but, as you know steak, there is a sharp approach to teasers ... and an incredibly square approach to teasers. and its fair to say that 98% of teaser players fall into the latter approach. so books will always welcome these players with open arms.
similarly, there actually is something to be said for successful anti-public betting. unfortunately, this new trend has created so many squares that think theyre sharp by completely guessing with bogus 'percentages' on every game on the board that true winning contrarians are hard to find. but there are PLENTY of losing contrarians who go to bed at night thinking theyre siding with the books and they are basically giving their money away.
as im sure you would agree, books know there are a small % of winning teaser players out there. just like they know there is a small % of winning contrarians. but they also know that a massive amount of squares who are convinced theyre sharp are just waiting to give them money (along with 10%) every time the lines are posted.
sir -your point is well intentioned but ridiculas at best--- first of all why the fuck would i care what the books love or dont love-- my wagers are placed from my perspective not that of the book! As we all know books love people to be in action period. If we followed your logic no one would ever place a bet:toast:
When you see a book not getting off a line all though the money is lopsided they do this with the teaser action in mind.
Most guy's come on here saying the percentage of plays are on team a but line hasn't moved thinking sharps are betting the other side which may be but I think it is the teaser thing.
Most guy's come on here saying the percentage of plays are on team a but line hasn't moved thinking sharps are betting the other side which may be but I think it is the teaser thing.
