Does this make any sense to anyone else?

Search

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
So Lady Gage, Alicia Keys, Usher, and a bunch of other celebrities are not logging into social networking sites until $1 million is raised for a certain charity. Article below:

http://new.music.yahoo.com/alicia-keys/news/keys-lady-gaga-to-sign-off-twitter-for-charity--61988573

Now, I think it's a great cause and all but it seems like these stars could earn more for the charity by posting on their damn Twitter accounts and reaching millions at a time. Just doesn't make sense to me. Seems like it would be easier to just have them tell people about the charity using social networking...
 

New member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
4,615
Tokens
The campaign is getting a lot of attention, I think it will work.
 

I never ever got beat-I just run out of Money
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
1,076
Tokens
f@ck them, they could just donate the money themselves and have a nice tax write-off
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
by Dylan Stableford, The Wrap

It appears the organizers of a Hollywood campaign to raise money for AIDS in Africa either overestimated the popularity of the celebrities they used -- or what their fans would be willing to donate to get them back on Facebook and Twitter.

The nifty campaign by Alicia Keys' "Keep a Child Alive" charity launched on Wednesday (World AIDS Day), declaring that Hollywood would die "a digital death" until a casket full of cash was raised.

"The world's top celebrities are sacrificing their digital lives to give real life to millions of people affected by HIV/AIDS in Africa and India," the campaign states. "That means no more Twitter or Facebook updates from any of them. No more knowing where they are, what they had for dinner, or what interesting things are happening in their lives. From here on out, they're dead. Kaput. Finished."

Celebrities including Ryan Seacrest, Kim Kardashian, Lady Gaga, Serena Williams, Justin Timberlake, and Elijah Wood all took part in the campaign -- many posing "dead" in caskets for the cause and recording video statements before their figurative demise.

25 Movie Stars You Must Follow on Twitter

The organizers promised that when fans donate more than $1,000,000, "everyone will be back online and tweeting in no time."

As of 7 p.m. EST, however, just $70,000 had been donated -- meaning unless Seacrest's fans come up with $930,000, the "American Idol" host and the rest of the "dead" celebrities won't be tweeting for the foreseeable future.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
It's for the Jonathon Winters campaign, read about this yesterday in the BOSTON GLOBE
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
8,229
Tokens
by Dylan Stableford, The Wrap

It appears the organizers of a Hollywood campaign to raise money for AIDS in Africa either overestimated the popularity of the celebrities they used -- or what their fans would be willing to donate to get them back on Facebook and Twitter.

The nifty campaign by Alicia Keys' "Keep a Child Alive" charity launched on Wednesday (World AIDS Day), declaring that Hollywood would die "a digital death" until a casket full of cash was raised.

"The world's top celebrities are sacrificing their digital lives to give real life to millions of people affected by HIV/AIDS in Africa and India," the campaign states. "That means no more Twitter or Facebook updates from any of them. No more knowing where they are, what they had for dinner, or what interesting things are happening in their lives. From here on out, they're dead. Kaput. Finished."

Celebrities including Ryan Seacrest, Kim Kardashian, Lady Gaga, Serena Williams, Justin Timberlake, and Elijah Wood all took part in the campaign -- many posing "dead" in caskets for the cause and recording video statements before their figurative demise.

25 Movie Stars You Must Follow on Twitter

The organizers promised that when fans donate more than $1,000,000, "everyone will be back online and tweeting in no time."

As of 7 p.m. EST, however, just $70,000 had been donated -- meaning unless Seacrest's fans come up with $930,000, the "American Idol" host and the rest of the "dead" celebrities won't be tweeting for the foreseeable future.


get a grip
 

New member
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
2,278
Tokens
If this means we hear less from these people I'm all for it.
i am w you 100%. these idiotic liberal celeb's kill me...they together could donate ea a million buck's that these fan's ALREADY PAID TO THEM, but this is not good enough for them, they want US , or their fan's to give even more of their money which many probably can't even afford to give in the first place..
 

New member
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
2,278
Tokens
what about american's w aid's? i would donate to our own cause first instead of to some of these other countries first...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,549
Messages
13,452,514
Members
99,422
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com