hno:^^
Exactly however Russel did a pretty horrible job explaining why he should win. (Amanda screwed this up in the past also.) They just need to be honest to the jury. Russel should have said, "I fought my hardest to survive every day and at times I had to lie and break alliances which isnt something to be proud of but it is just part of the game. Overall, I was the mastermind behind the majority of strategic moves."
ya when he realized he wasnt going to get a single vote.......he got slightly ashen...........and after he got mad..........i like the show im glad sandra won......hubby is fighting in afghanistan mom just passes etc. etc.......the format at the end isnt maybe the best but thats the show
Russell said he was on ONE Survivor ... what he meant was that he never got the chance to "digest" the shit from the first season and make adjustments for the 2nd season.
That being said, he went mano-a-mano with Boston Rob and kicked his ass ... so he's got game ... just didn't understand he was dealing with cry-babies.
That being said, he went mano-a-mano with Boston Rob and kicked his ass ... so he's got game ... just didn't understand he was dealing with cry-babies.
I dont think getting along is what should be the standard for choosing the winner...if that was the case, Colby or Rupert would win every time...Russell out played everyone..its a GAME...the object is to do whats best for you to win the game...if the jury cant figure that out, Survivor needs to do something else to reward game play and not let the jury vote...Sandra did NOTHING in that game..Russell took all the risks and played brilliantly and because there were some bruised egos they wouldnt vote for him...funnier than hell watching Boston Rob talk smack to Russell when Russell treated him like his little bitch and had him evicted....classy Rob!!
