Colts President Polian "We didn't feel like 16-0 was a historic achievement".

Search

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Albert Breer December 29, 2009 05:36 PM.

Interesting point of view from Colts president Bill Polian a few minutes ago on NFL Network's Across the League program. Here's why he said he wasn't interested in 16-0 (or 19-0 for that matter) ...

080221_polian_H.hmedium.jpg


Indianapolis Colts President Bill Polian.

"I thought we had made it very plain that 16-0 was not a goal for us," Polian said. "What we’ve said, it seems, repeatedly, since Halloween almost, was that 16-0, we did not feel was a historic achievement. What was important to us, and what we tried very hard to do, coming off a short week against Jacksonville, after we had wrapped up the home-field advantage, was to set two records. One was for the most consecutive regular-season games won.

"We were tied with New England for that, and now we have it for ourselves, and secondly, for the most games won this decade, and I don’t believe anyone can catch us now no matter what happens this week. We felt those were both extremely historical milestones that were worth going out there and risking everything for."

And if Polian didn't side-swipe the Patriots enough there, there was this: "New England did not win the Super Bowl, and they are not considered an undefeated team, and so it would not have been complete had we not gone all the way. And to us, since it had been done before (by the 1972 Dolphins), it was not as historic a milestone," as the aforementioned ones.

Ouch!!!! I can see where some of you may want to stop reading here. Feel free to follow the jump for more of Polian's reasoning, and just who made the decision on Sunday.


"We went over it during the week with Mr. (Jim) Irsay, among many other people," Polian explained. "And we were quite public about it, as well. Both coach (Jim Caldwell) and I were asked about it quite frequently, and we responded that this was our plan. The timing was entirely up to coach, it was his decision to make as to when we took the players out.

"And by the way, it was Peyton (Manning), Reggie Wayne, who was battling a sore toe and sore groin, Dallas Clark, who had a thigh contusion, and I think that was. Joseph Addai went out earlier in the game with an injury."

Polian explained that he's proud that those players are upset about losing the game. But he said that there was evidence for his decision's validity that came up almost immediately after Manning and Co. were yanked.

"When Jim Sorgi had to be placed on injured reserve with shoulder problems, it was evident to coach and myself that we had to be very careful with Peyton, because there’s no one out there we could bring in that could handle the load of being the backup quarterback," Polian said. "Curtis Painter is a rookie and we’re in a situation where we had to be very careful with him.

"As a matter of fact, Gijon Robinson, our starting tight end, went out with a knee injury which will keep him out a couple of weeks at the same time those fellas came out of the game. On the very next series, I believe, the Jets blitzed as they do frequently, and Gijon’s substitute missed the blitz pickup and the quarterback got hit and fumbled and resulted in a touchdown. And while we wish no ill to Curtis, had that been Peyton, I and many, many others would’ve felt a heck of a lot worse."

And so there you have it.

Boston Globe
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
Hopefully they lose their 1st playoff game.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
I don't buy the injury bs. If you're concerned about any of your startes getting hurt then why play them at all? What, they can't get hurt in the 1st half?

The only way that makes sense is if they benched all their starters completely for the last two games.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
396
Tokens
Yeah, that consecutive regular season games win streak, I'm sure everyone will be talking about that "milestone" 35-40 years from now, just like we all keep bringing up the Dolphins '72 perfect season. Their record during that "streak" especially stands out in comparison to their 0-1 playoff record in the middle of it.

And the Colts apparently won the most games this decade. I really don't know how on earth I was not aware of such an important achievement. That is infinitely more important than how many Superbowls you win or having a perfect season. I'm sure we will all be talking about that achievement for years to come.
 

RX Prophet
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
8,000
Tokens
Polian is pure class. If you have a problem with the way he runs his team then you must be a fan of a team with a better record......Doubt it!
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
Polian is pure class. If you have a problem with the way he runs his team then you must be a fan of a team with a better record......Doubt it!

Yeah, with all those winning records they must have been in what, 4 or 5 SB's?
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
Most games this decade?

They should have asked him who won the most games the last 3 decades.

I bet nobody knows - and nobody fucking cares either.

23 regular season wins in a row?

Who had that record before the Pats?

I bet nobody knows - and nobody fucking cares either.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
12,563
Tokens
nobody cares about 16-0 either unless your a kid like texansfan heh
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
Id hate the Colts too if I was a Texans fan.:ohno:

I hear ya on that one, the Colts have our number. Victories without SB's though mean nothing though.

GTC, how you enjoying your high school holiday break? You know nothing about sports. You should post on facebook with the rest of the kiddos.
 

I can't dance
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,098
Tokens
I don't play golf, but I heard getting a hole in one is kind of cool.

I don't go bowling either, but if I did and had a chance at a perfect game, keep rolling those balls until your arm falls off.

What the Colts did was bush league move.

Are the Colts organization playing for the football fans or themselves?

The players play for the entertainment of the fans, who in turn provide incomes to the players often in the millions. And what happens? They play second stringers when a perfect season was a real possibility.

Just watch, come playoffs, they will receive the officiating that Seattle got in their Superbowl.
 

no stripes on my shirt but i can make her pu**y wh
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
4,570
Tokens
I hear ya on that one, the Colts have our number. Victories without SB's though mean nothing though.

GTC, how you enjoying your high school holiday break? You know nothing about sports. You should post on facebook with the rest of the kiddos.

:):)
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
I can understand not thinking 16-0 is important. It's dumb but understandable.

... but then you're going to brag about most wins this decade? That's just fucking sad and that's what makes Bill Polian a fucking joke.

As for "class", an owner that ran away from Baltimore in the middle of the night shouldn't even mention the word.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
I agree with cincy. People to this day still talk about the 72 Dolphins and their undefeated SB winning year.

Who gives a shit who won the most games this decade, or any other decade for that matter.

The Colts have no integrity and their excuses regarding injuries are lame to say the least.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
324
Tokens
Colts do this every year. They run away with the division start resting guys in the last 2 weeks, the team gets out of sync and than they lose their 1st play-off game at home.

Funny the one year they won the super bowl they didnt have the so-called advantage of resting players.
 

RX Prophet
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
8,000
Tokens
As stated before...If you dont like the Colts making thier own decisions on how they want to prepare for the playoffs....Then dont allow them to dominate the regular season. By dominating the regular season that allows them the right to do whatever they want. Bottom line....Beat them!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
2,896
Tokens
As stated before...If you dont like the Colts making thier own decisions on how they want to prepare for the playoffs....Then dont allow them to dominate the regular season. By dominating the regular season that allows them the right to do whatever they want. Bottom line....Beat them!

I'm with what he just said:toast:
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
As stated before...If you dont like the Colts making thier own decisions on how they want to prepare for the playoffs....Then dont allow them to dominate the regular season. By dominating the regular season that allows them the right to do whatever they want. Bottom line....Beat them!

This post was so clueless, I thought about ignoring it. Then I decided to reply.

The Colts did NOT decide shit. The players who went 14-0 had no say. Peyton Manning didn't like the decision.

Bill Polian decided. Caldwell decided. They didn't go 14-0 so it was easy for them to say it wasn't important.

So what was important? Most wins in a decade!!!!!!

The players did not decide to pull starters. Many Colts fans are upset. Many players must be upset. Peyton Manning is undoubtedly upset.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
1,894
Tokens
dude must be on crack. i never heard of a team president or owner not wanting their team to have a historic type record. well, a good record that is.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,089
Messages
13,448,419
Members
99,392
Latest member
nevillberger
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com