NCAA ready for expansion to a 96 team field for Post Season Championship Tourney.

Search

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
NDIANAPOLIS (AP)—The NCAA appears to be on the verge of expanding the men’s basketball tournament to 96 teams.

Insisting that nothing has been decided, NCAA vice president Greg Shaheen nonetheless outlined a detailed plan Thursday that included the logistics and timing of a 96-team tournament, how much time off the players would have and even revenue distribution.

Shaheen said the NCAA looked at keeping the current 65-team field and expanding to 68 or 80 teams, but decided the bigger bracket was best fit logistically and financially.

It would be played during the same time frame as the current three-week tournament and include first-round byes for 32 teams.

Although the plan still needs to be approved by the Division I Men’s Basketball Committee and passed on to the board of directors, most of the details already seem to be in place.

“We needed to make sure that we did everything possible to use the due diligence window to understand ourselves and understand what the future would hold,” Shaheen said. “So that’s what we’re doing, that’s the process we’re undertaking. We’ve been handling it every day for the last several months and years, as we studied for the benefit of the organization.”

The men’s tournament last expanded in 2001, adding one team to the 64-team field that was set in 1985.

The 96-team tournament would likely envelop the 32-team NIT, though Shaheen said no decision has been made on what to do with the NCAA’s other, independently operated season-ending tournament.

The new format would start two days later than the current 65-team field because it would eliminate the Tuesday play-in game and would conclude on the same day, a Monday. It would be played at one fewer venue—again, the play-in game—and the NCAA says it would include no additional travel time for teams.

The first-round games for the 64 non-bye teams would take place on Thursday and Friday, with the winners playing the top eight seeds in each region on Saturday and Sunday. Winners on Saturday would likely play again on Tuesday, and the Sunday winners on Wednesday.

Those winners would then move on to the regionals, playing alternate days starting on Thursday. Shaheen said the NCAA hasn’t decided on whether to keep the same sites for second and first-round games or to make the midweek sites the same as the regionals.

He also said the amount of time student-athletes would be out of school would be roughly the same as the current model, but teams that play in the opening round and keep winning would actually be out an entire week of school instead of just a few days.

“On a 96-team basis—vs. the current 97 teams that the NCAA conducts through the championship and the NIT, for example—you have, on a side-by-side basis, a reduction in the travel time,” Shaheen said.

Adding teams to the NCAA tournament could create some monumentally lopsided games, or seeds in the 30s and 90s playing each other. There might be less importance on the regular season and conference tournaments; the resume wouldn’t need to be padded so much if more teams get in.

“I don’t see any watering down at all,” Minnesota coach Tubby Smith said. “I think there are a number of teams playing in the NIT that could have gotten in, and I think there will be more people and more excitement with more teams in.”

Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said he would like to see regular-season and conference tournament champions get automatic bids to the NCAA tournament.

“The regular season would mean something,” he said. “There would still be bubble teams and all that, but we would reward those teams accordingly. And I would still like the conference tournament champions. They make a lot of money and celebrate each conference. I think it’s a way of each conference celebrating their conference, which is a good thing.”

Any plans to expand the tournament hinge on the NCAA’s $6 billion television deal with CBS.

The 11-year deal, signed in 1999, has a mutual opt-out until July 31. The NCAA has already spoken with numerous networks about expansion, so the opt-out is at least on the table, and adding 32 more teams is certainly going to bring in more revenue.

The proposal is strictly for the men’s tournament. Another NCAA committee is looking at whether to expand the women’s tournament or keep it in the current format.

YahooSports.com
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
What a horrible idea. I'm sure ESPN will be the player for the 1st and 2nd round games. Nothing can beat Bilas and ESPN now complaining about the merits of Drake and San Diego St's chances of making the tourney. Total cash grab by the NCAA.

All this and we cannot have a college football playoff.
 

Rx Junior
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
1,588
Tokens
Th one thing I look foward to every March is the tourney. And the NCAA know this so like any smart business move, money was the motivation. Everyone will continue to watch and us wackos will gamble on this shit still.
 

Rx Junior
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
1,588
Tokens
I actually like the NIT. Those bubble teams really are granted a good opportunity to build on their season.
 
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
2,958
Tokens
Keep it at 64 teams but have a "play in" week.

31 automatic qualifiers stay the same, those teams all make the 64 team field.

Then go ahead and have 33 "play in" games for the teams that didn't take the automatic bid from their conference....so for instance, Duke, Kansas, and Kentucky would have all made the 64 team field because they won their conference tournament, but Syracuse would have to play 1 "play in" game against the last of the 97 teams.....take the 33 winners plus your automatic qualifiers and you can then seed the tournament like they've done in the past....The NIT could consist of the losers of the play in games. This would make winning your Conference tournament more important then ever before.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
Regular season will mean nothing and the conference tournaments even less...more injuries also...

64 teams is enough...
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
Goes to show the basketball players are smarter than football players. Guess the university presidents don't care how much class time they miss.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2005
Messages
1,559
Tokens
Stupid idea. They may as well just let every team in the 'tournament' and start it at the beginning of the season. Don't they make enough money from this thing already? Greedy bastards.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
327
Tokens
NIT had a bunch of nobody teams with 1 or two wins over 50%. I don't want a watered down product.

GREED is all this is, they don't care about the players, it's all about the bank accounts and revenues.

What happens when Dick Vitale, Jay "loudmouth" Bilas and others complain that Illinois Chicago and Monmouth deserved to be in the tournament.

I hope they can't find 96 teams to make it next year.

If they want real $$$ get a college football playoff. Every division has one but the main, that's assanine.
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,168
Tokens
I don't like the idea that much but I guess you kill 2 birds with one stone by increasing the number of teams & concentrating on one tournament while eliminating the NIT.....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,591
Messages
13,452,739
Members
99,424
Latest member
suheb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com