Imo, you could not be more wrong. If you have an edge the more games you play, the less you are effected by the bad beats. If I am going to win 55% of the time I would rather do that on 1000 plays than 100 wouldnt you? The smaller the sample size the more variance. If you are throwing darts, you are better off with less plays.
Just my opinion.
Doug, of those listed I think WOW and myself will end up plus. Bucs tends to ride certain teams (cubs, St louis and now Cincy) and bets alot of -1.5 bets that dont make sense to me. I havent read much of Sherwood this year, but in years past he has proven to know baseball. There are a handful of cappers I expect to do well the second half of this year.
I'm doing well in the H2H league. But its easier to make picks than playing with actual money. You skip playing Peavy @ -180 and take a runline with odds against you. Sports & gambling can be a big waste of time. Most end up losing early on and chase the rest of their life. Unders are the way to go, imo.
I'm not a huge fan of Bucsfan's picks... I think his history suggests a good 1st half, then losing after the break, but he's down 20-25 units now, I think. He doesn't influence me much either way, anymore, kind of a non-factor.
I respect your opinion more than WOW's, but he's worth a look.
I usually decide what I like on the Overnites, try to get a great line at Matchbook, if that fails, bet it at 5D... then consider what others may be thinking, and adjust.
I know Sherwood well, he's having a bad season so far, but he's put me on some great stuff before, he's done like 60-70 units so far, but I think he will finish better than that, maybe not positive, but improve the loss. He has earned my respect.
My point is nobody really seems to be killing it.
