A-Rod leak might have been a crime

Search
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
SAN FRANCISCO – The judge in the Barry Bonds perjury case could find BALCO prosecutors, investigators or officials in contempt if evidence connects them to the leak of formerly anonymous 2003 Major League baseball drug tests that resulted in allegations that Alex Rodriguez took steroids.
A source familiar with the proceedings between the government and MLB players union said, “It is not possible this was leaked without there being a violation of the law.”
Two former prosecutors said it was likely that Judge Susan Illston, who is presiding over the Bonds case, would order contempt hearings. The Rodriguez disclosure is especially serious because Illston and other federal judges had ruled that this was “information [the government] wasn’t entitled to,” said Charles La Bella, a former U.S. Attorney who practices criminal defense in San Diego. “It’s unfair to tarnish an individual based on that illegally seized information.”

On Saturday, Sports Illustrated cited “two sources familiar with the evidence that the government has gathered” in the BALCO investigation and “two other sources with knowledge of the testing results” in reporting that Rodriguez tested positive for the steroid Primobolan and testosterone.
The records pertaining to Rodriguez and others are part of a case involving Comprehensive Drug Testing (CDT), the Long Beach, Calif., lab that performed much of MLB’s testing in 2003 and was subject to a government raid in April 2004. The case has several links to the Bonds case and to the seven-year probe into the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative (BALCO).
Among the evidence against Bonds is a positive drug re-test that originated from urine samples taken during MLB’s survey testing in 2003, the same tests that allegedly produced Rodriguez’s positive result.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_y...B?slug=li-arodlegal020909&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
 

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
5,936
Tokens
Of course its a crime, the leaker revealed confidential information, if it wasnt a crime than it would have been a named source.

Looks like the SI writer will either have to give up the sources or go to jail, this should be no different than the SF Chronicle case
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
Of course its a crime, the leaker revealed confidential information, if it wasnt a crime than it would have been a named source.

Looks like the SI writer will either have to give up the sources or go to jail, this should be no different than the SF Chronicle case


You're Right, But Will he Tell :think2:
 

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
5,936
Tokens
You're Right, But Will he Tell :think2:
Unless he wants to find a new profession he wont tell and he will become a current day Rosa Parks, standing up to the law or whatever for the betterment of the people. :ohno:
 

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
15,479
Tokens
i was thinking that 'SI' was going to be releasing a new name from the 100+ left on that list...

on a weekly basis...

for added effect.

:>(
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,591
Messages
13,452,736
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com