Red Sox close to signing Lackey?

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,789
Tokens
http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2009/12/report_lackey_t.html



Sox close to signing Lackey?
Posted by Peter Abraham, Globe Staff December 14, 2009 01:05 PM
The Red Sox are moving close to a deal with free agent starting pitcher John Lackey according to a report by FoxSports' Ken Rosenthal, who confirmed an earlier Twitter report by Ed Price of AOL Fanhouse.
Lackey took a physical with the Red Sox this morning, which could be a precursor to his signing.
Signing the 31-year-old righthander would be in line with Theo Epstein saying he would look to improve the team in ways beyond adding offense.
A rotation of Jon Lester, Josh Beckett, Lackey, Daisuke Matsuzaka and either Clay Buchholz or Tim Wakefield would be better than what the Yankees have right now in CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, Andy Pettitte, TBA, TBA.
The deal, if there is one, also could be precursor to Buchholz being made available via trade. The Adrian Gonzalez drums will beat louder now.
Lackey was said to seeing a Burnett-type deal. The Yankees gave him five years and $82.5 million last winter. SI.com reported that Lackey could receive $85 million over five years. He is 102-71 in his career with a 3.81 ERA.
He is a low-maintenance "I want the ball" type of starter who missed roughly five starts last season with assorted issues, including a sore elbow that shelved him at the start of the season.
But he was sharp in the playoffs, allowing five earned runs on 19 hits over 19.2 innings while striking out 14.
He was the winning pitcher in Game 7 of the 2002 World Series during his rookie season, and according to baseball-reference.com, the pitcher he is most similar to in baseball history is none other than Beckett.
He has struggled in his career at Fenway, for what it's worth, going 2-5 with a 5.75 ERA in nine starts. But that was against the Red Sox.
UPDATE, 1:46 p.m.: The most interesting aspect of this deal could be the impact it has on teams interesting in trading for Roy Halladay. Signing Lackey also helps protect the Red Sox in the event Beckett leaves as a free agent following the 2010 season.
I saw a lot of Lackey last season, covering three Angels-Yankees series during the regular season and both playoffs series the Angels were in. He's not the most elegant starter you'll ever see, but he keeps his teams in games and the Angels loved playing behind him. This move would hurt the Angels badly.
UPDATE, 2:09 p.m.: George King of the Post suggests that Lackey going to Boston will decrease the desire for the Yankees to chase Roy Halladay.
King believes the Yankees were motivated to keep Halladay away from the Red Sox, much as was the case with Johan Santana. But look for the Angels to make a deal for Halladay now. If Lackey is out, they need him.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,029
Tokens
Red Sox sign John Lackey

n1155513131_594_tiny.jpg
by Eli Greenspan on Dec 14, 2009 4:01 PM EST
comment.v1599.png
0 comments
More photos » by Lenny Ignelzi - AP

Browse more photos »

The Red Sox and John Lackey have reportedly agreed to a five year deal worth 85 million dollars, SI.com's Jon Heyman is reporting.
 

New member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
6,559
Tokens
Good to get a solid free agent... Keep the prospects so they can sign a bat for the middle of the line-up.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Sox, Lackey agree to five-year deal..

It appears a contract between righthander John Lackey and the Red Sox is inevitable, if it's not already complete.

Depending on who you want to believe, the veteran Angels pitcher has agreed to a five-year deal with Boston for $85 million (so says Jon Heyman of Sports Illustrated) or worth slightly more than $82.5 (so says Jayson Stark of ESPN).


Either way, finalizing the deal appears to be a formality. Lackey took a physical with the Red Sox this morning, and players don't fly to a city in the dead of winter unless they're planning to sign.


If the deal is indeed complete, signing the 31-year-old righthander would be in line with Theo Epstein saying he would look to improve the team in ways beyond adding offense.



A rotation of Jon Lester, Josh Beckett, Lackey, Daisuke Matsuzaka, and Clay Buchholz or Tim Wakefield would be better than what the Yankees have right now in CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, Andy Pettitte, TBA, TBA.


The deal, also could be precursor to Buchholz being made available via trade. The Adrian Gonzalez drums will beat louder now.


Lackey was said to be seeking a Burnett-type deal, and it appears he got one. The Yankees gave him five years and $82.5 million last winter.



Lackey is 102-71 in his career with a 3.81 ERA. He is a low-maintenance "I want the ball" type of starter who missed about five starts last season with assorted health issues, including a sore elbow that shelved him at the start of the season.


But he was sharp in the playoffs, allowing five earned runs on 19 hits over 19 2/3 innings while striking out 14.


He was the winning pitcher in Game 7 of the 2002 World Series during his rookie season, and according to baseball-reference.com, the pitcher he is most similar to in baseball history is none other than Beckett.


He has struggled in his career at Fenway, for what it's worth, going 2-5 with a 5.75 ERA in nine starts. But that was against the Red Sox.


The news that the Red Sox were closing in on a deal with Lackey was broken by FoxSports' Ken Rosenthal, who confirmed an earlier Twitter report by Ed Price of AOL Fanhouse.


UPDATE, 1:46 p.m.: The most interesting aspect of this deal could be the impact it has on teams interesting in trading for Roy Halladay. Signing Lackey also helps protect the Red Sox in the event Beckett leaves as a free agent following the 2010 season.


I saw a lot of Lackey last season, covering three Angels-Yankees series during the regular season and both playoffs series the Angels were in. He's not the most elegant starter you'll ever see, but he keeps his teams in games and the Angels loved playing behind him. This move would hurt the Angels badly.


UPDATE, 2:09 p.m.: George King of the Post suggests that Lackey going to Boston will decrease the desire for the Yankees to chase Roy Halladay.
King believes the Yankees were motivated to keep Halladay away from the Red Sox, much as was the case with Johan Santana. But look for the Angels to make a deal for Halladay now. If Lackey is out, they need him.


(Note: There are multiple reports this afternoon that Halladay is headed to Philadelphia in a three-way deal that will send Cliff Lee to the Mariners.)


Boston Globe...


---------------------


PS by wil.

What is it with Cliff Lee, the guy is a monster on the hill and nobody wants to keep him. To hell with Lackey and Halladay (who are both very good) but give me Cliff Lee from what I saw of him the last two years.
 

Member
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
31,627
Tokens
i still rate halladay the best of all of them, but i would like all on my team
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,789
Tokens
http://mlb.sbnation.com/2011/9/16/2429014/just-how-bad-has-john-lackey-been

Just How Bad Has John Lackey Been?

242393_Blue_Jays_Red_Sox_Baseball_large.jpg
Boston Red Sox starter John Lackey hands the ball to manager Terry Francona as he is taken out of the game against the Toronto Blue Jays in the sixth inning during a baseball game at Fenway Park in Boston. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)




By Marc Normandin - Contributor
It's obvious John Lackey is not having a good season but, within the long history of the Red Sox, this is turning out to be one of the worst.

Follow @sbnbaseball on Twitter, and Like Baseball Nation on Facebook.
No Red Sox pitcher has ever finished with an ERA over 6.00 while throwing 150 innings in a season.
That nugget comes from the Twitter account of Brian MacPherson, a Red Sox beat writer for the Providence Journal. The reason that MacPherson bothered to look that up was the day's starter, John Lackey: he entered his Wednesday start against the Blue Jays with 144 innings pitched and an ERA of 6.30.
Lackey finished the day after 5-1/3 innings, pushing his ERA to 6.19. Now just one out is all that separates Lackey from a rounded-off bit of history, and, given his performance this year, there is little reason to hope he is going to be able to avoid being the only Sox pitcher in their long existence to suffer this badly at the hands of ERA.
The current five worst ERAs, minimum 150 innings pitched (but including Lackey at 149-2/3 innings) for the Red Sox:


Rk Player ERA IP Year GS
1John Lackey6.19 149.2 2011 26
2Jack Lamabe5.89 177.1 1964 25
3Dennis Eckersley5.61176.1 1983 28
4 Tom Gordon 5.59215.2 1996 34
5 Mark Portugal 5.51150.1 1999 27
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,228
Messages
13,449,769
Members
99,402
Latest member
jb52197
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com