Oklahoma #1 in first BCS rankings. Followed by Oregon and Boise ST

Search

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,491
Tokens
You Boise backers need to relax. I'm sure you'll get what you deserve after impressing everyone in next few weeks with your impressive victories in your tough conference. I wouldn't worry, it will all work out !!
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
You Boise backers need to relax. I'm sure you'll get what you deserve after impressing everyone in next few weeks with your impressive victories in your tough conference. I wouldn't worry, it will all work out !!

smartazz.... very funny
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,303
Tokens
A complete joke as usual but that is to be expected from the BCS. The whole process is a joke & I am not just saying this because of Boise State. All of these polls are flawed. They clearly continue to not take into account what happened on the field. Look at how going into Saturday, a 1 loss South Carolina was behind a 1 loss Alabama team that they dominated & beat by double digits. Yet because of previous rankings, built in champion bias, etc.... they were behind them.

I don't argue with Oklahoma being #1 for now, they have at least played a decent OOC schedule, something they usually do. However the case could be made for Oregon or Boise at #1 as well. Overall let it stand because Oklahoma is a weak #1 as the momentum from other teams will probably get them leapfrogged anyhow.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Oregon will lose a few. Not sure about Oklahoma. The Sooners' schedule is just as easy as Boise State's the rest of the way.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Boise vs Oklahoma would be awesome as a championship game. That feller with the dog balls avatar will agree with me for once.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
1,330
Tokens
It would be pretty good to watch Boise beat Big Game Bob again.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
3,858
Tokens
Oregon will lose a few. Not sure about Oklahoma. The Sooners' schedule is just as easy as Boise State's the rest of the way.

how DARE you! are you comparing missouri to louisiana tech? okie st. to hawaii? texas to san jose? a big 12 title game to portland st? good lord man, you must be MAD!
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,491
Tokens
Oregon will lose a few. Not sure about Oklahoma. The Sooners' schedule is just as easy as Boise State's the rest of the way.

I guess you can't objectively look at your schedule and point at a possible loss while the rest of us have to navigate thru brutal schedules.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
how DARE you! are you comparing missouri to louisiana tech? okie st. to hawaii? texas to san jose? a big 12 title game to portland st? good lord man, you must be MAD!

Oregon played Portland State... Not us.

But yes, Hawaii and Missouri State could go either way. Texas is down this year. All the Nebraska win for them proved was that the Big 12 is having a bad year. Oklahoma is one of the few teams I think belongs in the top 5 (Oregon doesn't), but the Sooner schedule isn't really that tough.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
I guess you can't objectively look at your schedule and point at a possible loss while the rest of us have to navigate thru brutal schedules.

(sarcasm starts here, don't be pissed, you know I love ya) You guys have so many tough games. Mighty New Mexico and Portland State must have been torture. Playing at the worst team in the SEC was BRUTAL! You guys have to go at FREAKING CAL! (who lost to Nevada by double digits, a slightly above average WAC team). Then you have scary ass USC!!!! (who barely beat one of the top 100 teams in the nation in the WAC's Hawaii). OOOOO! One of the season enders is a home game against Arizona. I SHIT MY PANTS THINKING ABOUT IT! They only lost to Oregon State (Beavers on the road, by the way) by 10 or so. Boise only beat Oregon State by double digits. THE HORRORS OF YOUR PAC-10 SCHEDULE!
 

New member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
3,858
Tokens
anybody who thinks OU doesn't belong in the top 5 is just fucking with me....

and who cares what the pollsters think anyway....i'm already tired of hearing people say the human polls don't carry enough weight....hmm, the same people who had va tech ranked in the top 10? florida (i was one of them)? texas? usc in the top 15? penn st. in the top 20? georgia in the top 25? every year like clockwork, NO FEWER than 3 top 10 teams as decided by the humans go on to lose 5 or more games.....

we humans should get over ourselves....imagine the excitement if the first human poll (well, the ones that mattered anyway) was released for the first time at the same time as the BCS poll?
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,491
Tokens
(sarcasm starts here, don't be pissed, you know I love ya) You guys have so many tough games. Mighty New Mexico and Portland State must have been torture. Playing at the worst team in the SEC was BRUTAL! You guys have to go at FREAKING CAL! (who lost to Nevada by double digits, a slightly above average WAC team). Then you have scary ass USC!!!! (who barely beat one of the top 100 teams in the nation in the WAC's Hawaii). OOOOO! One of the season enders is a home game against Arizona. I SHIT MY PANTS THINKING ABOUT IT! They only lost to Oregon State (Beavers on the road, by the way) by 10 or so. Boise only beat Oregon State by double digits. THE HORRORS OF YOUR PAC-10 SCHEDULE!


So if Okla and Oregon or even Auburn run the table with their schedules you think Boise should still get a shot at the title ahead of those teams. I asume you do alot of screaming at your tv set because most commentators on TV sees the Pac 10 as the toughest conference this year, not the WAC !! Just look up strength of schedule anywhere and you'll see your argument is not valid here. You should just accept your not getting inot the game, so stay out of the big boy arguments. !!
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,491
Tokens
(sarcasm starts here, don't be pissed, you know I love ya) You guys have so many tough games. Mighty New Mexico and Portland State must have been torture. Playing at the worst team in the SEC was BRUTAL! You guys have to go at FREAKING CAL! (who lost to Nevada by double digits, a slightly above average WAC team). Then you have scary ass USC!!!! (who barely beat one of the top 100 teams in the nation in the WAC's Hawaii). OOOOO! One of the season enders is a home game against Arizona. I SHIT MY PANTS THINKING ABOUT IT! They only lost to Oregon State (Beavers on the road, by the way) by 10 or so. Boise only beat Oregon State by double digits. THE HORRORS OF YOUR PAC-10 SCHEDULE!

Every team schedules a Portland St or a new Mexico, the only difference is, you schedule 8-9 of these teams. You realize that in Conference play, teams from the power conferences are going to beat each other. One team has to lose in each game, conference is tough if your paying attention, so if AZ loses to OSU all of a sudden AZ is no good, but hey they did beat Iowa !! UCLA loses to Stanford , but they can beat Texas !! BTW your sure not playing anyone of the caliber of Stanford this year !
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
So if Okla and Oregon or even Auburn run the table with their schedules you think Boise should still get a shot at the title ahead of those teams. I asume you do alot of screaming at your tv set because most commentators on TV sees the Pac 10 as the toughest conference this year, not the WAC !! Just look up strength of schedule anywhere and you'll see your argument is not valid here. You should just accept your not getting inot the game, so stay out of the big boy arguments. !!

Nada. They deserve it. The schedule isn't that much tougher for either, but it's tougher (Auburn mostly in that sense). The Pac-10 is weak this year. Oregon will lose a game or two. I'm not worried (if that helps your screaming at the TV thing).

"Big boy arguments" is kind of funny.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Every team schedules a Portland St or a new Mexico, the only difference is, you schedule 8-9 of these teams. You realize that in Conference play, teams from the power conferences are going to beat each other. One team has to lose in each game, conference is tough if your paying attention, so if AZ loses to OSU all of a sudden AZ is no good, but hey they did beat Iowa !! UCLA loses to Stanford , but they can beat Texas !! BTW your sure not playing anyone of the caliber of Stanford this year !

Arizona beat Iowa because of BS and you know that. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they lost because they were one of the few legit top 5 teams Boise had to compete with. That being said, those teams could play 100 games and Iowa would win 95 of them. PS, the WAC is stuck with their schedule. Oregon could have scheduled some real out of conference teams like Alabama and others have done. They chose not to. Either way, I like Oregon. They are fun to watch. The fact of that matter that you will have to realize is that they have no defense and the offense doesn't work against legit defenses (Boise State, cough).

On the plus side, just think of how pissed off we can get if Oregon and Boise play in the title game this year. I hope to convey slobbery anger through my posts. We'll see.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,491
Tokens
Nada. They deserve it. The schedule isn't that much tougher for either, but it's tougher (Auburn mostly in that sense). The Pac-10 is weak this year. Oregon will lose a game or two. I'm not worried (if that helps your screaming at the TV thing).

"Big boy arguments" is kind of funny.

There is a decent chance we will lose a game, alot more of a chance to lose a game then your team does. hard to lose when your favored by 40 every game. The major 1 loss teams will still get in ahead of Boise anyway so come December we'll come in and see how your doing. BTW Your the only one that thinks the Pac 10 is weak this year. Most think the Pac 10 is the toughest conference this year.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,491
Tokens
Arizona beat Iowa because of BS and you know that. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they lost because they were one of the few legit top 5 teams Boise had to compete with. That being said, those teams could play 100 games and Iowa would win 95 of them. PS, the WAC is stuck with their schedule. Oregon could have scheduled some real out of conference teams like Alabama and others have done. They chose not to. Either way, I like Oregon. They are fun to watch. The fact of that matter that you will have to realize is that they have no defense and the offense doesn't work against legit defenses (Boise State, cough).

On the plus side, just think of how pissed off we can get if Oregon and Boise play in the title game this year. I hope to convey slobbery anger through my posts. We'll see.

I hope we do play, and let the best team win ! I'm sure when we scheduled Tennessee nobody thought they would be down. We have LSU next year and would have had GA in near future too but they canceled on us.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,491
Tokens
Arizona beat Iowa because of BS and you know that. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they lost because they were one of the few legit top 5 teams Boise had to compete with. That being said, those teams could play 100 games and Iowa would win 95 of them. PS, the WAC is stuck with their schedule. Oregon could have scheduled some real out of conference teams like Alabama and others have done. They chose not to. Either way, I like Oregon. They are fun to watch. The fact of that matter that you will have to realize is that they have no defense and the offense doesn't work against legit defenses (Boise State, cough).

On the plus side, just think of how pissed off we can get if Oregon and Boise play in the title game this year. I hope to convey slobbery anger through my posts. We'll see.

I could say that Boise beat Okla with BS too and would have lost 95 out of 100 games , but you can only dish those arguments out not receive them. Friggin AZ pounded iowa, not sure what you were watching.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
I could say that Boise beat Okla with BS too and would have lost 95 out of 100 games , but you can only dish those arguments out not receive them. Friggin AZ pounded iowa, not sure what you were watching.

Boise would have won that game by 10 if they didn't start to play prevent (on offense too). That is the one thing I don't like about Peterson. We get up by 20 and then let other teams come back by making it easy. It's worked just fine, but sometimes it backfires. Peterson wasn't the coach of the OU game, but it holds true.

PS, I am perfectly fine dishing and receiving. We will be arguing about football all year. Cheers (thanks for keeping it civil).
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,264
Messages
13,450,026
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com