How many get these crazy calls from Touts saying i can put thousands in your pocket every week buy you must pay me 25% or 50% of the winnings. Personally I would like to run a scam like that. The tout has all the upside and no down side. He loses your money and collectes on your winnings. Often I listen to these guys for the information sources and they suck...... No way these guys break 55% plus what you pay them they do well. Anyone in? :nohead:
uke1:
If you can pick 60+ % why not just play them???
When you sell your picks you are hedging the losses.
Win Win, that's why they sell, cause they can't pick well enough to get rich.
Touts work on lazy or unsure people.
Almost everybody loses..........and have losing streaks.
They lose confidence in a hobby that is hard to beat and thus get help.
Increasing their loss because they now pay for them.
Major Stupid!!
When you sell your picks you are hedging the losses.
Win Win, that's why they sell, cause they can't pick well enough to get rich.
Touts work on lazy or unsure people.
Almost everybody loses..........and have losing streaks.
They lose confidence in a hobby that is hard to beat and thus get help.
Increasing their loss because they now pay for them.
Major Stupid!!
A sure sign of a scamdicapper is a claim that he owns a long-term record of making picks against the point spread of 60 percent, 70 percent or higher.
If you’re tempted to believe such nonsense, consider a public challenge just put forth by Fezzik, the one-name professional gambler from Las Vegas.
Fezzik says he is willing to bet anyone up to $100,000 that he or she cannot pick NFL winners against the point spread at a rate of 57 percent or better.
The basis for the person-to-person wager, according to Fezzik, would be the challenger’s performance in next season’s Las Vegas Hilton “SuperContest,” in which entrants select five NFL games a week against the spread for 17 weeks. A record of 49-36 in 85 selections would meet the 57 percent threshold in the contest, which carries a $1,500 entry fee.
“Anyone who claims he has an expectation of hitting 60 percent against widely available (betting) lines going forward is flat-out wrong,” said Fezzik, who estimates 55 percent is the best record that even a pro sports bettor can expect to achieve. “Against certain prop bets, or against overnight lines with small limits, it might be possible, but not in a sport like the NFL.”
The winner of this season’s Hilton contest hit 65 percent. Although that’s a wonderful accomplishment and a $205,200 score for the winner, Fezzik said, it doesn’t prove anything except that in a field of 300-plus contestants, a few can be expected to exceed 60 percent.
Fezzik opted to go public with his challenge not only because he believes he has “the best of it” — meaning he’d be favored to win such a bet — but also to expose as frauds touts who make outrageous claims about their records.
This was OPEN to all comers.......a nobody won!!!
The best of 300 was 65%...........great, but not what the touts scream!
Save your money and pick yourself.....with help from the FREE Rx
If you’re tempted to believe such nonsense, consider a public challenge just put forth by Fezzik, the one-name professional gambler from Las Vegas.
Fezzik says he is willing to bet anyone up to $100,000 that he or she cannot pick NFL winners against the point spread at a rate of 57 percent or better.
The basis for the person-to-person wager, according to Fezzik, would be the challenger’s performance in next season’s Las Vegas Hilton “SuperContest,” in which entrants select five NFL games a week against the spread for 17 weeks. A record of 49-36 in 85 selections would meet the 57 percent threshold in the contest, which carries a $1,500 entry fee.
“Anyone who claims he has an expectation of hitting 60 percent against widely available (betting) lines going forward is flat-out wrong,” said Fezzik, who estimates 55 percent is the best record that even a pro sports bettor can expect to achieve. “Against certain prop bets, or against overnight lines with small limits, it might be possible, but not in a sport like the NFL.”
The winner of this season’s Hilton contest hit 65 percent. Although that’s a wonderful accomplishment and a $205,200 score for the winner, Fezzik said, it doesn’t prove anything except that in a field of 300-plus contestants, a few can be expected to exceed 60 percent.
Fezzik opted to go public with his challenge not only because he believes he has “the best of it” — meaning he’d be favored to win such a bet — but also to expose as frauds touts who make outrageous claims about their records.
This was OPEN to all comers.......a nobody won!!!
The best of 300 was 65%...........great, but not what the touts scream!
Save your money and pick yourself.....with help from the FREE Rx
