Well they have the best record in the league. He is their quarterback. He has played very very well. Their defense is not that great. He leans on Turner a lot but from what I have seen he has only impressed. But i haven't seen enough games to tell if hes truly the MVP. But who really cares about MVP? Its not like anyone really remembers these kind of things. I really can't think of one player who has been extremely dominant besides i guess Brady so maybe its him
So you include the games into Vicks team record, where he didn't even play due to his injury (2-1 record by PHI), played just 10min in the 1st quarter (0-1, loss to WSH) or played just the 2nd half (0-1 loss to GB, came in down by 10, lost by 7)?
Doesn't seem really fair...in games he started and finished the Eagles are 8-1 so far, while they were 2-3 in the other 5 games.
Same applies for total yardage and the other total stats: While his turnover numbers would be worse, he would easily top Bradys total yardage hadnt he missed a total of 4 games.
Not saying he should be MVP since I think it's pretty much a coin toss between Brady/Vick.
Doesn't seem really fair...in games he started and finished the Eagles are 8-1 so far, while they were 2-3 in the other 5 games.
Same applies for total yardage and the other total stats: While his turnover numbers would be worse, he would easily top Bradys total yardage hadnt he missed a total of 4 games.
Not saying he should be MVP since I think it's pretty much a coin toss between Brady/Vick.
