DONKEYKONG SECOND HALF WINNER on MNF

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

At this pace, my guess on the second half line will be...

eagles -1 20.5

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

Went 3-1 my last 4 second half plays. I have a knack for these winners. So if you are down, and want to break even or make some extra dough, stay tuned for this EASY EASY second half winner......

:howdy::howdy::howdy: see u in a few....

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

At this pace, my guess on the second half line will be...

eagles -1 20.5

skywalker95 · Oct 26, 2009

could use a 2nd half winner, my under isn't looking so hot right now.

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

skywalker95 said:
could use a 2nd half winner, my under isn't looking so hot right now.

hang in there skywalker....will bail you out like the US govt bailed out the banks.......d1g1td1g1td1g1t

skywalker95 · Oct 26, 2009

donkeykong said:
hang in there skywalker....will bail you out like the US govt bailed out the banks.......d1g1td1g1td1g1t

you mean I'm going to be rewarded for sucking? what a concept... jokes, but thanks just trying to get some idea what the people here are thinking for the 2nd half

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

dont care what others are thinking my friend....all that matters is what donkeykong plays cause what he plays usually wins. no joke.

just here to help those that need it. for your info, never bet an UNDER in a MNF game....that is just a general rule i go by.

skywalker95 · Oct 26, 2009

donkeykong said:
dont care what others are thinking my friend....all that matters is what donkeykong plays cause what he plays usually wins. no joke.

just here to help those that need it. for your info, never bet an UNDER in a MNF game....that is just a general rule i go by.

ya I know but I was looking at the 37, figured Philly could pop 27-30 easy, but I sort of expected Philly to spread their points out not have em all come in the first half. and really didn't think the Redskins were capable of anything more than 7 points. And I got the line at 39 (-120) so I thought there was value.

anyway, I'm goin all in with your 2nd half bet like Goldman Sachs trailing AIG money...

skywalker95 · Oct 26, 2009

<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="780"><tbody><tr bgcolor="#f8f5bd"><td nowrap="nowrap">437</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Philadelphia Eagles</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><input id="editx" name="S1_0" class="inputstyle" size="4" maxlength="5"> pk -125 </td><td nowrap="nowrap"> </td><td nowrap="nowrap"><input id="editx" name="L1_0" class="inputstyle" size="4" maxlength="5"> Over 17 -115 </td></tr><tr bgcolor="#f8f5bd"><td nowrap="nowrap">438</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Washington Redskins</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><input id="editx" name="S2_0" class="inputstyle" size="4" maxlength="5"> pk +105 </td><td nowrap="nowrap"> </td><td nowrap="nowrap"><input id="editx" name="L2_0" class="inputstyle" size="4" maxlength="5"> Under 17 -105 </td></tr></tbody></table>
what's the play donkeykong? juice going up fast on the Philly pick...

Kiln · Oct 26, 2009

donkeykong said:
for your info, never bet an UNDER in a MNF game....that is just a general rule i go by.

That's absolutely absurd. The under on Monday night has been rare this year so far, but since 1985 the Over has come in 201 times and the Under 204.

Over the last five years before this one, the O-U is 45-40.

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

THis second half is a No Brainer....

Washington has shown some signs of moving the ball and playing good defense (minus some big plays). Turnovers have killed this skins team in the first half.

That field goal at the end of the half was huge for them and they will have the ball coming out of the half. The eagles are known for blowing leads and just playing it safe.

Look for the Skins to mount a comeback and take the plus money..

WASHINGTON pk second half for HUGE(<)<

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

You are ABSURD Kiln. Its like home dogs on MNF is a good bet (except today...although i think the skins have a shot of covering the 9.5)

AlistairCookie · Oct 26, 2009

The problem with that no-brainer is that you have to count on the worst team in the NFL to outscore somebody.

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

AlistairCookie said:
The problem with that no-brainer is that you have to count on the worst team in the NFL to outscore somebody.

i beg to differ. the WORST team in the NFL has to be the Raiders....hands down! i dunno how they won 2 games.....

well, maybe the RAMS are worse off....

skywalker95 · Oct 26, 2009

lets go with the Skins.. thanks.. be back later

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

UNDER second half also looks good...

AlistairCookie · Oct 26, 2009

donkeykong said:
i beg to differ. the WORST team in the NFL has to be the Raiders....hands down! i dunno how they won 2 games.....

well, maybe the RAMS are worse off....

Skins beat the eagles and gave SanDawg a run for their money.

Skins lost to Det, Carolina and KC who are all horrid.

Talent-wise - Skins should be contending with anyone from the East or NFC except Saints but they are so ineptly managed that I stand by their being the worst.

Wangster · Oct 26, 2009

I don't mean to jump in on your guys convo but I agree that the Skins are the WORST team on football.... what makes it worse as cookie mentioned is that they have so much talent.

They need new coach and def. a new QB (heck colt would do better than cambell)

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

This is it....this is the drive they have to score a TD for the second half to come home.....lets gooooooo

donkeykong · Oct 26, 2009

what the FK was that??? are they that stupid? what happened to kicking a FG??? omg this is trash......cant watch this garbage!!!

DONKEYKONG SECOND HALF WINNER on MNF

Banned

Banned

Banned

New member

Banned

New member

Banned

New member

New member

RDWHAHB

Banned

Banned

Member

Banned

New member

Banned

Member

RX Save the Human Race

Banned

Banned

Forum statistics

Share this page