How is this possibile?
Their system is suppose to spit out the best team in CFB, it tells us that team is Alabama, clear cut with no if's and's or but's and on a neutral site this same team is an 10 point dog this week. WHAT?
Alabama has went undefeated so they "earned" it most would say but this sures makes the Utah would get crushed argument not stand up, when using the pointspread as a measuring stick (which everybody knows is the best indicator of who the best team is as it is basically teams voted on thru money on how strong teams are).
How do you draw the line? You are saying that Alabama is good enough because they havent lost a game but Utah, Ball St, etc dont get that same oppurtunity. Everyone is saying that Alabama would lose by double digits in a game versus Florida but now this week, Alabama can "prove" this wrong but teams like Utah and the others dont get a chance to prove it becasue we have already assumed they would get whipped.
In fact if this was a Big Ten team they wouldnt have to play this type of conference championship game this week and they would already be in the championship game and god knows how huge of a dog they would be going into that game and we as fans would have been "stuck" with that crap scenairo again but fortunatley that was avoided this year.
The pointspread tells us flat out who the better team is, we all know that. Oh wait that is crap you are saying, that isnt always true, that sometimes the better team is the dog and that is proven every week in sports. That you cant let people decide who the better team is and that you play the game on the field and then see who the best team is. EXACTLY and this is why you cant vote who the 2 best teams are as you cant get it right.
A playoff guarantess the 2 best teams would play each other in the final game to determine the championship because they would prove that by winning the game on the field.
Their system is suppose to spit out the best team in CFB, it tells us that team is Alabama, clear cut with no if's and's or but's and on a neutral site this same team is an 10 point dog this week. WHAT?
Alabama has went undefeated so they "earned" it most would say but this sures makes the Utah would get crushed argument not stand up, when using the pointspread as a measuring stick (which everybody knows is the best indicator of who the best team is as it is basically teams voted on thru money on how strong teams are).
How do you draw the line? You are saying that Alabama is good enough because they havent lost a game but Utah, Ball St, etc dont get that same oppurtunity. Everyone is saying that Alabama would lose by double digits in a game versus Florida but now this week, Alabama can "prove" this wrong but teams like Utah and the others dont get a chance to prove it becasue we have already assumed they would get whipped.
In fact if this was a Big Ten team they wouldnt have to play this type of conference championship game this week and they would already be in the championship game and god knows how huge of a dog they would be going into that game and we as fans would have been "stuck" with that crap scenairo again but fortunatley that was avoided this year.
The pointspread tells us flat out who the better team is, we all know that. Oh wait that is crap you are saying, that isnt always true, that sometimes the better team is the dog and that is proven every week in sports. That you cant let people decide who the better team is and that you play the game on the field and then see who the best team is. EXACTLY and this is why you cant vote who the 2 best teams are as you cant get it right.
A playoff guarantess the 2 best teams would play each other in the final game to determine the championship because they would prove that by winning the game on the field.
