adding:
OAK A's @ NY Yankees
Yankees RL (-132) 2*
if i cant catch oakland then i will fade them, i gave them a chance in first two games of this series but yankees are at another level. U cant expect to win a game when ur sending Gonzalez 9+ ERA against a redhot offense that won 8 in a row. Also yankees won 8 straight against athletics. Pettitte is 0-2 last 3 and this is the perfect moment for a bounce back. Look for the sweep today.
OAK A's @ NY Yankees
Yankees RL (-132) 2*
if i cant catch oakland then i will fade them, i gave them a chance in first two games of this series but yankees are at another level. U cant expect to win a game when ur sending Gonzalez 9+ ERA against a redhot offense that won 8 in a row. Also yankees won 8 straight against athletics. Pettitte is 0-2 last 3 and this is the perfect moment for a bounce back. Look for the sweep today.
I have only paid attention to your threads the last couple of days but am I right in the observation that all your ML-bets are 2* and all the RL-bets 0.5?
This since one would get the impression, looking at the +32.52 vs +4.60, you are much better in the ML-bets. If adjusted though for the 2/0.5 and the total amount of bets per type the conclusion on the other hand simply is that there is as of yet no significant difference in which you are better.
Keep up the good work in either way though!
This since one would get the impression, looking at the +32.52 vs +4.60, you are much better in the ML-bets. If adjusted though for the 2/0.5 and the total amount of bets per type the conclusion on the other hand simply is that there is as of yet no significant difference in which you are better.
Keep up the good work in either way though!
