No hitter system play (9-3, 75%)

OK guys, here's a system play for you. I have data that goes back to 2002, and this system deals with playing teams the day after they get no hit, so in this case, it will be today's Braves-Rockies game.

--Play AGAINST teams the day after they get no hit. Teams struggle in their next outing, going 3-9 overall and averaging just 2.5 runs per game.
--Take the UNDER the day after a team gets no hit, as the under is 9-3 since 2002. All results documented below:

I like the Rockies +125 and the under 9. :toast:

2009

Team that got no hit: Tampa
Next game: Won 4-2

Team that go no hit: San Diego
Next game: Lost 2-1

2008

Team that got no hit: Houston
Next game: Lost 6-1

Team that got no hit: Kansas City
Next game: Lost 2-1

2007

Team that got no hit: Baltimore
Next game: Lost 3-2

Team that got no hit: Milwaukee
Next game: Won 3-2

Team that got no hit: Texas
Next game: Lost 6-4

2006

Team that got no hit: Arizona
Next game: Lost 6-2

2004

Team that got no hit: Atlanta
Next game: Lost 6-4 (in 11)

2003

Team that got no hit: NY Yankees
Next game: Win 6-5

Team that got no hit: SF Giants
Next game: Lost 4-2

2002

Team that got no hit: Tampa Bay
Next game: Lost 3-2

I'll follow you on the Rockies. I very rarely play both side and total because it just never seems to ever work for me across all sports.

Interesting, I think the sample size might be too small, but nice research and I may make a small play, thanks!

Dongville said:

Interesting, I think the sample size might be too small, but nice research and I may make a small play, thanks!

Click to expand...

Yep, agree completely.

Still ... if nothing else, if you leaned Braves, I might consider second guessing that pick.

wasnt Atlanta no hit last year?

No

Buerhle also threw a no hitter last yr. Where are the stats for that?

varkeyboy said:

Buerhle also threw a no hitter last yr. Where are the stats for that?

Click to expand...

Why can't you read?

The game is listed. The Rays got no-hit against Buehrle.