Disgruntled Gambler Sues ********, Claims UIGEA Violation
An Internet gambler from Massachusetts recently sued ******** Corporation in Federal District Court seeking to recover $8,000 he lost gambling plus an extra $16,000 in damages for the emotional distress he allegedly suffered. The claim? That ******** “violated the 2007 gambling enforcement act of 2007 [sic] by putting through gambling transactions totaling $15,500 on the plaintiff’s credit card.” The plaintiff sued ******** on August 26, 2010.
This is crazy on so many levels.
First, the UIGEA provisions relating to financial services companies (such as ********) did not go into effect until June 1, 2010. Banks and other payment processors were originally given until December 1, 2009, to implement regulations under the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, but were given a 6 month reprieve thanks to an extension passed late in 2009.
The plaintiff claims ******** is negligent for processing transactions in August and September 2009, before the financial services rules were in effect.
But perhaps more disturbing is that the guy lost a boat-load of money engaging in (apparently) illegal gambling, and now is asking for ******** (and, effectively) other ******** customers to share in his loss.
It also turns out that the same guy sued at least one other company for a similar reason (he sued TD Bank on August 26, seeking damages of $80,000 — he lost over $15,000 from his TD Bank account).
An Internet gambler from Massachusetts recently sued ******** Corporation in Federal District Court seeking to recover $8,000 he lost gambling plus an extra $16,000 in damages for the emotional distress he allegedly suffered. The claim? That ******** “violated the 2007 gambling enforcement act of 2007 [sic] by putting through gambling transactions totaling $15,500 on the plaintiff’s credit card.” The plaintiff sued ******** on August 26, 2010.
This is crazy on so many levels.
First, the UIGEA provisions relating to financial services companies (such as ********) did not go into effect until June 1, 2010. Banks and other payment processors were originally given until December 1, 2009, to implement regulations under the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, but were given a 6 month reprieve thanks to an extension passed late in 2009.
The plaintiff claims ******** is negligent for processing transactions in August and September 2009, before the financial services rules were in effect.
But perhaps more disturbing is that the guy lost a boat-load of money engaging in (apparently) illegal gambling, and now is asking for ******** (and, effectively) other ******** customers to share in his loss.
It also turns out that the same guy sued at least one other company for a similar reason (he sued TD Bank on August 26, seeking damages of $80,000 — he lost over $15,000 from his TD Bank account).
@)
