

WorldNumberOne · Dec 31, 2007

Doug said:
You can play quarters then. It's not a conspiracy.

i know what my options are.

Duke1 · Dec 31, 2007

OT doesnt benefit the book or the players. For every bad beat you get about going into ot and losing, you also benefit when some games goes into ot as well and you win. Just part of the betting....

Kornholio · Dec 31, 2007

Duke 1 said:
OT doesnt benefit the book or the players. For every bad beat you get about going into ot, you also benefit when the games goes into ot as well. Just part of the betting....

Not if bet primarily unders. OT should not count for anything in any sport for totals, especially college football.

Jadyn · Dec 31, 2007

World Number One said:
You got it figured out perfectly only to have the fucking game go into OT..

Sorry about the under you nailed by 11 points ..

Bullshit rule..

you wouldnt complain if you were on the over. it evens out

WorldNumberOne · Dec 31, 2007

its a terrible rule in my opinion. win or lose...

BEANTOWNJIM · Dec 31, 2007

:finger:MY FIRST UNDER OF THE YEAR IN THE NBA PINNACLE HAD THIS GAME UNDER 197 -134 I GOT 198 SO I THOUGHT I HAD A GOOD BET.BUT OF COURSE THE BULLS TURN THE BALL OVER WITH 42 SECONDS LEFT IF THEY BURN SOME CLOCK WE PROBABLY DONT GO INTO OVERTIME BUT LIKE USUAL THE OVERPAYED JANITORS FIND A WAY TO F-CK ME.

THIS IS WHAT I GET WHEN I BET UNDER :bunnies: 99% OF MY PLAYS ARE OVERS BUT I HAD A 2 POINT EDGE AND I FELL INTO THE OLD PINNACLE TRAP.BOYS IF YOU READ THE PINNACLE LINE MOVES YOU WILL GO BROKE

BEANTOWNJIM · Dec 31, 2007

THIS GAME FELL ON 196 BOTTOM LINE. I GOT 198 I THOUGHT I HAD A GOOD PLAY WHY THE F-CK DID CHICAGO FOUL TO ALLOW ORLANDO TO TIE IT.DID THEY THINK THIS GUY NELSON WOULD MISS ONE OF THE FREE THROWS.I WAS WATCHING IT ON MY COMPUTER SO I DIDNT SEE IF IT WAS INTENTIONAL THINKING NELSON WOULDNT MAKE BOTH FREE THROWS

WorldNumberOne · Dec 31, 2007

my play was the 2nd half under 100.5 .

was golden with 6 minutes left in the 4th.. wasnt going to sniff 100.

got it right and still lost... that blows.

TTinCO · Dec 31, 2007

The Wolf said:
Agreed.....Im sure somehow the books benefit from this otherwise they wouldnt count it.

Naw-the "masses" play mostly overs. In this case, it's actually in their favor.

CHOPTALK · Dec 31, 2007

there are books that dont count OT.

WorldNumberOne · Dec 31, 2007

CHOPTALK said:
there are books that dont count OT.

for 2nd half nba totals ?

name them ...

earl · Dec 31, 2007

World Number One said:
its a terrible rule in my opinion. win or lose...

its simple. know the rules at the book you play at and wager accordingly. no problem.

WorldNumberOne · Dec 31, 2007

no , its this simple.

its a shit rule period.

their is no way that anyone can defend the rule.

earl · Dec 31, 2007

i dont defend rules, i play by them. simple for me. good luck.

Doug · Dec 31, 2007

A creative book could easily offer this, much like NHL can be bet regulation or with OT.

I wouldn't mind the option, but there would need to be demand for it.

How much different would the lines be ?

WorldNumberOne · Dec 31, 2007

thats good... you should keep things as simple as possible.

are their books that dont count ot for 2nd half nba totals that youre not telling us about ?