Creditwagering.com favorites r a joke....

MONDOGECKO · Aug 19, 2008

Mets -240
Brewers -275
Cubs -330
D-backs -220
Red Sox - 200
White Sox -130

These lines are way over inflated, Im guessing a lot of Joe Public is making wagers at this site.

Sportsrmylife · Aug 19, 2008

then its dogs baby!

smalls4411 · Aug 19, 2008

That's why cw can afford their concept

King83 · Aug 19, 2008

i know...cant even play the favs...RL maybe

MONDOGECKO · Aug 19, 2008

Pretty much, if ur not betting dogs, then find a new site.

MONDOGECKO · Aug 19, 2008

I love king felix +110 against clayton Richard. Thats some nice value, Clayton Rich shud never be -130 against the king.

DBCooper · Aug 19, 2008

yes me too

I got tip on the mariners as well

potomac52 · Aug 19, 2008

there run lines are also high

BaldEagle · Aug 19, 2008

Considering they probably get stiffed by 15-20% of their customers who lose I would say I am nto surpised. As soon as I can move to a real site I will.

Of course the flip side is getting paid from the regular sites is kind of tough if you live in the US, and creditwagering seems to have no issues in that regard.

DancesWSheep · Aug 20, 2008

BaldEagle said:
Considering they probably get stiffed by 15-20% of their customers who lose I would say I am nto surpised. As soon as I can move to a real site I will.

Of course the flip side is getting paid from the regular sites is kind of tough if you live in the US, and creditwagering seems to have no issues in that regard.

An article on About's Sports Gambling site has CW.com saying that 20% of sports bettors are trustworthy, which would mean they get stiffed by about 80% of their losers. Makes you ashamed of your fellow sports bettors.