In my history on this site, I don't think I've once posted/made a play based off of a "trend."
I use statistical analysis to make an educated prediction of what's going to happen (aka handicapping).
Saying the Angels are going to win simply because you're a fan of that team is the reason why nobody on this site likes you. At least Jordan can admit he's a Homer.
I use statistical analysis to make an educated prediction of what's going to happen (aka handicapping).
Saying the Angels are going to win simply because you're a fan of that team is the reason why nobody on this site likes you. At least Jordan can admit he's a Homer.
It's not really a trend. Just pointing out that the Red Sox seem to never lose wth Lester starting at home. I have been betting him at home every start since the 2nd half and no reason to stop tonight.
A trend is something like this umpire has 20 overs in his last 25 games or the road team is 8-0 in the last 8 meetings when they haven't faced each other in a couple of years.
Didn't at all mean to "throw you under the bus" if that's how it came off.
That Lester statistic is an incredible one and I may end up tailing you on my Sox. Thanks for the info.
In bold is what I despise:
"Since 1992 the Red Sox have not lost to the Angels in October during night games with the temperature above 70 degrees"
First of all, what the fuck do the '92 Sox have anything to do with this 2008 group? The answer is absolutely nothing.
Basically put, I just hate that kind of analysis and it seems 5-0 SAT lives and dies by it; hopefully the latter happens to him tonight.
Best of luck with your play and go Sox!
hno:
