two tonight with analysis

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
HOME TEAM IN CAPS
All games are listed pitchers unless stated otherwise.



Pittsburgh +1.04 over WASHINGTON

The Nats are scoring a ton of runs and in fact have scored five runs or more an eye-opening eight games in a row now. Its record over that span is a sickening 1-7 and that’s because nobody can get anybody out. How frustrating this must be for the hitters. Now, in the midst of a 1-7 streak they’re asking a Double-A pitcher with average Double-A numbers to step in and do the job. Talk about throwing fuel into a fire. Lefthander Ross Detwiler will make his major-league debut and although he does have upside, this is not a good situation for him. The kid has allowed 140 hits in 124 minor-league innings at A-ball and Double-AA ball over the past two years and his minor league career ERA is 4.86. He also had a problem throwing strikes and that has delayed his progress. He’s rectified that somewhat but nerves could definitely cause that wildness to return. Russ Ohlendorf is getting better with each start and has five quality starts in seven games this year. He’s pitched six full innings or more in all but one of his starts and he’s coming off a six-inning, two hitter against the Cards. In three May starts the league is hitting just .227 off him and he’s inducing more and more ground balls, which is also a great sign. It’s also worth noting that Ejijah Dukes is on the rack and right now the Nats can’t afford any injuries. Pirates plus anything here has to be considered some decent value and I also like them against southpaws. Play Pittsburgh +1.04 (Risking 2 units). <o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
NY Mets +1.35 over LOS ANGELES <o:p></o:p>
The Mets are almost always worth some consideration at a price because they can score runs with the best of them and they’re even more lethal against lefties. They’ll face one here in Randy Wolf and although Wolf has put up some terrific numbers this year, his career numbers suggest he’s going to serve it up any time now. It’s seldom good strategy to wager on a guy whose stock is at its highest and that’s precisely the situation with Wolf. In nine previous years his ERA was under four just twice and that came way back in ’01 and ’02. He’s usually up around the 4.50 range so if history is any indication of how he’ll perform, it’s very likely he’ll get lit up very soon. Wolf is just not good enough to keep dominating. Tim Redding will make his season debut and although he’s a fourth or fifth starter he can keep the Mets in games and let the offense do the rest. If the better starter won every game we’d all be rich but they don’t and that’s why the Mets are a live pooch. They can outscore anyone and just might be the best team in the majors. Play: NY Mets +1.35 (Risking 2 units). <o:p></o:p>
 

New member
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
370
Tokens
What do you think about parlaying Pittsburgh +1.04 with over 10....I think the Pirates are going to score in bunches tonight.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
BB:
I'm not a total player at all but I wouldn't go over in Washington games right now because the numbers are inflated right now because of all the high scoring games they've been involved in. In other words, you're paying a premium to go over in Washington games. Personally, I'd be looking at unders in Nats games.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
Yeah, I do, most games last year in Washington were 8 or 8.5. I know their offense is so much better this year but no way do they keep scoring runs like they have been at this park. Rarely outside of games in Colorado do you see a Pitt total this high.

Of course it could go over but I'm just saying that you're paying a premium to go over in Washington games right now.
 

Dynasty
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
13,234
Tokens
surprised i thought i would see you on the Nats. I know you were very high on them to start the season, so with their poor start I see some value in their lines, especially against a horrible offense such as the Pirates. Have you changed your stance on the Nats since the start of the season?

BOL tonight
 

New member
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
123
Tokens
I think weighting your bets witha parlay would be the smartest route to take in this situation. Whichever you like more put more on...example:

100 on pitt
50 on pitt over
50 parlay of the two

This way if pitt wins ur breaking even. I like both bets, but if ur skeptical just hedge it like I showed. Let me know what you think. Personally, I do not like hedging like this because that means I am not too confident but it has worked out a lot of the times I have done it.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
7,018
Tokens
RFK was an under park.

This park seems to be a launching pad,or is that their pitching staff.........LOL
 

Don't assume people in charge know what they are d
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
6,476
Tokens
Nice Pitt pick.
I added a TT thanxs to the write


Mutts gotts come back, they have the sticks.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,541
Messages
13,452,462
Members
99,422
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com