I have no wagering interest on this hockey game..........

billhill999 · May 23, 2010

But it seems to me that was a total Black Hawk setup.

A phantom penalty that late in the third period, a penalty which rarely is called, leads to a Black Hawk apparant game and series winning goal at home.

Like I said, I have nothing riding on this, so it's not sour grapes, just seems funny to an innocent bystander how that just went down.

KingofNicotine · May 23, 2010

What the hell just happened there? How come there was no goalie for the Sharks?

SportSavant · May 23, 2010

was a good opportunity for Live wagering when San Jose took the 1-0 lead. Unfortunatly I didnt take it but at that time chicago was available at around +140 or therabouts (after the first).

SportSavant · May 23, 2010

KingofNicotine said:
What the hell just happened there? How come there was no goalie for the Sharks?

:lolBIG:

hno:

KingofNicotine · May 23, 2010

I never watch hockey and I just happened to tune in at that exact moment.

Mr.Leisure · May 23, 2010

billhill999 said:
But it seems to me that was a total Black Hawk setup.

A phantom penalty that late in the third period, a penalty which rarely is called, leads to a Black Hawk apparant game and series winning goal at home.

Like I said, I have nothing riding on this, so it's not sour grapes, just seems funny to an innocent bystander how that just went down.

Agree 100 %

viking611 · May 23, 2010

SportSavant said:
was a good opportunity for Live wagering when San Jose took the 1-0 lead. Unfortunatly I didnt take it but at that time chicago was available at around +140 or therabouts (after the first).

do you know what it was after 2 periods? was gonna throw a wager on it when i saw it was tied up, without even seeing any of the game.

X-Files · May 23, 2010

billhill999 said:
A phantom penalty that late in the third period, a penalty which rarely is called, leads to a Black Hawk apparant game and series winning goal at home.

A little justice for game 3 when SJ had 3 times as many power plays,
including a 5 on 3. The refs also gift wrapped SJ's series vs Detroit.
Corruption in sports officiating is nothing new. Get used to it.

billhill999 · May 23, 2010

Don't have to tell me about corruption, I was a kid when Earl Monroe 'accidently' put the ball in the wrong basket with 2 seconds on the clock to dick thousands of New York Knick wagers.

bigtendominator · May 23, 2010

billhill999 said:
Don't have to tell me about corruption, I was a kid when Earl Monroe 'accidently' put the ball in the wrong basket with 2 seconds on the clock to dick thousands of New York Knick wagers.

Bill, what are you talking about? Slightly before my time.

FairWarning · May 23, 2010

viking611 said:
do you know what it was after 2 periods? was gonna throw a wager on it when i saw it was tied up, without even seeing any of the game.

I played Chicago -1.5 +325 after 2.

billhill999 · May 23, 2010

bigtendominator said:
Bill, what are you talking about? Slightly before my time.

I was like it 6 or 7th grade, my uncle used to bet the games, large, with other Italians from my moms side. (He was the man who taught me about the 'hook' in football, but I digress)

I remember my uncle and others had the Knicks one night for about 3 dimes or so in the early 70's, the Knicks were -5 or something like that, they were up 6 with two seconds left, I think they were playing the Bullets that night, anyhow, one of the Bullets missed a field goal with 2 seconds left, Monroe grabs the rebound under the basket, for no explained reason decided to bank in an uncontested layup (In the wrong basket) as the buzzer sounded making the Knicks a 4 point winner instead of 6 with the line being five.

Now in the early 70's, there were no computers, there was no access to how much money and what percentage was on what side, but the word was a shitload of gamblers in NYC that were on the Knicks that night took a blood bath.

Maniac · May 23, 2010

Chicago were available at around +400 ish when they were 2-0 down

At 2-2 end of the 2nd Period I saw Chicago at -175

JohnnyMac · May 23, 2010

If you would have watched the Red Wings get jobbed in round 2, you would not be surprised.

billhill999 · May 23, 2010

^
I did, and I'm not.

I have no wagering interest on this hockey game..........

Search

billhill999

New member

KingofNicotine

New member

SportSavant

New member

SportSavant

New member

KingofNicotine

New member

Mr.Leisure

Pour your misery down on me

viking611

www.youtubecom/hubbardsmusic

X-Files

fbi

billhill999

New member

bigtendominator

New member

FairWarning

Official Rx music critic and beer snob

billhill999

New member

Maniac

New member

JohnnyMac

Defender of the Faith

billhill999

New member

Forum statistics

Share this page