Good read..................http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playo...linger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Lakers
It may be the ultimate goal, but it is not the single measuring stick. Were the Nets really equally as successful as the Celtics this year, despite not reaching their goals?
The value of a championship changes as the game changes. Athletes were less capable in the earliest years of the league
Intuitively I would have said Celtics, but would have to look deeper into the teams. What I do know for sure is anyone who does not allow for any subjectivity is wrong
Any discussion that does not allow for subjectivity is either stupid, boring or worthless. On this, it could be good if someone would offer something other than counting the number of championships. Close enough that the 46 or 47 years without a championship could make up the difference between the 16 or 17 years they did win. . .
Easy winner...http://habs.com/
