Friday bases (97-75 +39.50)

TomorrowsNewspaper · Apr 25, 2008

here we go

Colorado +132 (2 units)
seattle -109 (2 units)
seattle over 9 +109 (2 units)
tampa under 10 -111 (2 units)
san diego under 7 +124 (2 units)

houston +123 (1 unit)
wash +118 (1 unit)

texas -119 (1 unit)
texas -1.5 +160 (1 unit)

cincy -133 (1 unit)
cincy -1.5 +126 (1 unit)

bought back all of my boston bet (other thread) and have a small position on Tampa but no official play.

good luck

spreadbeater · Apr 25, 2008

I like to see you are cutting down on your plays and being more selective. Only 11 plays today. LOL. Best of luck tonight TN, keep up the solid work. I should have an NBA play posted shortly if you are interested. :103631605

TomorrowsNewspaper · Apr 25, 2008

9 really as game and rl are pretty much the same. Also Seattle and over are a tandom play. Really only 7 plays and a couple of small ones. Compare to 14 yesterday though.

Icemantbi · Apr 25, 2008

Thanks for the picks as always Newspaper! BOL tonight!

spreadbeater · Apr 25, 2008

Tomorrow's Newspaper said:
9 really as game and rl are pretty much the same. Also Seattle and over are a tandom play. Really only 7 plays and a couple of small ones. Compare to 14 yesterday though.

Very true. Did not really look at them until now. Good looking card. :toast:

THEOC · Apr 25, 2008

Why the buyback on the Boston game?????

TomorrowsNewspaper · Apr 25, 2008

It was never a play. It was a position on a bad line or a line that should move in my opinion. Really dont like the game much at all.

smartz · Apr 25, 2008

on much of the same

awebayt · Apr 25, 2008

GL :money8:

Doug · Apr 25, 2008

Tomorrow's Newspaper said:
9 really as game and rl are pretty much the same. Also Seattle and over are a tandom play. Really only 7 plays and a couple of small ones. Compare to 14 yesterday though.

Sea and over is a tandem play ?

Why ?

Did you parlay it ?

Mindware · Apr 25, 2008

Doug said:
Sea and over is a tandem play ?

Why ?

Did you parlay it ?

naw man, he does that alot (grouping the side and total, not a parlay) as for sort of an insurance i think. He's hoping to split 1-1 at the very least.

magillagorilla · Apr 25, 2008

great job tn. good luck tonight

zeketaylor · Apr 25, 2008

tremendous value on this rockies line has me questioning how the dodgers can be -140 over anyone with sight. (i mean literally, if they are playing people that arent vision impaired, game should be -125 at worst)

Doug · Apr 25, 2008

Mindware said:
naw man, he does that alot (grouping the side and total, not a parlay) as for sort of an insurance i think. He's hoping to split 1-1 at the very least.

I don't see much relation, Oakland could win 3-2 for example, for two losses.

I'm not trying to bust on TN, but this is two plays.

ML and RL is much more related, and likely to go 2-0, or 0-2.

You can play every game on the board if you want ( and get good lines - Matchbook). I just don't get his logic of it not really being two plays.

halekulani · Apr 25, 2008

if you bet on both -1.5 and ML, aren't you just setting up your own -1 line?

Doug · Apr 25, 2008

yes... if you bet the ML payoff as the RL risk amount.

TomorrowsNewspaper · Apr 25, 2008

Doug said:
I don't see much relation, Oakland could win 3-2 for example, for two losses.

I'm not trying to bust on TN, but this is two plays.

ML and RL is much more related, and likely to go 2-0, or 0-2.

You can play every game on the board if you want ( and get good lines - Matchbook). I just don't get his logic of it not really being two plays.

Sorry for not making this more clear. It is definately 2 wagers. I consider it corralated by my handicapping only. I see Seattle getting to Eveland. The only way I see losing this game is if Oakland outscores them giving me the over. I like playing both because I could see Seattle scoring 10 by themselves.

One reason I dont post analysis is because if this stuff. No offense, just hate to have to explain every thought/reason/play etc. Takes up valualble capping time not to mention game watching time.

good luck

Mindware · Apr 25, 2008

Tomorrow's Newspaper said:
Sorry for not making this more clear. It is definately 2 wagers. I consider it corralated by my handicapping only. I see Seattle getting to Eveland. The only way I see losing this game is if Oakland outscores them giving me the over. I like playing both because I could see Seattle scoring 10 by themselves.

One reason I dont post analysis is because if this stuff. No offense, just hate to have to explain every thought/reason/play etc. Takes up valualble capping time not to mention game watching time.

good luck

3 runs already in the 1st in, but by the wrong team!

TomorrowsNewspaper · Apr 25, 2008

game or total get there I break even. Long game, I got over 6 now. Still see Seattle getting at least 5 off Eveland

$4nothing · Apr 25, 2008

that's mindless.
gloom / doom, no one needs.

Anyone w/o scoreboard ?

plez forgive intrusion, TN.

Friday bases (97-75 +39.50)

New member

NBA and Miami Heat Guru

New member

Member

NBA and Miami Heat Guru

New member

New member

antigravity

throwin dukes

Rx God

New member

New member

Rx. Senior

Rx God

New member

Rx God

New member

New member

New member

Member

Forum statistics

Share this page