3 Wednesday w/analysis

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
Yesterday 5 2 0 +9.40 Units
Last 30 Days 40 50 1 -8.02 Units
Season To Date (Since March 2011) 83 102 1 -14.82 Units

All games are listed pitchers unless stated otherwise.


HOME TEAM IN CAPS

Washington +172 over SAN FRANCISCO
3:45 PM EST. The Giants are now 3-2 on their current home stand and they’ve scored 12 runs over that stretch. Take away the five runs they scored in a 13-inning game on Monday and that’s seven runs in four games and therein lies the trouble you’re asking for when laying large lumber with the Giants. San Fran is batting .204 over the past week and they’ll face a pitcher they’ve never seen before in Yunesky Maya. Maya is 0-2 with an ERA of 8.00 but the sample size is too small to put any merit on it. After defecting from Cuba last July, Maya arrived in the majors in a matter of weeks. He made just five minor league appearances. The crafty right-hander throws the proverbial "kitchen sink" at hitters, with both his slider and curve being solid, and he has good command. That said, he has little margin for error. He struggles to get the ball over 90 mph, though he can get solid sink on it, and lacks a true swing-and-miss pitch. He was nibbling too often last year, but reportedly is working on trusting his pitches a bit more and he has a bit more raw stuff now as he rounds back into form after not having pitched much in the past year and a half. He’s not nearly as awful as those surface stats suggest and the Giants bats could instill some early confidence in him. Matt Cain needs no introduction. He’s a AAA reliability workhorse that almost always give the Giants a chance to win. However, the Giants are just 1-2 in Cain’s last three starts and over that span his ERA is 4.74. Furthermore, he’s had trouble against the Nats and in fact, current Washington batters have 72 AB’s against Cain and they’re hitting a combined .324 against him. Tag has influence and Giants inability to score adds to the appeal. Play: Washington +172 (Risking 2 units).

San Diego +103 over COLORADO
6:35 PM EST. Aaron Cook favored in San Diego is a little out of whack when you consider that the Rocks can’t win a baseball game on the road with their best pitchers going. In fact, Colorado has won just four of its last 17 road games and now you’re going to trust them as the chalk with Cook on the hill? Cook is a lifetime stiff with two good years in his 10 years of service. The Rockies are using him over some other prospects and they’re using him for one reason and one reason only. Actually, check that. They’re using him for 10 million reasons. That’s right, that’s what the Rocks will pay Cook in 2011 so they’re going to put that money to work whether he’s ready or not. Cook has a career ERA of 4.41 and a career BAA of .291 over 10 years and that’s when he was feeling good. In the past nine months he’s suffered a broken leg, a broken finger, a bad back and shoulder stiffness. His ERA last season was 5.08 and one really has to question just how sharp he’ll be in is first start of the year. Even at his best, Cook is one of the most hittable pitchers in the game and it’s doubtful he’ll be close to that level here. He has no upside whatsoever, as his skills and body continue to deteriorate. The Pads have won four of five, eight of their past 11 and should not be a pooch in their own barn against a broken down stiff throwing for a team that can’t win on the road. Play: San Diego +103 (Risking 2 units).

Boston +117 over N.Y. YANKEES
Pay no attention to A.J Burnett’s recent success of three quality starts in which he went 2-0 with a 3.44 ERA. Those starts came in Oakland, Seattle and at Citi Field against the Mets, all extreme pitchers parks. Reasons not to expect the 2006-08 version to return? How about a three-year decline in strikeout rate and a skill set that is in a death spiral. In New York, he's been consistently mediocre: half-season xERAs of 4.31/4.47/4.53/4.54 (2009-2010) and this year is no different. Current skills say he's a shell of his former self and age makes anything close to a major turnaround unlikely. This isn’t the A’s, M’s or Mets either. The Red Sox are batting .289 with an .834 OPS over the last 28 days and have scored 40 runs over their past six games. Tim Wakefield will go out there and do what he always does. He may get hit hard but he may also throw six strong and frankly, there isn’t a crystal ball in the world that can predict which version we’ll see here. What we do know is that the Yanks are overpriced again and that A.J. Burnett has very little chance of success. We also know that the Red Sox have a juggernaut offense and that they’ve won 20 of their past 26 games on grass. Whenever you can get the Red Sox at a tag, especially against a guy like Burnett, you’re going with the best of it. Play: Boston +117 (Risking 2 units).
 

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
12,186
Tokens
METS PLAYED YANKS AT yANKEE STADIUM NOT CITIFIELD..THAT IS 4TH OF JULY WEEKEND..LOV SAN DIEGO TODAY BUT I THNK A RESTED YANKEE PEN GETS IT DONE

LIKE OVER FIRST 5 THAT GAME AS I AGREE BURNETT WILL GIVE UP ATLEAST 3
 

New York Giants Fan!
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
857
Tokens
nobody messes with Sherwood, he cashed me in way too much last night :D
 

New member
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
1,618
Tokens
You're really gonna consider numbers for Cook from 10 years ago?

Talk about irrelevant stats and looking for what you want to...
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
You're really gonna consider numbers for Cook from 10 years ago?

Talk about irrelevant stats and looking for what you want to...

I agree 10 years ago means nothing but his whole history does and so does last year's 5.08 ERA and a career BAA of .291. And how about those 147 hits in 127 innings with 62 K's. I could go on and on about how inept this guy is. Don't blame Coors either. His road ERA last year was 5.85 with a BAA of .304 and that's not just one year, it's every year and this season he's off to a late start. Doesn't mean he loses today, just means he should not be favored.
 

New York Giants Fan!
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
857
Tokens
I dont get why people come in here just to be negative.. just don't post at all? No?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
962
Tokens
Sherwood, it's me again hijacking your baseball thread to ask your hockey opinion. (sorry this will only happen 3 more times at the most). Call me crazy but I am back on Boston tonight. Lots of emotion on both sides right now. I look for a much lower scoring game and think Boston takes this one 3-2 or maybe 2-1. ??
 

New member
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
1,618
Tokens
I dont get why people come in here just to be negative.. just don't post at all? No?

It's called constructive criticism, it's how people get better.

Sherwood's second post regarding Cook was more applicable to his opinion on the Padres today than his initial write-up was.

Threads that are nothing but good lucks and you're the bests help nobody here.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
287
Tokens
It's called constructive criticism, it's how people get better.

Sherwood's second post regarding Cook was more applicable to his opinion on the Padres today than his initial write-up was.

Threads that are nothing but good lucks and you're the bests help nobody here.


Very well said, couldnt agree more......another thing u guys ahvent mentioned is Cook is something like 14-4 lifetime vs SD
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
962
Tokens
"You're really gonna consider numbers for Cook from 10 years ago?

Talk about irrelevant stats and looking for what you want to... "


I must have missed the constructive part. All I see is straight criticism.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
Very well said, couldnt agree more......another thing u guys ahvent mentioned is Cook is something like 14-4 lifetime vs SD

You're going to really consider a win by Cook over San Diego 10 years ago? How does that impact this game?
 

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
2,564
Tokens
You're going to really consider a win by Cook over San Diego 10 years ago? How does that impact this game?
I think it is relevent that Cook is 7-1 lifetime at Petco Park with an era of 2.21. A fairly solid effort today for 5 2/3 and they were winning when he left the game.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
287
Tokens
His lifetime record is exactly what it says....a Lifetime.....didnt know their was limits to that......If your telling me that his lifetime record of 14-4 and 7-1 at Petco isnt figured justinto the betting line then forget it......Bettors see that and blindly jump on it.....c`mon
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,582
Messages
13,452,593
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com