Yes it would.+EV would imply that it's a good bet.
Yes it would.
SIA, Bodog, BetOnline, Sportsbetting, all had -110 on the Padres.
Not to mention Stations, Stratosphere, Peppermill in Vegas.
All while Pinnacle throws out -122/+113. Big mistake.
Usually it's just one book, but every idiot book put out -110.
90% of my plays are on the big underdog on the +1.5. That's where all the value is.Do you play a lot of +1.5 RL's? It would make sense that the books that book strictly square players would have some good lines on the +1.5's. I've just never really looked for opportunities like this. 90% of my plays are on the ML. I'm going to have to put some effort into this.
Do you play a lot of +1.5 RL's? It would make sense that the books that book strictly square players would have some good lines on the +1.5's. I've just never really looked for opportunities like this. 90% of my plays are on the ML. I'm going to have to put some effort into this.
90% of my plays are on the big underdog on the +1.5. That's where all the value is.
The square thought is "Well, they're probably going to win... and it will most likely be by more than one... and I get it for so much cheaper."
This yields significant +EV wagers on the other side. It's even better when the number moves against them (see Cleveland-Chicago).