Dirk Nowitzki vs. Larry Bird: Who Truly Is the Better of the Two?

Search

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Dirk Nowitzki or Larry Bird? Another classic example of comparing eras, where comparison really isn't possible.


On one hand, you have the uber-physical and fundamentally sound years of the '80s which rejuvenated a struggling NBA. And on the other hand, you have the modern NBA where it's more about finesse, isolation plays and endorsement deals.


To be clear, comparing these two greats is like comparing a million dollar diamond to a million dollar bar of solid gold. You really can't go wrong either way.


While Larry Bird has multiple championship rings to solidify his status as an all-time great, Nowitzki's uncanny ability to score is second to none. His seven-foot frame combined with his shooting technique is indefensible, being that he releases his shot above his head.
The biggest reason the name Bird comes up when talking about Nowitzki and vice versa, is merely because of the color of their skin.


Let's take a trip back in time to where both of these guys started setting themselves apart from their peers as young aspiring basketball greats.



While "The Hick from French Lick" grew up on a farm in a very rural environment, he started setting himself apart as a sophomore in high school, and eventually left Spring Valley High School as the all-time leading scorer. Now you tell me what the competition could possibly have been like in the early '70s in an area that had more farm animals than the human population.


Nowitzki's teen years were spent competing against grown men, being that he turned pro as a 16-year-old, playing for Germany's second-division team DJK Wuerzburg. He was still able to set himself apart from the competition which eventually earned him an invitation to the ever so prestigious Nike Hoop Summit.


Neither young bright stars Rashard Lewis nor Al Harrington could contain Nowitzki as he dominated USA's finest leading the International side with 33 points and 14 rebounds.
Sure, Bird led Indiana State to a 33-1 record in his senior season at ISU. And yes, of course he left ISU as the NCAA's fifth-leading scorer at the time. But how can you compare the talent and level of competition of the mid-'70s Missouri Valley Conference, to that of modern day AAU competitions and exposure of international talent that face off?


From Nike Hoop Summits to Adidas ABCD camps the competition is fierce and only the best end up on top.



Nowitzki was primed for the success he is currently having. And he has Holger Geschwinder to thank for it. Geschwinder laid the foundation for Nowitzki's yellow brick road. All Dirk had to do was stay on course.


Now, it is well known what kind of success Bird had in his legendary NBA career. His impact on the league was felt immediately. During his rookie year he helped flip the Celtics from a 29-53 record, to an NBA-best 61-21 record.


He was elected to the All-Star team in each of his full 12 seasons that he played. He was elected league MVP three consecutive years, a feat only matched by Bill Russell and Wilt Chamberlain.


He has garnered three championship rings while winning two finals MVP awards. For his career, Bird averaged 24.3 points, 10 rebounds and 6.3 assists per game all while shooting 50 percent from the floor.



In the modern NBA, where athletes are stronger, bigger, faster, more athletic and just plain better than 30 years ago and evolving as we speak, Nowitzki has career averages of 23 points and 8.4 rebounds per game.


How about Dirk in the clutch?


His playoff stats put him in elite company. He is averaging 25.6 points and 10.9 rebounds per game. Numbers only matched by greats such as Hakeem Olajuwon, Bob Petit and Elgin Baylor.
In elimination games he is averaging 28.4 points with 12.2 rebounds a game, while having scored 30 or more points in 13 of such games which is second-most in NBA history (Jerry West: 14).
He simply does things that no one else can do. He is the only player to record 150 three-pointers and 100 blocks in a single season.


Now for those who say Bird is better than Nowitzki, all usually have the same argument. Bird's three championship rings compared to Dirk's zero. Well, let's look at the supporting cast, shall we.


The three championship team rosters with which Bird won featured players such as Kevin McHale, Robert Parish, Dennis Johnson, Bob McAdoo, Nate Archibald and Bill Walton. Now what do all of these players have in common? That's right, they are all Hall of Fame inductees.



Now what kind of help has Dirk had? Potential Hall of Famer Steve Nash? Sure. Michael Finley. Eh. A Jason Kidd who, due to the law of age, has been on a steady decline?
The choice has to be pretty clear. Dirk Nowitzki may be a seven-footer but he is definitely not your ordinary lanky, awkward, uncoordinated traditional center. He is a point forward with indefensible moves.


Put a big on him and he'll make you pay from the outside. Put a quicker perimeter guy on him, and he will eat him up inside using his wide array of moves. He will post you up, shoot one-footed fadeaways off the backboard or sink one three-pointer after another if you dare him.


Pick your poison


With all due respect to one of the NBA's finest, Mr. Larry Bird, who was in a class of his own. The title of "The White Mamba" between these two, has got to go to Dirk Nowitzki.


BleacherReport
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,777
Tokens
As someone who watched 90% of all of Larry's games, I'd have to say that at this point, Larry was much better.

Larry was a much better passer, play-maker and rebounder. He also was a noticeably better defender, voted to the NBA all-defensive second team three times.
 

Self appointed RX World Champion Handicapper
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
15,052
Tokens
come see us when dirk joins the discussion of the top 5 players in history ... which, by the way, will be never...
 

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Messages
109
Tokens
As someone who watched 90% of all of Larry's games, I'd have to say that at this point, Larry was much better.

Larry was a much better passer, play-maker and rebounder. He also was a noticeably better defender, voted to the NBA all-defensive second team three times.

Completely agree. I was watching the last game with my son's and said take Nowitski and add tough, defensive rebounding, and make him one of the best passers in the game, and you have Larry Bird. Nowitzki is an excellent scorer, has never played better than this year, and has gone on a very serious run in the playoffs, but he doesn't have the all-around game that Bird had (very few have). I'm not talking about the end of his career when injuries got the best of him, but for at least 10 years, he was amazing to watch. The younger folk have no idea how good Bird and Magic were as all-around ball players.
 

powdered milkman
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
22,984
Tokens
bird and not close IMO
 

New member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
4,555
Tokens
notice the steals and passes in there. it also should be noted that this is Dirks 13th season - the exact number of seasons Birds career lasted before injuries forced him to give it up . Dirk is the better physical specimen but the 13 year resumes do not compare
 

New member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
29,253
Tokens
On top of everything else, Bird made every other Celtic on the floor with him, better.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,491
Tokens
Bird was clutch almost from the very beginning, Dirk has to finish a season clutch and then we can have this discussion.
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
As much as I like Dirk, and as bad as I want to say he's just as good as Larry Bird, I just can't.

I will say that Larry had much more help during his career than Dirk has.

Give Nowitzki Robert Parish, Kevin McHale, Danny Ainge, etc., and I'm sure he would already own 3-4 rings.

But in the end, I'd still take Bird before Dirk every time...
 

New member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
4,555
Tokens
Give Nowitzki Robert Parish, Kevin McHale, Danny Ainge, etc., and I'm sure he would already own 3-4 rings...

agree there, crooked ass NBA , Birds acquisition was shady from the start. this was a stacked team way before the heat. but the celts/lakers series got me hooked on basketball and im still a celts fan
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
agree there, crooked ass NBA , Birds acquisition was shady from the start. this was a stacked team way before the heat. but the celts/lakers series got me hooked on basketball and im still a celts fan



I was Celtics fan too until the Magic came to town.

Still followed Boston though, but don't care for the image Kevin Garnett and some of the others have brought to the team in recent years...
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,777
Tokens
agree there, crooked ass NBA , Birds acquisition was shady from the start. this was a stacked team way before the heat. but the celts/lakers series got me hooked on basketball and im still a celts fan

How was Bird's acquisition shady? The Celtics signed him under the Junior Eligible Rule. Any other team could have done the same thing.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
Cannot see any possible way Nowitzki even comes close unless someone wants to argue athletic skills tend to increase from generation to generation

Kobe Bryant or Larry Bird for greatest small forward in history is the real question. I'll go with Bird for now, but he slowed down so much after 31, while Bryant is still easily one of the 10 best players in the world
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,276
Messages
13,450,148
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com