Yes, another question about the last fumble/incomplete pass

Search

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
if they did review it and change it to an incomplete pass:

1) the clock would have more time right? (soon as ball hit ground, not when recovered)

2) what happens with the 15 yd unsportsmanlike? my friend I was watching the game said it would be wiped out since the play ended....but that doesn't make sense....whats done is done right?

if things make sense (they never do), AZ would've had the ball on the 29/30 yard line with like 10 seconds left?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
Ball hit ground with 8 seconds left and the penalty would have counted making it 1st and 10 from the 29 with 8 seconds. They might have even had 2 shots for the endzone.

Warner did mess up on the previous play running around too much and wasting too much time. He should have just thrown it away when he had nothing.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
568
Tokens
I would of loved to see the cardinals at least get a shot at the end zone. whether it was intercepted incomplete or a td. any of them would of been better than the game ending like the way it did on such a controversial call. even if there was no 15 yard penalty and a 50 yard bomb, jump ball in the endzone was the last play. anything besides how it turned out
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,689
Messages
13,453,439
Members
99,428
Latest member
callgirls
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com