Might be the biggest sucker bet I've seen all season

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
Talking about Philadelphia -1.5.

Fade this. I've never seen every single square put out a +EV number like this.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
+EV would imply that it's a good bet.
Yes it would.

SIA, Bodog, BetOnline, Sportsbetting, all had -110 on the Padres.

Not to mention Stations, Stratosphere, Peppermill in Vegas.

All while Pinnacle throws out -122/+113. Big mistake.

Usually it's just one book, but every idiot book put out -110.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
1,950
Tokens
they are going to give us a heart attack...arent they
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
1,950
Tokens
:103631605

another day at the office

damn that over
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
Yes it would.

SIA, Bodog, BetOnline, Sportsbetting, all had -110 on the Padres.

Not to mention Stations, Stratosphere, Peppermill in Vegas.

All while Pinnacle throws out -122/+113. Big mistake.

Usually it's just one book, but every idiot book put out -110.

Do you play a lot of +1.5 RL's? It would make sense that the books that book strictly square players would have some good lines on the +1.5's. I've just never really looked for opportunities like this. 90% of my plays are on the ML. I'm going to have to put some effort into this.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
Do you play a lot of +1.5 RL's? It would make sense that the books that book strictly square players would have some good lines on the +1.5's. I've just never really looked for opportunities like this. 90% of my plays are on the ML. I'm going to have to put some effort into this.
90% of my plays are on the big underdog on the +1.5. That's where all the value is.

The square thought is "Well, they're probably going to win... and it will most likely be by more than one... and I get it for so much cheaper."

This yields significant +EV wagers on the other side. It's even better when the number moves against them (see Cleveland-Chicago).
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
I will say that's it's gonna take some balls to consistently lay -130 and above on underdogs, no matter how +EV the RL bets are. But I guess the books are in the same position consistently.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
1,950
Tokens
Do you play a lot of +1.5 RL's? It would make sense that the books that book strictly square players would have some good lines on the +1.5's. I've just never really looked for opportunities like this. 90% of my plays are on the ML. I'm going to have to put some effort into this.

thats why they dont care what those numbers are because their players aren't looking that way....
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
90% of my plays are on the big underdog on the +1.5. That's where all the value is.

The square thought is "Well, they're probably going to win... and it will most likely be by more than one... and I get it for so much cheaper."

This yields significant +EV wagers on the other side. It's even better when the number moves against them (see Cleveland-Chicago).

I do remember Simon from Pinnacle saying 4-5 years back that if you played the dog on the RL in all the -200 and above games, you would come out ahead betting them blindly over the course of the year, provided you got the best number.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,262
Messages
13,449,971
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com