MLB Play-off System

straightcashhomie · Oct 7, 2009

To those who are interested. This system proves to make profit every season. Quite simply, play all dogs blindly every night on the ML and reverse runline. I will guarantee come the World Series you will be up money.

Best of Luck.

- SCH

bystander · Oct 7, 2009

i agree, but just skip the yanks series, at least this series against twins......

incomeraise · Oct 7, 2009

ok so when u talking about the reverse line u meaan the dogs +1.5 right?
has it work the previous years? i might do that

Drunkn247 · Oct 7, 2009

Think he means dog -1.5

Like Twins -1.5 +525
Twins +320

Dodgers +120 or so
Dodgers -1.5 +230

incomeraise · Oct 7, 2009

oh yeah thats what i thought he meant as well. well i hope it really pays off because i am bout to start it tonight.
So i guess LA angels it s tonight. i am not sure about the twins tho.. can they really pull that against the yankees?? hmmmm not sure

ivan722 · Oct 7, 2009

straightcashhomie said:
To those who are interested. This system proves to make profit every season. Quite simply, play all dogs blindly every night on the ML and reverse runline. I will guarantee come the World Series you will be up money.

Best of Luck.

- SCH

Any chance you can clarify betting the reverse runline for the puppy as two gents inquired below?

(So may people have a habit of offering a system or whatever and then fail to respond to questions offered by those seeking answers.)

serif · Oct 7, 2009

ivan722 said:
Any chance you can clarify betting the reverse runline for the puppy as two gents inquired below?

(So may people have a habit of offering a system or whatever and then fail to respond to questions offered by those seeking answers.)

If I may give it a whirl for anyone who can't find the bucket of elbow grease on the 3rd shelf to the top in the closet in the back

Reverse Runline = The ML dog is automatically +1.5 / -xyz
So if your book (or local) offers it take the ML dog
to win by 2 meaning ML dog **-1.5 / +xyz** for the
extra payout because they are dog. The bigger the
dog the bigger payout respectively..........

Same for the pucks too.....
If done right - can be profitable........

krh7 · Oct 7, 2009

sounds interesting...especially with wild card teams winning the world series the last few years.

anybody have net results from the last few seasons???

straightcashhomie · Oct 8, 2009

ivan722 said:
Any chance you can clarify betting the reverse runline for the puppy as two gents inquired below?

(So may people have a habit of offering a system or whatever and then fail to respond to questions offered by those seeking answers.)

Reverse Runline aka Alternate runline would be taking the dog -1.5 rather than the favourite -1.5.

I wish I had stats from previous years to share with the forum, however I dont.

Remember to stick with it. It will pay off in the end.

BOL

- SCH

straightcashhomie · Oct 8, 2009

Would someone care to track this?

JoshHamilton · Oct 8, 2009

I read this and decided to backtrack it a bit for you, not very far, just the past two playoffs. Hope it helps though. These results are based off the CLOSING lines at Pinnacle. Every bet is 1 unit to win ? units, with each wager being 100$ these would be your results.

2008:
Betting every underdog: 16-14 +568 (5.68 units)
Betting every underdog (reverse line, -1.5): 14-16 +?
(what I expect to be +900 or so, or 9 units)

*One game had neither team as underdog, counted it as no bet.
Home team won that game 8-5.*

2007:
Betting every underdog: 10-16 -256, or -2.56 units
Betting every underdog (reverse line, -1.5): 9-17 +?
(guessing around even)

*Two games had neither team as underdog, counted them as no bets. The road team won 9-2 in the first, the home team won 7-3 in the second.*

IN THE FINAL SEVEN GAMES OF 2007 PLAYOFFS, THE FAVORITE WON ALL 7 GAMES. In the final 7 games of 2008 the favorite won three of the games.

straightcashhomie · Oct 8, 2009

Thanks Josh.

JoshHamilton · Oct 8, 2009

no problem bud. wanted to check some pass results before people go blindly throwing money down on a system.

GL

antifoil · Oct 8, 2009

i did this today but modified it based on pitching matchups.

i thought cook and hamels were about even (not a big fan of hamels this year) and same on the sox/angels game.

but i couldnt pull the trigger against wainwright.

straightcashhomie · Oct 8, 2009

antifoil said:
i did this today but modified it based on pitching matchups.

i thought cook and hamels were about even (not a big fan of hamels this year) and same on the sox/angels game.

but i couldnt pull the trigger against wainwright.

GL Bro, I had those same feelings last night against the Yanks, however did pull the trigger and lost. I find the problem with some system plays is you almost have to go all in.

If I were to go against one game tonight that would probably be it.

BOL

- SCH

incomeraise · Oct 9, 2009

Josh Hamilton said:
I read this and decided to backtrack it a bit for you, not very far, just the past two playoffs. Hope it helps though. These results are based off the CLOSING lines at Pinnacle. Every bet is 1 unit to win ? units, with each wager being 100$ these would be your results.

2008:
Betting every underdog: 16-14 +568 (5.68 units)
Betting every underdog (reverse line, -1.5): 14-16 +?
(what I expect to be +900 or so, or 9 units)

*One game had neither team as underdog, counted it as no bet.
Home team won that game 8-5.*

2007:
Betting every underdog: 10-16 -256, or -2.56 units
Betting every underdog (reverse line, -1.5): 9-17 +?
(guessing around even)

*Two games had neither team as underdog, counted them as no bets. The road team won 9-2 in the first, the home team won 7-3 in the second.*

IN THE FINAL SEVEN GAMES OF 2007 PLAYOFFS, THE FAVORITE WON ALL 7 GAMES. In the final 7 games of 2008 the favorite won three of the games.

actually it had positive record for both 2007 and 2008 . 2006 was positive as well.
U can track it on wagerline website and assume that the reverse line is always at least +200 or on an average!!

but yeah it was good profit i think

JoshHamilton · Oct 9, 2009

I think it barely profited in 2007. My numbers are correct, I have backtracked bud.

straightcashhomie · Oct 9, 2009

All good boys. Good night last night, lets keep it alive.

All Dogs go to heaven! lol..

BOL!

- SCH

incomeraise · Oct 9, 2009

Josh Hamilton said:
I think it barely profited in 2007. My numbers are correct, I have backtracked bud.

lol so then i guess one of us must be wrong bud, because I have backtracked it as well and it came out as a profit ...really weird i must say,

RealRJ · Oct 9, 2009

This system works year in and year out!

Place 1 unit on each dog ML.
Place .5 unit on alternate RL.(Underdog -1.5)
Place .25 unit on Underdog -2.5(If you can find this)

As far as tweaking goes, you have to ride the system out as Straightcash has mentioned. You must believe in the system as the results don't lie. If you start bypassing games then you aren't following the system and your results will suffer.

Now having said that, over the past 5 years I have added my own tweak which has saved me cash. It seems like every year or so a pitcher emerges and just dominates. I usually wait till their 3rd start or so and then just lay off. ie. Beckett 2-3 years ago and Hamels last year.

Do I think Minny will win tonight? No, but I gotta do what I gotta do. If you like to pick your spots, put your research in and have great control on your # of bets then all the power to you. I have found this system to work in my favor and saves a lot of time with great results. Another bonus for all you action junkies out there is you are involved in every game!

Best of luck!