Women's groups urge CBS to drop Tebow Super Bowl ad

Search
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
NEW YORK (AP)

A national coalition of women's groups called on CBS on Monday to scrap its plan to broadcast an ad during the Super Bowl featuring college football star Tim Tebow and his mother, which critics say is likely to convey an anti-abortion message.


"An ad that uses sports to divide rather than to unite has no place in the biggest national sports event of the year -- an event designed to bring Americans together," said Jemhu Greene, president of the New York-based Women's Media Center.

The center was coordinating the protest with backing from the National Organization for Women, the Feminist Majority and other groups.

CBS said it has approved the script for the 30-second ad and has given no indication that the protest would have an impact. A network spokesman, Dana McClintock, said CBS would ensure that any issue-oriented ad was "appropriate for air."

The ad -- paid for by the conservative Christian group Focus on the Family -- is expected to recount the story of Pam Tebow's pregnancy in 1987 with a theme of "Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life." After getting sick during a mission trip to the Philippines, she ignored a recommendation by doctors to abort her fifth child and gave birth to Tim, who went on to win the 2007 Heisman Trophy while helping his Florida team to two BCS championships.

The controversy over the ad was raised Sunday when Tebow met with reporters in Mobile, Ala., before beginning preparations for next weekend's Senior Bowl.

"I know some people won't agree with it, but I think they can at least respect that I stand up for what I believe," Tebow said. "I've always been very convicted of it (his views on abortion) because that's the reason I'm here, because my mom was a very courageous woman. So any way that I could help, I would do it."

Thirty-second commercials during the Super Bowl are selling for $2.5 million to $2.8 million. Gary Schneeberger, a spokesman for Focus on the Family, said funds for the Tebow ad were donated by a few "very generous friends" and did not come from the group's general fund.

Schneeberger said he and his colleagues "were a little surprised" at the furor over the ad.

"There's nothing political and controversial about it," he said. "When the day arrives, and you sit down to watch the game on TV, those who oppose it will be quite surprised at what the ad is all about."

The protest letter from the Women's Media Center suggested that CBS should have turned down the ad in part because it was conceived by Focus on the Family.

"By offering one of the most coveted advertising spots of the year to an anti-equality, anti-choice, homophobic organization, CBS is aligning itself with a political stance that will damage its reputation, alienate viewers, and discourage consumers from supporting its shows and advertisers," the letter said.

However, Schneeberger said CBS officials carefully examined Focus on the Family's track record and found no basis for rejecting the ad.

"We understand that some people don't think very highly of what we do," Schneeberger said. "We're not trying to sell you a soft drink -- we're not selling anything. We're trying to celebrate families."

The idea for the ad came from an employee in Focus on the Family's film department, Schneeberger said, and the Tebows "were thrilled" when it was proposed to them. The Tebows, including Tim, have been outspoken in discussing their Christian faith and their missionary work.

All the national networks, including CBS, have policies that rule out the broadcast of certain types of contentious advocacy ads. In 2004, CBS cited such a policy in rejecting an ad by the liberal-leaning United Church of Christ highlighting the UCC's welcoming stance toward gays and others who might feel shunned by more conservative churches.

CBS was criticized for rejecting that ad -- and perhaps might have worried about comparable criticism from conservatives if it had rejected an ad featuring such a charismatic and well-known figure as Tebow.

CBS noted that it had run some advocacy ads in recent months, including spots taking conflicting sides in the debate of a national health care overhaul.

Terry O'Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, said she had respect for the private choices made by women such as Pam Tebow but condemned the planned ad as "extraordinarily offensive and demeaning."

"That's not being respectful of other people's lives," O'Neill said. "It is offensive to hold one way out as being a superior way over everybody else's."

A national columnist for CBSSports.com, Gregg Doyel, also objected to the CBS decision to show the ad, specifically because it would air on Super Sunday.


"If you're a sports fan, and I am, that's the holiest day of the year," he wrote. "It's not a day to discuss abortion. For it, against it, I don't care what you are. On Super Sunday, I don't care what I am. Feb. 7 is simply not the day to have that discussion."
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
"We understand that some people don't think very highly of what we do," Schneeberger said. "We're not trying to sell you a soft drink -- we're not selling anything. We're trying to celebrate families."

And the only way they can celebrate families is by spending $2.8 million for an ad during the Super Bowl? Since when is a spot aired during the Super Bowl not trying to sell you something? Uhhh, I kinda think that's the purpose of it. If they're trying to celebrate families then why don't they use that $2.8 million to aid needy families? Liars and hypocrites.
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
kudos to cbs for not caving in.....

wasn't there an ad last year that featured obama that pissed some people off and ended up not getting shown?
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
D2Bets

Could not have put it better if I tried for a week. Regarless of what side you are on the cash surely could be used more wisely to help the needy.


Thanks, wil...
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
nbc rejected this ad last year

the godless heathens~~:<<


<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/V2CaBR3z85c&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/V2CaBR3z85c&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
And the only way they can celebrate families is by spending $2.8 million for an ad during the Super Bowl? Since when is a spot aired during the Super Bowl not trying to sell you something? Uhhh, I kinda think that's the purpose of it. If they're trying to celebrate families then why don't they use that $2.8 million to aid needy families? Liars and hypocrites.

Great post!!!!
 

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
3,112
Tokens
I think 1 post stating your opinion was enough soonerdawg. No need for 3.
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,362
Tokens
"We understand that some people don't think very highly of what we do," Schneeberger said. "We're not trying to sell you a soft drink -- we're not selling anything. We're trying to celebrate families."

And the only way they can celebrate families is by spending $2.8 million for an ad during the Super Bowl? Since when is a spot aired during the Super Bowl not trying to sell you something? Uhhh, I kinda think that's the purpose of it. If they're trying to celebrate families then why don't they use that $2.8 million to aid needy families? Liars and hypocrites.

The first thing I thought of when reading this was the same thing you mentioned, that they ARE trying to sell something. However, these people are often legalistic in nature and what he may have meant is that they are not trying to sell a PRODUCT. I think we all can agree that he is trying to sell an idea.

As far as spending this money on the SB ad, perhaps they feel that they can save lives with this message and the lives they save are more important than the food they give to the needy (just taking a guess here). I'm pretty sure they already give money to needy people so perhaps they feel they have that covered already.

Just trying to get in their heads as to why they would do this.
 

Rx Alchemist.
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
3,329
Tokens
I love al the high and mighty on here saying she should donate the cost of the commercial to charity, "It will do so much more good"

How do you know that she already hasn't given millions to charity?

How do you know that she hasn't donated more than just money to the needy?

How do you know that she hasn't given her time to the needy?

How do you know that she hasn't done more than you?

If she wants to spend her money on a Super Bowl ad and the Network approved it, then it is her right to do so as an American.
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
As far as spending this money on the SB ad, perhaps they feel that they can save lives with this message and the lives they save are more important than the food they give to the needy.

i agree. if it inspires even one woman to forego having an abortion, then it's a life saved, and you can't put a price tag on that. i saw an interview with a woman a few minutes ago who claimed that the ad was going to be hateful and divisive. what a stupid bitch.

you know why the pro choicers are pissed off? because there's no responsible or tasteful way for them to offer a rebuttal. cbs already stated that they would consider commerials from anyone, giving a subtle hint that they would allow a commercial with an opposing viewpoint.

what is a pro choice organization going to do? submit a commercial that shows a baby getting its brain sucked out of its skull? that's why they're pissed, there's really no way they can make a respectable commercial from their perspective....

it's not like the at & t vs verizon spots, or chevy vs ford, or bk vs mickey d's.....
 

Rx Alchemist.
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
3,329
Tokens
It is funny how these people are all for choice as long as that choice is not life.

Just follow the money. Pro choice people do not defend women's rights. They exploit them. The abortion industy is a million dollar (if not billion dollar) industry. They do not like anything threatening their cash cow.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,093
Messages
13,448,514
Members
99,393
Latest member
jaybone34
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com