Which NFL City Is Next In Line To Lose It's Team & Which Deserves A Shot At A Team?

Search

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
It could be soon or it may be a while, but which city do you will lose their NFL team next, and which city do you think deserves to have a team for the first time or a second shot?
 

New member
Joined
Dec 27, 2004
Messages
2,220
Tokens
I don't know if it will be next but I have a feeling Toronto will be in pretty soon. A big city with a very large market, would instantly become one of the bigger markets in the NFL outside of New York. A stadium and plenty of fan interest already in place... kind of a no brainer really.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
I think that without a doubt, San Diego's franchise will be moved to Los Angeles. The NFL is dying to get a club back there and San Diego is going to be the natural choice.
 

Pop-culture, entertainment, sports and contest Mod
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
33,977
Tokens
it seems crazy to me that LA doesnt have a team....i know they had em before and sometimes struggled, but its just amazing the way they support the lakers and dodgers, and even the clippers, that they wouldnt be able to fill an NFL stadium..
 

Rx Local
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
6,133
Tokens
Minnesota Vikings lease at metrodome ends after the 2011 season and they have been turn down the last few years when asking for state help to fund a new one. So they could be the looking for a new home in 2012 where many say LA
 

Where Taconite Is Just A Low Grade Ore
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
8,490
Tokens
If Itzy Or Bitzy Or Whatever The F His Name Is

Doesn't get the new stadium he's pushing for, it would not surprise me to see him move the "Purple"!!
 
Last edited:

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2000
Messages
9,100
Tokens
Buffalo will without a doubt end up in Toronto. A shame because these fans sell out pretty much every game but I think the move is coming.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Boise needs a team.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
We'll even take the Lions.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,788
Tokens
http://m.espn.go.com/wireless/story?storyId=8212554&city=losangeles


Stephen Jones: LA is a 'top priority'
Arash Markazi [ARCHIVE]

ESPNLosAngeles.com | July 29, 2012
OXNARD, Calif. -- As the Dallas Cowboys prepared to open training camp in Oxnard, Calif., a coastal city 60 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles, Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones said getting an NFL team into the second-biggest market in the country is now one of the league's top priorities.

"It's obviously a top priority for our league and our membership to get a team in Los Angeles," Jones said Sunday. "We just sent out some things to member clubs if any of them have an interest in (relocating) or can show they should be considered, we're going to have guidelines for that. It's a top priority for us. I think we have a lot of diligence to do still in terms of what's going to be the best site for our future club in Los Angeles, but it's certainly a priority and something we feel like is really going to heat up here over the next 12 months."

“ One of the requirements we're going to have when we do build a stadium in L.A. as a league and as a team is that it has got to be able to house two teams, just like the stadium in New York, so that we do have that option in the future. It's a top priority and it's something everybody is putting a lot of hard work into. ” -- Cowboys executive Stephen Jones, on two NFL teams potentially relocating to LA

Jones, who is on the NFL's stadium committee and has been closely monitoring the ongoing developments in Los Angeles, said he would be surprised if there wasn't an NFL team in Los Angeles by 2014, the 20th anniversary of the last time the NFL was in the city before the Raiders and Rams left for Oakland and St. Louis, respectively, before the 1995 season.

"I would be surprised," Jones said. "I think the league is really heating it up. I think we're putting some good processes in place as to how teams would want to be considered for Los Angeles and that would want to move. That's obviously very sensitive when they're playing in their markets right now and have a fan base. Everybody has to be sensitive to that, but at the same time the processes are in place where the team can come to the league quietly and say, 'Look, here's our situation in our current market. It's not working great when you compare our situation to 29 or 30 other teams.' So we're going to put something in place where we look at that."

Last month, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell sent a memo to all 32 organizations that said no single team has any "presumptive right" to play in Los Angeles and that only the league can make a decision on relocation. Any franchise interested in relocating to Los Angeles for the 2013 season, Goodell said, must apply between Jan. 1 and Feb. 15 of that year, and prove it has exhausted all attempts to remain in its current location.

There are currently two proposed stadium sites for a future NFL team in Los Angeles.

Farmers Field, a proposed stadium in downtown Los Angeles by Anschutz Entertainment Group, already has submitted an environmental impact report, the final hurdle before construction can begin. If everything goes according to plan, it could be in position to push dirt by March 2013.

A competing stadium proposed by real estate magnate Ed Roski in the City of Industry has been "shovel ready" since 2009.

Both stadiums, however, need a long-term commitment from a team before construction can begin. And if construction does begin, it could take up to four years to complete.

"I don't think at this time we have a preference," Jones said of the competing proposals. "Obviously we have to take a long, hard look at the business and what it means to move to L.A. and what the stadium situation is going to be."

If construction begins in March 2013, the earliest the stadium could open is September 2017. In the meantime, the NFL team that relocates to Los Angeles would play in either the L.A. Coliseum or the Rose Bowl.

Jones said when a team finally does move to Los Angeles, a second team might not be far behind.

"I wouldn't rule out more than one team being in Los Angeles," Jones said. "I don't know if it will happen together. One of the requirements we're going to have when we do build a stadium in L.A. as a league and as a team is that it has got to be able to house two teams, just like the stadium in New York, so that we do have that option in the future. It's a top priority and it's something everybody is putting a lot of hard work into. As you can imagine, 32 teams own that market, it's obviously a great market, but there's a lot of economics when you get into building a stadium and the right to move to Los Angeles. There's a lot of moving parts."

Since 2001, the Cowboys have held at least a portion of their training camp in Oxnard seven times. From 1963-89, they held their training camp in Thousand Oaks, Calif., which is 45 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles.

Jones said even if the NFL returns to Los Angeles, the Cowboys still would be open to holding training camp in Southern California.

"We practiced here when there were teams out here," Jones said. "We obviously enjoy camp out here, but we're always open-minded to anything. We certainly want to be respectful when teams do move here, so we're open-minded to working with the NFL and whoever might move into Los Angeles. But we think it's fabulous out here. That's why we keep coming back."

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, who was born in El Segundo, Calif., a city in Los Angeles County located on the Santa Monica Bay, smiled when asked about the NFL potentially returning to his birthplace.

"I'm personally a favorite son of El Segundo, I was born in El Segundo," Jerry Jones said. "I have about 30 cousins out here who live in California, and we're ready to get a team in Los Angeles."
 

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
2,776
Tokens
Look for the Rams to "go home again." Ownership is using the stadium issue to get out of town. Believe it or not, they want to "rennovate" the current stadium and the plans call for just about a total demolision. Taxpayers and the local government, needless to say, thankfully are not on board and it is one of those situations where neither side seems ready to budge. There really is no tradition in STL and no last minute knight in shining armor to ride in to swoop up the team since the economy is so bad. I think Minneapolis and the Twin Cities can find a way to kee the Vikings as they do have tradtion going for them plus the area is not so economically depressed. Maybe the new team in LA will be called....The Rams.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
17,706
Tokens
I think Minnesota is the next to go unless something has changed, dont really keep up with it.... Buffalo to Toronto makes sense too... Although Buffalo fans are great and passionate, would feel sorry for them.

LA should have a team, its 3 million people.... However, I think Hampton Roads (virginia beach, norfolk, ect) should be in consideration.... Although they are independant cities they are all on top each other, it should be one major city. The have 1.6 million people, which would be the 4th largest city in the US....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
LA really doesn't want a team! People have too many other things to do in the sun!
 

Rx Local
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
6,133
Tokens
I think Minnesota is the next to go unless something has changed, dont really keep up with it.... Buffalo to Toronto makes sense too... Although Buffalo fans are great and passionate, would feel sorry for them.

LA should have a team, its 3 million people.... However, I think Hampton Roads (virginia beach, norfolk, ect) should be in consideration.... Although they are independant cities they are all on top each other, it should be one major city. The have 1.6 million people, which would be the 4th largest city in the US....

The Vikings are getting a new stadium the bill passed in May they have a new 30 year lease so it wont be the Vikings moving.

http://www.vikings.com/media-vault/...-Stadium/e6005588-3ca4-437e-b2b6-b7463390dca5

newfront.jpg
 

Member
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
31,627
Tokens
how could a city support their team more than buffalo does?
the league may want a team in La, but the people could care less
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,362
Tokens
It's the dumbest thing in sports to not have a team in L.A. The fans supported the Rams and the Raiders when they were there. It's just that a whore moved the Rams and a certified wacko moved the Raiders. Don't blame the good fans of Southern California for those two nutcases.
 

New member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
6,559
Tokens
Portland could support a team - but it won´t ever happen. They support the Blazers, who while not the worst on-court team, are probably the worst organization in the NBA. They also support the Timbers (MLS) rabidly, and they are just atrocious. They´d never get a stadium built though.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,223
Messages
13,449,720
Members
99,402
Latest member
jb52197
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com