Assuming Pats vs Pack for SB: Make the Line

ppeter

Rx Wizard

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

5,438

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #1

I makeit NE -10, o/u 52. I know that will be a high total, but the perception will be these are two really good offensive teams, and weather will be perfect down in Arizona.

 

Addict101

New member

Joined

Jun 1, 2006

Messages

7,947

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #2

Ne -10.5 O/u 55

 

ppeter

Rx Wizard

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

5,438

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #3

55? Has there ever been a total that high in an NFL game?

 

VIEJODINOSAUR

Member

Joined

Oct 26, 2003

Messages

26,300

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #4

Not sure but I thought one of the Superbowls with the 49ers was like 57.....not sure..

 

ppeter

Rx Wizard

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

5,438

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #5

If it comes out 55, I will have to plunge the under. 25 handoffs to Ryan Grant should eat up enough clock.

 

Addict101

New member

Joined

Jun 1, 2006

Messages

7,947

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #6

If the total is 51 with the Jags, how could the Packers not present a higher total of at least a field goal?

 

winbet

Rx. Senior

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

7,744

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #7

-10.5 50.5
Although the true line comes in under 10 the Books would have no choice but go -10.5 as for the Total thats 50 and I just wonder how much the Books will want to give considering the percentages but I never seem to get Super bowl betting right. :drink:

 

winbet

Rx. Senior

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

7,744

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #8

Addict101 said:

If the total is 51 with the Jags, how could the Packers not present a higher total of at least a field goal?

Click to expand...

Actually the true lines come out very similar -8 49 compared to -7.5 49.5 :drink:

 

Mr.Smith

RX Senior

Joined

Sep 20, 2000

Messages

8,135

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #9

Patriots minus way too much. Just like every week.

Who the fuck is betting that team and how do they still have any money?

 

lifexpired

New member

Joined

Jul 25, 2006

Messages

2,624

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #10

New England -11'/53

 

Fishhead

Active member

Joined

Oct 20, 1999

Messages

75,444

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #11

Other than having MOSS, how is NE better than GB?

 

krk1030

New member

Joined

Nov 19, 2007

Messages

13,884

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #12

Wasn't the Pats/Colts toal near 60?

 

Mr.Smith

RX Senior

Joined

Sep 20, 2000

Messages

8,135

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #13

they will win though. they are not going to lose. but hmmm, their defense looked awfully a lot like a spaghetti strainer versus the Jaguars

 

winbet

Rx. Senior

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

7,744

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #14

Fishhead said:

Other than having MOSS, how is NE better than GB?

Click to expand...

I think if you look on the Team sheet, They do have Moss. :missingte :drink:

 

Barney44

Always Use Good Money Management

Joined

Sep 15, 2006

Messages

1,171

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #15

line

WILL BE PATS -14 Total Will be 51.5

 

mj23

Member

Joined

Oct 18, 2004

Messages

5,109

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #16

Give me as many points as you can G BAY wins the Super Bowl and the bookies clean the books on the year for the N Eng Pats!!

 

Mr.Smith

RX Senior

Joined

Sep 20, 2000

Messages

8,135

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #17

remember the super bowl where for no apparent reason green bay was -14 over denver?

that was AWESOME. first game I ever made some real money on :toast:

 

JudgeWapner

Member

Joined

Jan 20, 2002

Messages

39,612

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #18

I'll say 11' and 53'.

 

D2bets

New member

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

14,280

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #19

Ne -13/51.5

 

VaultedTreehouse

New member

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

4,000

Tokens

• Jan 13, 2008

• #20

mj 23 said:

Give me as many points as you can G BAY wins the Super Bowl and the bookies clean the books on the year for the N Eng Pats!!

Click to expand...

I agree. I think the Packers will beat them.