Should "NO ACTION" Mean NO Action on Any Bets?

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
At Sportsbook, I bet the Giants in a RR parlay with 3 other teams. I won with the only game I had in the morning, but shouldn't ALL the bets be taken down since there is no action on the Giants? Seems to me like they're waiting to see if the other teams lose before grading the bet. What is the right thing that should be done?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
1,587
Tokens
Your other one losing? If so if it were winning would you be asking this question? All I know is to check there rules.
 

Rx Dragon Puller
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
5,310
Tokens
no it should just eliminate that game and odds placed as 2 game parlay
 

New member
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
2,944
Tokens
In baseball, it just changes to 3 - 2 teamers and one 3 teamer if a leg of your RR gets rained out.

Not sure if that helps, but I can see the book using the same logic.
 

Pop-culture, entertainment, sports and contest Mod
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
33,977
Tokens
yes , i would agree....it would work like a push i would think...everything would revert to lesser parlay, the the 2 teamers involving them would be straight wagers...
 

powdered milkman
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
22,984
Tokens
reverts to 2 straight bets and a parlay.....money spends
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,643
Messages
13,453,221
Members
99,428
Latest member
callgirls
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com